Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Detection photometric

A practical method for low level perchlorate analysis employs ion chromatography. The unsuppressed method using a conductivity detector has a lower detectable limit of about 10 ppm. A suppression technique, which suppresses the conductivity of the electrolyte but not the separated ions, can further improve sensitivity (110,111). Additionally, ion chromatography can be coupled with indirect photometric detection and appHed to the analysis of perchlorates (112). [Pg.68]

The continuous methods combine sample collection and the measurement technique in one automated process. The measurement methods used for continuous analyzers include conductometric, colorimetric, coulometric, and amperometric techniques for the determination of SO2 collected in a liquid medium (7). Other continuous methods utilize physicochemical techniques for detection of SO2 in a gas stream. These include flame photometric detection (described earlier) and fluorescence spectroscopy (8). Instruments based on all of these principles are available which meet standard performance specifications. [Pg.201]

M. De Paoli, M. Barbina Taccheo, R. Mondini, A. Pezzoni and A. Valentino, Determination of organophosphoms pesticides in fruits by on-line size-exclusion chi O-matography-flame photometric detection , 7. Chromatogr. 626 145-151 (1992). [Pg.248]

Naphthalenedisulfonate-acetonitrile as the only mobile phase with a silica column coated with a crosslinked aminofluorocarbon polymer has proven to be an effective combination for the separation of aliphatic anionic surfactants. Indirect conductivity and photometric detection modes are used to monitor these analytes. The retention of these surfactants is found to depend on both the ionic strength and the organic solvent content of the mobile phase. The mechanism of retention is considered to be a combination of both reverse phase and ion exchange processes. Selective separation of both alkanesulfonates and... [Pg.168]

The ionic or polar substances can be seperated without any reaction on specially treated chromatographic columns and detected refractometrically. This is necessary because alkyl sulfosuccinates show only small absorption in the UV-visible region no sensitive photometric detection can be obtained. Separation problems can arise when common steel columns filled with reverse phase material (or sometimes silica gel) are used. This problem can be solved by adding a suitable counterion (e.g., tetrabutylammonium) to the mobile phase ( ion pair chromatography ). This way it is possible to get good separation performance. For an explanation of separation mechanism see Ref. 65-67. A broad review of the whole method and its possibilities in use is given in an excellent monograph [68]. [Pg.516]

The photometric detection limit of carprofen was at 4 ng substance per chromatogram zone 100 ng substance per chromatogram zone could be detected visually. [Pg.81]

The visual detection limits for polyphenols and flavonoids are 0.2 to 1 pg substance per chromatogram zone [1]. The photometric detection limits are appreciably lower (see Procedure Tested ). [Pg.98]

Note The photometric detection limits for ascorbic and dehydroascorbic acids are less than 50 ng substance per chromatogram zone. [Pg.225]

Boraiko C, Yoder R, Cooper J, Lieckfield R Jr, Remski M (2004) Sampling and analysis of butyltin compounds in air using gas chromatography and flame photometric detection. Journai of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1 (1 ) 50-56. [Pg.44]

Jiang GB, Xu FZ, Zhang FJ (1999) Dioctyltin and tributyltin detection at trace levels in water and beverages by capillary gas chromatography with flame photometric detection. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 363(3) 256-260. [Pg.47]

Liu JM, Jiang GB, Zhou QF (2001) Comprehensive trace-ievei determination of methyitin compounds in aqueous sampies by cryogenic purge-and-trap gas chromatography with fiame photometric detection. Analytical Sciences, 7(11) 1279-1283. [Pg.48]

Baynes RE, Bowen JM. 1995. Rapid determination of methyl parathion and methyl paraoxon in milk by gas chromatography with solid-phase extraction and flame photometric detection. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 78 812-815. [Pg.194]

Prinsloo SM, De Beer P143R. 1985. Gas chromatographic relative retention data for pesticides on nine packed columns I. Organophosphorus pesticides, using flame photometric detection. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68 1100-1108. [Pg.227]

Stan H-J, Mrowetz D. 1983. Residue analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in food with 2-dimensional gas chromatography using capillary columns and flame photometric detection. J High Resol Chromatog Chromatog Comm 6 255-263. [Pg.232]

The presence of heteroatoms usually provides a convenient feature for improving selectivity by employing selective detection mechanisms. GC may then use flame photometric detection (FPD) for S and P atoms and to a certain extent for N, Se, Si etc. thermoselective detection (TSD) and nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD) for N and P atoms electron capture detection (ECD) for halogen atoms (E, Cl, Br, and 1) and for systems with conjugated double bonds and electron-drawing groups or atomic emission detection (AED) for many heteroatoms. [Pg.53]

Universal and selective detectors, linked to GC or LC systems, have remained the predominant choice of analysts for the past two decades for the determination of pesticide residues in food. Although the introduction of bench-top mass spectrometers has enabled analysts to produce more unequivocal residue data for most pesticides, in many laboratories the use of selective detection methods, such as flame photometric detection (FPD), electron capture detection (BCD) and alkali flame ionization detection (AFID) or nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD), continues. Many of the new technologies associated with the on-going development of instrumental methods are discussed. However, the main objective of this section is to describe modern techniques that have been demonstrated to be of use to the pesticide residue analyst. [Pg.737]

The most common final separation techniques used for agrochemicals are GC and LC. A variety of detection methods are used for GC such as electron capture detection (BCD), nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD), flame photometric detection (FPD) and mass spectrometry (MS). For LC, typical detection methods are ultraviolet (UV) detection, fluorescence detection or, increasingly, different types of MS. The excellent selectivity and sensitivity of LC/MS/MS instruments results in simplified analytical methodology (e.g., less cleanup, smaller sample weight and smaller aliquots of the extract). As a result, this state-of-the-art technique is becoming the detection method of choice in many residue analytical laboratories. [Pg.878]

Each sample was fortified with chlorpyrifos, as a reference standard, to determine the recovery during each extraction. Three portions of solvent were used, and the combined extract for each sample was dried with sodium sulfate. Analyses employed gas chromatography/flame photometric detection. Limits of detection for vegetation and animal tissues were 0.2 and 0.007 pg respectively. Recoveries from fortified samples were 82%. Diazoxon occurrence was infrequenf and at trace concentrations. [Pg.949]

In multi-residue analysis, an analyte is identified by its relative retention time, e.g., relative to aldrin when using ECD or relative to parathion or chlorpyrifos when using a flame photometric detection (FPD) and NPD. Such relative retention times are taken from corresponding lists for the columns used. Further evidence for the identity of an analyte is provided by the selectivity of the different detectors (Modules D1 to D3), by its elution behavior during column chromatography (Modules Cl and C2) and in some cases even by the peak form in a gas chromatogram. In a specific analysis for only some individual analytes, their retention times are compared directly with the corresponding retention times of the analytes from standard solutions. [Pg.1103]

Oxime carbamates are not directly amenable to gas chromatography (GC) because of their high thermal instability, which often leads to their breakdown at the injection port or in the column during analysis. Analysis of oxime carbamates by GC with sulfur detection or flame photometric detection involves oxidation of the intact insecticides or alkaline hydrolysis to form the more volatile but stable oxime compound. Enzymatic techniques have been reported for the analysis of these compounds. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has been used to determine aldicarb and its sulfone and sulfoxide metabolites and methomyl in water, soil, and sediment samples. [Pg.1144]

Quantitation is performed by the calibration technique. Construct a new calibration curve with methomyl oxime standard solutions (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 xgmL in acetone) for each set of analyses. Plot the peak area against the injected amount of methomyl oxime on logarithmic paper. As the amount of alanycarb is measured in terms of its oxime derivative, a conversion factor of 3.8 (the molecular weight ratio of alanycarb to methomyl oxime) should be applied to obtain the net amount. The injection volume should be kept constant as the peak area varies with the injection volume in flame photometric detection. Before each set of measurements, check the GC system by injecting more than one standard solution containing ca 2-10 ng of methomyl oxime. [Pg.1255]

Frenzel, W., Schepers, D., and Schulze, G., Simultaneous ion chromatographic determination of anions and cations by series conductivity and flame photometric detection, Anal. Chim. Acta, 277, 103, 1993. [Pg.274]

Weston, A., Brown, P. R., Jandik, P., Heckenberg, A. L., and Jones, W. R., Optimization of detection sensitivity in the analysis of inorganic cations by capillary ion electrophoresis using indirect photometric detection,. Chromatogr., 608, 395, 1992. [Pg.422]

Shi, H., Zhang, R., Chandrasekher, G., and Ma, Y., Simultaneous detection and quantitation of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium in ocular lenses by high-performance capillary electrophoresis with indirect photometric detection, ]. Chromatogr. A, 680, 653 1994. [Pg.422]

Methods exist for determining levels of diisopropyl methylphosphonate in air, soil, and water. These methods include separation by GC coupled with FID and flame photometric detection (FPD), determination by infrared and Raman spectroscopy, separation by ionization mass spectrometry, determination utilizing piezoelectric crystals, and determination by gas-sensitive microsensors. Table 6-2 summarizes the methods that have been used to analyze environmental samples for diisopropyl methylphosphonate. [Pg.131]

AFID = alkali-flame ionization detection FID = flame ionization detection FPD = flame photometric detection GC = gas chromatography IGEFET = interdigitated gate electrode field-effect transistor ITMS = ion trap mass spectrometry MIMS = multiphoton ionization mass spectrometry MS = mass spectrometry... [Pg.136]

Sass S, Parker GA. 1980. Structure-response relationship of gas chromatography-flame photometric detection to some organophosphorus compounds. J Chromatogr 189(3) 331-349. [Pg.153]


See other pages where Detection photometric is mentioned: [Pg.113]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.830]    [Pg.933]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.954]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.297]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.287 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.208 , Pg.209 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.166 ]




SEARCH



Capillary electrophoresis with flame photometric detection

Chromatography photometric detection

Filter Photometric Detection

Flame photometric detection

Flame photometric detection chromatograms

Flame photometric detection method

Gas chromatography-flame photometric detection

Indirect photometric detection

Photometric

Photometric detection, capillary

Pulsed flame photometric detection

Sensors based on integrated retention and photometric detection

© 2024 chempedia.info