Limits of quantitation

The limit of quantitation (LOQ) of a method is also given as a quantity of substance or concentration in the substance domain. This limit incorporates the calibration and thus also the uncertainty (error consideration) of the measurements (Ebel and Kamm 1983). Unlike the LOD it is guaranteed statistically and gives the lower limiting concentration which can be unambiguously determined quantitatively. It can differ significantly from the blank value (Montag, 1982 ISO 11843,1997). 

As a component can be determined only after it has been detected, the LOQ cannot be lower than the LOD. As there is a relative uncertainty in the result of about 100% at a concentration of a substance corresponding to the LOD in an analysis sample, the LOQ must be correspondingly higher than the LOD, depending on the requirement (Ligure 3.160). 

The calibration function is defined exclusively within the working range given by the experimental calibration. GC-MS systems achieve very low LODs so that, at a correspondingly dense collection of calibration points near the blank value, a nonlinear area is described. This area can be caused by unavoidable active sites (residual activities) in the system and swallows up a small but constant quantity of substance. Such a calibration function tends to approach the a -axis before reaching the origin. 

Important aspects regarding the optimization of a calibration can be derived from the facts discussed here  

The precision of an analysis at or near the detection limit is usually poor compared with the precision at higher concentrations. This makes the uncertainty in the detection limit and in concentrations slightly above the detection limit also high. For this reason, many regulatory agencies define another limit, the LOQ, which is higher than the LOD and should have better precision. 

The LOQ is the lowest concentration of analyte in a sample that can be determined quantitatively with a given accuracy and precision using the stated method. The LOQ is usually defined as that concentration equivalent to an S/N ratio of 10/1. The LOQ can also be determined from the standard deviation of the blank the LOQ is lOx the standard deviation of the blank, expressed in coneentration units. The LOQ is stated with the appropriate accuracy and precision and should be validated by running standards at concentrations that can confirm the ability of the method to determine analyte with the required accuracy and precision at the LOQ. 

Analytical results that fall between the LOD and the LOQ should be reported as detected but not qnantifiable. These results are only estimates of the amount of analyte present, since by definition, they cannot be determined quantitatively. 

Define determinate error and give two examples of determinate errors. 

In preparing a sample solution for analysis, the pipette used actually delivered 4.92 mL instead of the 5.00 mL it was supposed to deliver. Would this cause determinate or indeterminate error in the analysis of this sample  

---

As shown in Figure 4.12c, the limit of identification is selected such that there is an equal probability of type 1 and type 2 errors. The American Chemical Society s Committee on Environmental Analytical Chemistry recommends the limit of quantitation, (Sa)loq> which is defined as ... 

The method limit of quantitation and limit of detection must be determined as well as the limit of linearity. The limit of quantitation is defined as the level at which the measurement is quantitatively meaningful the limit of detection is the level at which the measurement is larger than the uncertainty and the limit of linearity is the upper level of the measurement rehabihty (39). These limits are determined by plotting concentration vs response. 

As result of the carried out investigations the method of GC detection of pyrethriods in air is developed, providing limits of quantitative detenuination from 0.0005 up to 0.005 mg/m. ... 

Interaction of formaldehyde with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine in acid media causes 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazone (DNPhydrazone) formaldehyde formation. Gas-chromatographic analysis of 2,4-DNP-hydrazone formaldehyde toluene extract with an electron holding detector makes it possible to detect it at the level of 0,001 mg/dm. Phenol is detected in the form of tribromphenol yield, the hexane extract of which undergoes chromatography with an electron holding detector which provides the level of phenol detection of 0.001 mg/dm (the limit of quantitative detection). 

Accuracy and precision Specificity Limit of detection Limit of quantitation Linearity and range... 

Analyte present but below the method limit of quantitation Average concentration of several samples (standard deviation)... 

Limit of quantitation The smallest quantity of an analyte that can be determined with accuracy and precision. 

CL is inserted in Eqs. (2.18) and (2.19), with k - oo, and using the + sign. The intercept of the horizontal with the lower confidence limit function of the regression line defines the limit of quantitation, jcloq, any value above which would be quoted as 2f(y ) t s ... 

Legend No number of measurement. Cone concentration in fig, CN"/100 ml Absorb absorbance [AU] slope slope of regression line t CV intercept see slope res. std. dev. residual standard deviation Srts -n number of points in regression LOD limit of detection LOQ limit of quantitation measurements using a 2-fold higher sample amount and 5-cm cuvettes—i.e., measured absorption 0. .. 0.501 was divided by 10. 

Determine the limit of detection LOD and limit of quantitation LOQ according to the interpolation at level y = a + CL of the regression line and its lower CL this is sensitive to the calibration-point pattern ... 

Positive identification of low-ppb (pg/L) levels of endosulfan in human blood has been achieved by GC equipped with a microcoulometric detector (GC/MC) (Griffith and Blanke 1974). Although GC/MC is specific and nearly as sensitive as GC/ECD for detecting endosulfan in blood, GC/MC is more difficult to operate. Both isomers of endosulfan can be measured in blood using a method described by Guardino et al. (1996). According to the authors, endosulfan can be recovered and measured with an approximate limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.2 pg/L (sub-ppb). 

Recoveries, limit of quantitation, and limit of detection Calculation of residues Important points... 

Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry Lower limit of detection Limit of detection Limit of quantitation Florseshoe crab hemocyanin Liquid scintillation counting Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ ionization mass spectrometry m -Maleimidobenzoy 1-A -Hydroxysuccinimide 1 -Cyclohexyl-3-(2-Morptiolino-ethyl)carbodiimide rnetlio-/ -Toluenesulfonate (same as CDI)... 

The limit of determination [or limit of quantitation (LOQ)] is defined in Directive 96/46/EC as the lowest concentration tested at which an acceptable mean recovery (normally 70-110%) and acceptable relative standard deviation (normally <20%) are obtained. The specific requirements for LOQ in crops, food, feed, soil, drinking and surface water, air, body fluids, and tissues are described in Section 4. Because the abbreviation LOD usually means limit of detection rather than limit of determination, the authors prefer not to use this abbreviation here in order to avoid confusion, and LOQ is used throughout. According to Directive 96/46/EC no data with regard to the limit of detection must be given. 

Table 5 Relation between the maximum residue Umit (MRL) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ)...

The LOQ must take into account relevant health based limit values or relevant exposure levels. In SANCO/825/00 a method to calculate a relevant health based limit is given. The limit of quantitation must be equal to or lower than the concentration C, which is defined by equation (1). 

The required limit of quantitation (LOQ) and limit of detection (LOD) have been extended to the parts per billion range as the European Community (EC) baby food -related guideline and the US consumer basket requirements became effective. 

Adequate sensitivity should be demonstrated and estimates of the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) should be provided. The slope of the calibration line may indicate the ability of the method to distinguish the tme analyte concentration. The LOD of a method is the lowest analyte concentration that produces a reproducible response detectable above the noise level of the system. The LOQ is the lowest level of analyte that can be accurately and precisely measured. For a regulatory method, quantitation is limited by the lowest calibration standard. The techniques for these estimations should be described. 

Residue study protocols typically either include quality specifications for analytical procedures or refer to a written analytical method that includes such specifications. The protocol for an LSMBS should also include analytical quality specifications, either directly or by reference to a method. Analytical specifications usually include minimum and maximum recovery of analyte from fortified control samples, minimum number of such fortifications per set of samples, minimum linearity in calibration, minimum stability of response to injection of calibration solutions, and limits of quantitation and of detection. 

Each commodity required a specifically customized workbook, containing a worksheet for each analyte determined in the commodity. Each laboratory received electronic copies of either three or four workbooks, which served as templates for the three or four commodities assigned to the laboratory. Each set of up to 10 commodity samples scheduled for colleetion and analysis required the creation of a copy of the appropriate template. Each workbook template contained one primary worksheet for each analyte, in which analytical data were recorded and residue levels were calculated, as described below. Eor example, the template for green beans contained 17 primary worksheets, one for each of the 17 analytes determined in each green bean sample. Additional worksheets were inserted into copies of the template as needed, to describe results of further analyses, such as confirmation of analytes present above the limit of quantitation (LOQ) or dilutions to bring the concentration of the analyte into the calibration range. 

Sensitivity is a measure of the smallest concentration that can be either measured [limit of detection (LOD)] or accurately quantitated [limit of quantitation (LOQ)]. In the USA, the method for measuring LOD or LOQ is left up to the method developer. European requirements for determining LOD and LOQ are very specific the LOD is based on the mean plus three standard deviations for 20 control blank samples, and the LOQ is defined as the lowest concentration giving an acceptable CV. 

The limit of detection (LOD) is an important criterion of the efficiency of an analytical method. It is characterized by the smallest value of the concentration of a compound in the analytical sample. The detectable amount of anilide compounds is in the range 0.01-0.5 ng by GC and 0.1 ng by HPLC. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) ranges from 0.005 to 0.01 mg kg for vegetables, fruits and crops. The recoveries from untreated plant matrices with fortification levels between 10 and 50 times the LOD and the LOQ are 70-120%. The relative standard deviation (RSD) at 10-50 times the level of the LOD and LOQ are <10 % and <20%, respectively. 

The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were statistically determined in alfalfa and clover raw agricultural commodities (rotational crops). The method LOD and LOQ for the EMA-producing metabolite were 0.004 and 0.012 mg kg respectively, and the LOD and LOQ for the HEMA-producing metabolite were 0.004 and 0.014mgkg respectively, for the alfalfa and clover... 

At least four chromatographic standards prepared at concentrations equivalent to 50-70% of the limit of quantitation (LOQ) up to the maximum levels of analytes expected in the samples should be prepared and analyzed concurrently with the samples. In LC/MS/MS analysis, the first injection should be that of a standard or reagent blank and should be discarded. Then, the lowest standard should be injected, followed by two to four blanks, control samples, fortifications or investigation samples, followed by another chromatographic standard. This sequence is then repeated until all the samples have been injected. The last injection should be that of a standard. In order to permit unattended analysis of a normal analysis set, we recommend that samples and standards be made up in aqueous solutions of ammonium acetate (ca 5 mM) with up to 25% of an organic modifier such as acetonitrile or methanol if needed. In addition, use of a chilled autosampler maintained at 4 °C provides additional prevention of degradation during analysis. 

The MDCs are estimated from an S/N of the diphenyl ether peaks of at least of 3 in the recovery test. With fortification levels between 0.2 and 0.5mgkg recoveries of bifenox from brown rice matrices ranged from 85 to 102% with the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) being 0.010 mg kg according to the analytical method of the Notification of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. By the residue analysis method described in Section 2.2.2(3), recoveries of chlornitrofen and CNP-NH2 from brown rice and vegetables with fortification levels of 0.04-0.10 mg kg ranged from 82 to 98%. The LOD for each sample was 0.005 mg kg for chlornitrofen and CNP-NH2. ... 

---