Chemist analytical

Indicators that change color at pH lower than 7 are useful in determining the equivalence point of strong-acid/weak-base titrations. Methyl orange is an example of this type. The equivalence point of a strong-acid/ weak-base titration is acidic because the salt formed is itself a weak acid. Thus the salt solution has a pH lower than 7 at the equivalence point. 

Indicators that change color at pH higher than 7 are usefiil in determining the equivalence point of weak-acid/strong-base titrations. Phenol-phthalein is an example. These reactions produce salt solutions whose pH is greater than 7. This occurs because the salt formed is a weak base. 

You may be wondering what type of indicator is used to determine the equivalence point of weak-acid/weak-base titrations. The surprising answer is none at all. The pH at the equivalence point of a weak-acid/ weak-base titration could be acidic, basic, or neutral, depending on the relative acid-base strengths. Because the pH value does not change dramatically as the equivalence point is approached, it is not practical to carry out weak-acid/weak-base titrations. 

End Point Indicators change color at the end point of a titration with a base. 

Strong Acid Titrated with Strong Base 

---

We begin our discussion of nanocrystals in diis chapter widi die most challenging problem faced in die field die preparation and characterization of nanocrystals. These systems present challenging problems for inorganic and analytical chemists alike, and die success of any nanocrystal syndiesis plays a major role in die furdier quantitative study of nanocrystal properties. Next, we will address die unique size-dependent optical properties of bodi metal and semiconductor nanocrystals. Indeed, it is die striking size-dependent colours of nanocrystals diat first attracted... 

Caulcutt, R., and R. Boddy, Statistics for Analytical Chemists, Chapman and Hall, London, 1983. Dixon, W. J., and F. J. Massey, Introduction to Statistical Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969. 

Miller, J. C., and J. N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemists, Halsted Press, John Wiley, New York, 1984. 

Training in each of these fields provides a unique perspective to the study of chemistry. Undergraduate chemistry courses and textbooks are more than a collection of facts they are a kind of apprenticeship. In keeping with this spirit, this text introduces the field of analytical chemistry and the unique perspectives that analytical chemists bring to the study of chemistry. 

Attributed to C. N. Reilley (1925-1981) on receipt of the 1965 Fisher Award in Analytical Chemistry. ReiUey, who was a professor of chemistry at the University of North Carolina at Chapel HiU, was one of the most influential analytical chemists of the last half of the twentieth century. 

You will come across numerous examples of qualitative and quantitative methods in this text, most of which are routine examples of chemical analysis. It is important to remember, however, that nonroutine problems prompted analytical chemists to develop these methods. Whenever possible, we will try to place these methods in their appropriate historical context. In addition, examples of current research problems in analytical chemistry are scattered throughout the text. 

Having noted that each field of chemistry brings a unique perspective to the study of chemistry, we now ask a second deceptively simple question. What is the analytical perspective Many analytical chemists describe this perspective as an analytical approach to solving problems. Although there are probably as many descriptions of the analytical approach as there are analytical chemists, it is convenient for our purposes to treat it as a five-step process ... 

Figure 1.3 shows an outline of the analytical approach along with some important considerations at each step. Three general features of this approach deserve attention. First, steps 1 and 5 provide opportunities for analytical chemists to collaborate with individuals outside the realm of analytical chemistry. In fact, many problems on which analytical chemists work originate in other fields. Second, the analytical approach is not linear, but incorporates a feedback loop consisting of steps 2, 3, and 4, in which the outcome of one step may cause a reevaluation of the other two steps. Finally, the solution to one problem often suggests a new problem. 

In Section lA we indicated that analytical chemistry is more than a collection of qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. Nevertheless, many problems on which analytical chemists work ultimately involve either a qualitative or quantitative measurement. Other problems may involve characterizing a sample s chemical or physical properties. Finally, many analytical chemists engage in fundamental studies of analytical methods. In this section we briefly discuss each of these four areas of analysis. 

Analytical chemists work to improve the ability of all chemists to make meaningful measurements. Chemists working in medicinal chemistry, clinical chemistry, forensic chemistry, and environmental chemistry, as well as the more traditional areas of chemistry, need better tools for analyzing materials. The need to work with smaller quantities of material, with more complex materials, with processes occurring on shorter time scales, and with species present at lower concentrations challenges analytical... 

Typical problems on which analytical chemists work include qualitative analyses (what is present ), quantitative analyses (how much is present ), characterization analyses (what are the material s chemical and physical properties ), and fundamental analyses (how does this method work and how can it be improved ). 

The role of analytical chemistry within the broader discipline of chemistry has been discussed by many prominent analytical chemists. Several notable examples follow. 

Tyson, J. Analysis What Analytical Chemists Do. Royal Society of Chemistry Cambridge, England, 1988. 

Analytical chemistry is inherently a quantitative science. Whether determining the concentration of a species in a solution, evaluating an equilibrium constant, measuring a reaction rate, or drawing a correlation between a compound s structure and its reactivity, analytical chemists make measurements and perform calculations. In this section we briefly review several important topics involving the use of numbers in analytical chemistry. 

Analytical chemists use a variety of glassware to measure volume, several examples of which are shown in Figure 2.4. The type of glassware used depends on how exact the volume needs to be. Beakers, dropping pipets, and graduated cylinders are used to measure volumes approximately, typically with errors of several percent. 

Analytical chemists converse using terminology that conveys specific meaning to other analytical chemists. To discuss and learn analytical chemistry you must first understand its language. You are probably already familiar with some analytical terms, such as "accuracy and "precision, but you may not have placed them in their appropriate analytical context. Other terms, such as "analyte and "matrix, may be less familiar. This chapter introduces many important terms routinely used by analytical chemists. Becoming comfortable with these terms will make the material in the chapters that follow easier to read and understand. 

Analytical chemists make a distinction between calibration and standardization. Calibration ensures that the equipment or instrument used to measure the signal is operating correctly by using a standard known to produce an exact signal. Balances, for example, are calibrated using a standard weight whose mass can be traced to the internationally accepted platinum-iridium prototype kilogram. 

Every discipline has its own terminology. Your success in studying analytical chemistry will improve if you master the language used by analytical chemists. Be sure that you understand the difference between an analyte and its matrix, a technique and a method, a procedure and a protocol, and a total analysis technique and a concentration technique. 

Analytical chemists make a distinction between error and uncertainty Error is the difference between a single measurement or result and its true value. In other words, error is a measure of bias. As discussed earlier, error can be divided into determinate and indeterminate sources. Although we can correct for determinate error, the indeterminate portion of the error remains. Statistical significance testing, which is discussed later in this chapter, provides a way to determine whether a bias resulting from determinate error might be present. 

Anderson, R. L. Practical Statistics for Analytical Chemists. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York, 1987. 

These data are adapted from Steiner, E. H. Planning and Analysis of Results of Collaborative Tests published in Statistical Manual of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Analytical Chemists Washington, DC, 1975. 

Official Methods of Analysis, 11th ed.. Association of Official Analytic Chemists, Washington, DC, 1970, p. 475. 

The response surfaces in Figure 14.2 are plotted for a limited range of factor levels (0 < A < 10, 0 < B < 10), but can be extended toward more positive or more negative values. This is an example of an unconstrained response surface. Most response surfaces of interest to analytical chemists, however, are naturally constrained by the nature of the factors or the response or are constrained by practical limits set by the analyst. The response surface in Figure 14.1, for example, has a natural constraint on its factor since the smallest possible concentration for the analyte is zero. Furthermore, an upper limit exists because it is usually undesirable to extrapolate a calibration curve beyond the highest concentration standard. 

The design of a collaborative test must provide the additional information needed to separate the effect of random error from that due to systematic errors introduced by the analysts. One simple approach, which is accepted by the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, is to have each analyst analyze two samples, X and Y, that are similar in both matrix and concentration of analyte. The results obtained by each analyst are plotted as a single point on a two-sample chart, using the result for one sample as the x-coordinate and the value for the other sample as the -coordinate. ... 

Agency. A second example of an external method of quality assessment is the voluntary participation of the laboratory in a collaborative test (Chapter 14) sponsored by a professional organization such as the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Finally, individuals contracting with a laboratory can perform their own external quality assessment by submitting blind duplicate samples and blind standard samples to the laboratory for analysis. If the results for the quality assessment samples are unacceptable, then there is good reason to consider the results suspect for other samples provided by the laboratory. 

The textbook s organization can be divided into four parts. Chapters 1-3 serve as an introduction, providing an overview of analytical chemistry (Chapter 1) a review of the basic tools of analytical chemistry, including significant figures, units, and stoichiometry (Chapter 2) and an introduction to the terminology used by analytical chemists (Chapter 3). Familiarity with the material in these chapters is assumed throughout the remainder of the text. 

Finally, the textbook concludes with two chapters discussing the design and maintenance of analytical methods, two topics of importance to analytical chemists. Chapter 14 considers the development of an analytical method, including its optimization, verification, and validation. Quality control and quality assessment are discussed in Chapter 15. 

Association of Official Analytical Chemists American Oil Chemists Society... 

In the United States the analytical methods approved by most states are ones developed under the auspices of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (3). Penalties for analytical deviation from guaranteed analyses vary, even from state to state within the United States (4). The legally accepted analytical procedures, in general, detect the solubiUty of nitrogen and potassium in water and the solubiUty of phosphoms in a specified citrate solution. Some very slowly soluble nutrient sources, particularly of nitrogen, are included in some specialty fertilizers such as turf fertilizers. The slow solubihty extends the period of effectiveness and reduces leaching losses. In these cases, the proportion and nature of the specialty source must be detailed on the labeling. 

---