Retention times relative

Two gas chromatograms showing the effect of polarity of the stationary phase on the separation efficiency for three substances of increasing polarity toluene, pyridine, and benzaldehyde. (a) Separation on silicone SE-30, a nonpolar phase, and (b) separation on elastomer OV-351, a more polar phase. Note the greatly changed absolute and relative retention times the more polar pyridine and benzaldehyde are affected most by the move to a more polar stationary phase. 

RRT - Relative retention time for elution in HPLC TGA - Thermogravimetric analysis... 

On the other hand, the analyst might not be interested in global retention indices. Indeed, by increasing the temperature for SF3, he would obtain similar retention indices as for the other two. He will then observe that the relative retention time, i.e. the retention times of the substances compared with each other, are the same for SF, and SF3 and different from SFj. Chemically, this means that SF3 has different polarity from SFj, but the same specific interactions. This is best expressed by using the correlation coefficient as the similarity measure. Indeed, rj3 = 1, indicating complete similarity, while r 2 23 much lower. Since both... 

Alternatively, LC is used for the separation and quantification of PAHs using both UV and fluorescence detection. The analytes are identified based on their relative retention times and UV and/or fluorescence emission spectra. For UV detection an efficient cleanup is a prerequisite since this detection method is not very selective (almost universal for PAHs), and hence it also responds to many coeluting compounds. Due to the high specificity of fluorescence detection for most PAHs, this LC detection method is less susceptible to potential interferences. As in the case of GC the apphcation of internal standard(s) is mandatory since solvents have to be evaporated during the cleanup, which may result in partial losses of some of the more volatile analytes. 

Polar or thermally labile compounds - many of the more modern pesticides fall into one or other of these categories - are not amenable to GC and therefore LC becomes the separation technique of choice. HPLC columns may be linked to a diode-array detector (DAD) or fluorescence detector if the target analyte(s) contain chromophores or fluorophores. When using a DAD, identification of the analyte(s) is based on the relative retention time and absorption wavelengths. Similarly, with fluorescence detection, retention time and emission and absorption wavelengths are used for identification purposes. Both can be subject to interference caused by co-extractives present in the sample extract(s) and therefore unequivocal confirmation of identity is seldom possible. 

In multi-residue analysis, an analyte is identified by its relative retention time, e.g., relative to aldrin when using ECD or relative to parathion or chlorpyrifos when using a flame photometric detection (FPD) and NPD. Such relative retention times are taken from corresponding lists for the columns used. Further evidence for the identity of an analyte is provided by the selectivity of the different detectors (Modules D1 to D3), by its elution behavior during column chromatography (Modules Cl and C2) and in some cases even by the peak form in a gas chromatogram. In a specific analysis for only some individual analytes, their retention times are compared directly with the corresponding retention times of the analytes from standard solutions. 

Derivative Relative Retention Time (for Cholesterol) Least Detectable Amount Cholesterol (ng) Octanol (pg).. ... 

Chromatographic system (See Chromatography <621 >.) The liquid chromatograph is equipped with a 230 nm detector and a 4.6 mm x 30 cm column that contains packing L7. The flow rate is about 2 mL/min. Chromatograph the Resolution solution and the Standard preparation, and record the peak responses as directed under Procedure the resolution, R, between the dibutyl phthalate and miconazole peaks is not less than 5, the tailing factor for the miconazole peak is not more than 1.3, and the relative standard deviation for replicate injections of the Standard preparation is not more than 2%. The relative retention times are about 0.7 for dibutyl phthalate and 1 for miconazole. 

Chromatographic system. (Follow the method described in the general procedure <621 >.) The gas chromatograph is equipped with a flame ionization detector and a 1.2 m x 2 mm column packed with 3% phase G32 on support S1A. The injection port, detector, and column temperatures are maintained at about 250, 300, and 250 °C, respectively, and helium is used as the carrier gas, flowing at rate of about 50 mL/min. The relative retention times for cholestane and miconazole nitrate are about 0.44 and 1, respectively. Chromatograph the Standard preparation, and record the peak responses as directed for procedure The resolution, R, between cholestane and miconazole nitrate is not less than 2 and the relative standard deviation of replicate injections is not more than 3%. 

Procedure Separately inject equal volumes (about 5 pL) of the Standard preparation and the Assay preparation into the chromatograph, record the chromatograms, and measure the responses for the major peaks. The relative retention times for cholestane and miconazole nitrate are about 0.5 and 1, respectively. Calculate the quantity, in mg, of Ci8H14Cl4N2OHN03 in the portion of topical powder given by the formula ... 

Relative retention times for niclosamide and 570 drugs and related compounds on eight chromatographic systems were reported. Reversed-phase high-pressure chromatography employing octadecylsilanized columns was described [69]. 

Chromatographic system. The gas chromatograph is equipped with a flamioniza-tion detector and a 2 mm x 1.8 m glass column packed with 10% phase G34 on 80- to 100-mesh support SI A. The column temperature is maintained at about 150 °C, and the injection port and the detector block temperatures are maintained at about 250 °C. Dry helium is used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of about 40 mL/min. Chromatograph the Standard preparation, measure the peak responses, and calculate the ratio, Rs, as directed for procedure the relative retention times are about 0.5 for valproic acid and 1.0 for biphenyl the resolution, R, between valproic acid and biphenyl is not less than 3.0 the relative standard deviation for replicate injections is not more than 2.0%. 

All of the initial CGC organobromine degradation products assignments were based on the use of relative retention time standards. The relative retention times for the partially brominated degradation products were established either by the synthesis of the expected degradation products or by the use of selective debromination reactions. 

For the decabromodiphenyl oxide (DBDPO) pyrolysis reactions, two different procedures were used to synthesize the series of brominated diphenyl oxides and dibenozofurans employed as the relative retention time standards AlBr3/Br2 in ethylene dibromide and Fe° (metal)/Br2 in tetrachloroethylene. The rate of the initial bromination steps in the former reaction was so rapid that only the higher degree of bromination adducts could be isolated. The rate of the Fe°/Br2 reaction was found to be much slower, especially during the initial stages, and these reactions yielded a broader range of relative retention time reference peaks. 

An analogous series of dibenzodioxin relative retention time standards were prepared from dibenzodioxin (DBD) using Fe°/Br2 and the same procedure used to brominate the ether and the furan. The DBD itself was prepared by refluxing ortho-chlorophenol with NaOH. 

The relative retention times employed in the study of the HBCD pyrolysis reactions were obtained by the use of selective chemical debromination. The HBCD was selectively debrominated using Zn° (metal) powder in a refluxing ether solution. A small amount of acetic acid was used as the catalyst. 

In order to confirm the relative retention times established for DBDPO using only CGC, additional sets of partially brominated diphenyl oxides and dibenzofurans were synthesized using the Fe°/ Br2 procedure. The course of these reactions was followed by both CGC and CGC/MS. As a result, it was possible to simultaneously confirm the previous relative retention time peak assignments as well as to correlate the retention times between the two instruments. Some of the pertinent comparative retention time data obtained from these experiments is summarized in Table I. Upon completion of the individual reactions, a cocktail containing both partially brominated furans and diphenyl oxides was mixed. A typical CGC chromatogram and a CGC/MS total ion chromatogram for this cocktail are shown in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. 

On the basis of the results obtained from these combined CGC and CGC/MS experiments it was possible to positively confirm all of the relative retention times assignments which had previously been made using CGC analysis alone. 

Obtained from CGC and CGC/MS Analysis of the Relative Retention Time Standards... 

Isomeric Group and PCB Number Structure (chlorine-filled) Relative Retention Time Relative Response Facto rb Log Kow ... 

Peaks are identified from absolute or relative retention times by comparison with data from previously run standards stored in RAM or in libraries on disk. To take account of the variability of retention times from successive runs, retention time windows are used. These are defined as being /R x% for a standard, the unknown being positively identified if its retention time falls within the specified range. The size of the window can be varied by the user to conform with the degree of certainty required. Reference peaks can be selected for the calculation of relative retention times or as internal standards in quantitative analysis (pp. 9, 114). 

Intermediates in the synthesis of halcinonide (cf. section 1.5) have the following relative retention times Dihydrotriamcinolone, = 0.18jdihydrotriamcinolone ace-... 

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for nalidixic acid on a strong anion-exchange resin column has been reported, using a mobile phase of 0.01 M sodium tetraborate at pH 9.2 and 0.003 M sodium sulfate. The relative retention time for nalidixic acid in the system reported by Sondach and Koch was 0.86 with sulfanilic acid as the standard at... 

For instance, the relative retention time for phenobarbitone to barbitone in procedure 3.1 is calculated as follows ... 

---