Determinative procedure guidelines

By definition, the determinative procedure must be able to quantify the concentration of the marker residue. For compounds with a tolerance, it is critical that the analysis be able to determine accurately if the concentration of the marker residue is above or below the tolerance in the target tissue. The CVM guidelines for determinative procedures call for an average recovery >80% with a coefficient of variation (CV) of <10% for marker residue tolerances of lOOpgkg or greater and an average recovery of >60% with a CV of <20% for marker residues with a tolerance below 100 ppb. 

Guidelines for acceptability of NADA and non-NADA methods are the same. For the determinative procedure, the criteria described in Method Criteria for accuracy and precision are used to evaluate data generated at participating laboratories. There are no criteria for accuracy in the analysis of the incurred residue samples however, the overall data set is reviewed to see if there is general agreement between results obtained by contract laboratories and relative to the levels reported in the sponsor s laboratory. 

Procedural guidelines for accuracy determination include replicate analysis, e.g., three to six assays, at five levels, over the range from 80% of the lowest expected assay value to 120% of the highest expected assay value, or from 75% to 125% of label claim, six samples of drug in the matrix spanning 50% to 150% of the expected content. At minimum, three concentrations must be used within the analytical range (extremes and midpoint of expected or near quantitation limit, center of range, and upper bound of standard curve). 

ANSI/ISA-84.00.01-2004-1, Clause 8, and ANSI/ISA-84.01-1996 address the Hazard and Risk Analysis (H RA). Both mandate the need for H RA, but neither defines how to specifically execute the H RA or to identify process risk. Rather than providing specific requirements, ANSI/ISA-84.01-1996 referred to OSHA 1910.119 and the CCPS books. Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, and Guidelines for Safe Automation of Chemical Processes, for guidance on determining the SIS requirements. ANSI/ISA-84.01-1996, Annex A, also provided examples of H RA techniques commonly used in 1996. 

Written definition of roles and procedural guidelines are necessary for Inclusion Project and partner school staff. These will assist in determining not oiUy appropriate pedagogic activity on the part of staff such as LSAs, but will also serve to guide staff inside and outside the Inclusion Project on who is responsible for what, and who is accountable to whom. 

To evaluate the image quality of the processing system, one can determine classical parameters like spatial resolution, contrast resolution, dynamic range, local and global distortion. Guidelines for film digitization procedures have been well described now. Furthermore, a physical standard film for both equipment assessment and digitization calibration and control, will be available in a next future (4). 

Individuals differ in their sensitivity to odor. Figure 14-7 shows a typical distribution of sensitivities to ethylsulfide vapor (17). There are currently no guidelines on inclusion or exclusion of individuals with abnormally high or low sensitivity. This variability of response complicates the data treatment procedure. In many instances, the goal is to determine some mean value for the threshold representative of the panel as a whole. The small size of panels (generally fewer than 10 people) and the distribution of individual sensitivities require sophisticated statistical procedures to find the threshold from the responses. 

In the bibliography to ISO/TS 16949 there is only one customer reference manual mentioned the QS-9000 Measurement Systems Analysis Manual. This provides excellent guidelines for selecting procedures to assess the quality of a measurement system. It includes an introduction to measurement systems, explains the factors that cause variation in a measurement system, has guidance for preparing for a measurement system study, and includes step-by-step procedures for determining the degree of each type of variation present in a measurement system. 

Originally, compounds containing coordination complexes were given common names such as Prussian blue (KFe[Fe (CN)g ]), which is deep blue, or Reinecke s salt (NH4[Cr (NH3)2 (NCS)4]), named for its first maker. Eventually, coordination compounds became too numerous for chemists to keep track of all the common names. To solve the nomenclature problem, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (lUPAC) created a systematic procedure for naming coordination compounds. The following guidelines are used to determine the name of a coordination compound from its formula, or vice versa ... 

A pharmacopoeial reference substance is intended for the determination of the main component of a substance or for the active ingredient of a pharmaceutical formulation which is usually present at a high proportion of the total. The reference substance is to be used as a primary standard in a specific method validated as prescribed in the ICH Guideline Validation of Analytical Procedure Methodology" (Technical Guide for the Elaboration of Monographs 1996 ICH Guideline 1997). the reproducibility of which is known. This is taken into account when the limits of acceptance (tolerance) for the substance or product are fixed (Daas and Miller 1997,1998). 

Data from several laboratories within the Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4) in the USA have been evaluated for determining the values of MDL and MQL. These data have been presented in Table 1. The two-step procedure described in the EPA guideline was used to calculate the values of MDL and MQL. For the first step, the slope, intercept and RMSE values for the first three calibration curves of each study were separately calculated, then the IDL and IQL values calculated and the value of LQQ estimated for the method. These values were compared with the actual values of LLMV. The standard deviation of the spike recoveries at the LLMV (xllmv) was used to calculate the MDL and MQL. The values of LLMV were separately determined by the laboratory not using any of the methods described in this article. 

In summary, the CSL guidelines can be simply applied in each laboratory and contain very clear instructions. The validated procedures do not focus on the central analytical part only. Important secondary aspects of the whole procedure (sample processing, analyte stability, extraction efficiency) are also considered. For each parameter which is determined, different criteria for the evaluation of quantitative, semi-quantitative and screening methods are given. Here, it should be noted that compared with other guidelines the requirement for the precision of quantitative methods is very stringent (RSD < 10%). 

Since one of the key purposes of this study is to determine residue partitioning in the various processed commodities, every reasonable effort must be made to start the processing procedures with some level of residue in the RAC. If the RAC has residues present at harvest under normal GAP, then selective partitioning can be easily detected as the RAC is processed. However, if there is no residue in/on the RAC, the guideline indicates that exaggerated application rates may be required to obtain sufficient residue level to conduct a successful processing study. Usually a three- or... 

Before undertaking a discussion of the mathematics involved in the determination of reaction rates is undertaken, it is necessary to point out the importance of proper data acquisition in stability testing. Applications of rate equations and predictions are meaningful only if the data utilized in such processes are collected using valid statistical and analytical procedures. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss the proper statistical treatments and analytical techniques that should be used in a stability study. Some perspectives in these areas can be obtained by reading the comprehensive review by Meites [84], the paper by P. Wessels et al. [85], and the section on statistical considerations in the stability guidelines published by FDA in 1987 [86] and in the more recent Guidance for Industry published in June 1998 [87],... 

Procedures are described for determining the states of phosphorylation and/or activity of several translation factors, and of kinases that phosphorylate them. We also outline procedures for assessing the states of activation of relevant signaling pathways. In addition, we provide guidelines on using small molecule inhibitors to assess the involvement of specific signaling pathways in controlling translation factors and protein synthesis. 

The purpose of a what-if/checklist analysis is to identify hazards, consider the types of accidents that can occur in a process or activity, evaluate in a qualitative manner the consequences of these accidents, and determine whether the safety levels against these potential accident scenarios appear adequate. The what-if/checklist analysis is described in detail in Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures (CCPS, 1992). 

The method used for the safe installation of pressure relief devices is illustrated in Figure 8-1. The first step in the procedure is to specify where relief devices must be installed. Definitive guidelines are available. Second, the appropriate relief device type must be selected. The type depends mostly on the nature of the material relieved and the relief characteristics required. Third, scenarios are developed that describe the various ways in which a relief can occur. The motivation is to determine the material mass flow rate through the relief and the physical state of the material (liquid, vapor, or two phases). Next, data are collected on the relief process, including physical properties of the ejected material, and the relief is sized. Finally, the worst-case scenario is selected and the final relief design is achieved. 

Consideration of the provisions of PAG guideline number 7 determined test procedure, to be described, and also the... 

The possibility of contamination of patients may be determined in the field, en route to a treatment facility, or at a treatment facility, depending on the condition of the patients. The facility receiving the patients should be informed of the estimated number of casualties, the natures of their injuries, and details on any suspected contamination that may be present. Injured personnel should be sorted and treated according to standard medical guidelines. If possible, individuals suspected of being contaminated should be separated from other patients and receive preliminary decontamination prior to treatment (see Section 7.3 for decontamination procedures). 

The protocol sets out guidelines for the implementation of internal quality control (IQC) in analytical laboratories. IQC is one of a number of concerted measures that analytical chemists can take to ensure that the data produced in the laboratory are fit for their intended purpose. In practice, fitness for purpose is determined by a comparison of the accuracy achieved in a laboratory at a given time with a required level of accuracy. Internal quality control therefore comprises the routine practical procedures that enable the analytical chemist to accept a result or group of results as fit-for-purpose, or... 

In order to execute the provisions of the German law, directives have been issued which, while stated to be guidelines, have, in effect, the force of the law itself. These directives spell out procedures for determining the compensation to which inventor-employees are entitled. The factors taken into consideration are the value of the invention, the... 

---