Chemical process quantitative risk analysis

Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis Process Equipment Reliability Data, with Data Tables Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety (Plant)... 

FIGt 26-58 Nomograph to determine the downwind distance affected hy a release. Adapted from Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 1989, p. 90. Used hy permission of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers.)... 

A complete analysis of dense gas dispersion is much beyond the scope of this treatise. More detailed references are available (Britter and McQuaid, Workbook on the Dispersion of Dense Gases, Health and Safety Executive Report No. 17/1988, England, 1988 Lees, 1986, pp. 455 61 Hanna and Drivas, 1987 Workbook of Test Cases for Vapor Cloud Source Dispersion Models, AlChE, 1989 Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 1989, pp. 96-103). 

Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, Second Edition, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, 2000. 

CPQRA Chemical process quantitative risk analysis... 

The acronym for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. It is the process of hazard identification followed by numerical evaluation of incident consequences and frequencies, and their combination into an overall measure of risk when applied to the chemical process industry. It is particularly applied to episodic events. It differs from, but is related to, a probabilistic risk analysis (PRA), a quantitative tool used in the nuclear industry... 

A program of research has been supported for several years by the United Kingdom Health Safety Executive (HSE) to address the effects of sociotechnical factors on risk in the CPI. The initial emphasis of this work was to develop a methodology so that chemical process quantitative risk analysis (CPQRA) would take into accotmt the effects of the quality of the management factors of plant being assessed. This work has been described in a series of publications (e.g., Bellamy et al., 1990 Hurst et al., 1991 Geyer et al., 1990 and Hurst et al., 1992). 

For application in chemical process quantitative risk analysis (CPQRA), the hierarchical format of HTA enables the analyst to choose the level of event breakdown for which data are likely to be available. This is useful for human reliability quantification (see the discussion in Chapter 5). 

GUIDELINES FOR CHEMICAL PROCESS QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS... 

Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis (CPQRA Guidelines) builds on the earlier work to show the engineer how to make quantitative estimates of the risk of the hazards identified. The quantitative estimates can identify the major contributors to risk. They can also help to define the most effective ways to a safer process by indicating relative risk reduction from proposed alternate process safeguards and measures. 

Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis(CPQRA) The numerical evaluation of both incident consequences and probabilities or frequencies and their combination into an overall measure of risk. 

CPQRA Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis... 

Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , Center for Chemical Process Safely, AIChE, New York City, 1989. 

Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis", 2 " Edition CCPS, AICliE, New York City, 2000. 

This chapter provides general information for performing qualitative or quantitative risk assessments on buildings in process plants. For detailed guidance on risk assessment techniques, the user is referred to other CCPS books on this subject, including Reference 3, Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, Second Edition, and Reference 4, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis. 

GENERAL References AICHE/CCI S Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2d ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 2000. AICHE/CCPS, Guidelines for Hazards Evaluation Procedures, 2d ed., American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, 1992. Crowl and Louver, Chemical Process Safety Fundamentals with Applications, 2d ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 2002. Mannan, Lees Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 3d ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam. 

The methodology outlined in this chapter follows that in Cuidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis (CCPS, 2000). NFPA 550 Cu/de to the Fire Safety Concept Tree provides another example of fire risk assessment. There are three keys to a successful fire risk assessment ... 

---