Physical properties, measurement pressure measurements

This device is similar to the delta tube used to generate vapor for various applications, including physical property (vapor pressure) measurements and filter testing. This larger version is shown schematically in Figure 4.4. Comprised of concentric glass and ceramic tubes up to 5 cm in diameter and 15 cm long, it has been used to... 

Physical Methods that have been Used to Monitor Reaction Kinetics. In this section some physical property measurements of general utility are discussed. One of the oldest and most useful techniques used in kinetics studies involves the measurement of the total pressure in an isothermal constant volume reactor. This technique is primarily used to follow the course of homogeneous gas phase reactions that involve a change in the total number of gaseous molecules present in the reaction vessel (e.g., the hydrogenation of propylene). 

In tile next section we cover the major types of measurement devices used in the process industries, principally the big five measurements temperature, flow rate, pressure, level, and composition, along with online physical property measurement techniques. Table 8-8 summarizes the different options under each of the principal measurements. 

Determination of Important Parameters in Surfactant Design. Recent work (Chapters 8 and 9) demonstrates the utility of correlating test results with surfactant structures. But as the complexities of pore level mechanisms, dispersion properties, and fluid behavior become better understood, it is also becoming increasingly clear that a variety of physical property measurements will be required for advanced surfactant design. Many of these measurements will be needed at pressures (ca. 10 MPa) that are characteristic of gas-flood conditions. 

The shear and compressional acoustic wave velocities for the inner core are the direct output parameters from seismological observations. In order to make a direct comparison between the seismic data and measured physical properties, measurements of the acoustic velocities for iron at core pressures are required. Only very recently has it become possible to measure the elastic constants of s-Fe at high pressures and room temperature (Mao etal., 1999 Lubbers etal., 2000 Fiquet et al., 2001 Anderson et at, 2001). Recent advances in theory and computational methods have also provided new tools for computing the elastic constants of s-Fe at core pressures (Stixrude and Cohen, 1995 Soderhnd et al., 1996 Cohen et al., 1997 Steinle-Neumann and Stixrude, 1999) and core conditions (Laio et al., 2000 Steinle-Neumann et al, 2001 Alfe et al., 2001). There is considerable disagreement on the elastic constants of s-Fe between experimental results and theoretical calculations. The dilferences in the aggregate shear (FJ and compressional (Vp) wave velocities are smaller (Hemley and Mao, 2001 Steinle-Neumann et ai, 2001). Further improvement of theory and experiment is required to resolve the discrepancies. 

Ultrasonic interferometry, in which the travel time of high-frequency elastic waves through a sample is measured, also yields elastic moduli. Because it is a physical property measurement, rather than an optical spectroscopy, it can be used equally well on poly-crystalline samples as single-crystals, although polycrystalline measurements only yield the bulk elastic properties, bulk modulus and shear modulus, G. High-pressure ultrasonic interferometry techniques were initially developed in the piston cylinder... 

Determination of crystal structure or unit cell volume in isolation of other physical property measurements is the routine practice in much of solid state research under both ambient and non-ambient conditions. This is often necessitated because the cell assemblies required for property measurements are not compatible with X-ray beams typically available in the laboratory. Centralized facilities, such as are available at the synchrotron, provide a cost-effective environment and opportunity to do more definitive experiments. One recent example from the Stony Brook laboratories will suffice to demonstrate what will become, I believe, the normal mode of operation for the study of important phase transitions in the future. For the study of mantle mineralogy, simultaneous measurements of elastic properties, structure and pressure is now established in large volume devices, (Chen et al. 1999) and being established in DACs as well... 

Plate efficiencies and HETP values are complex functions of measurable physical properties temperature, pressure, composition, density, viscosity, diflusivity, and surface tension measurable hydrodynamic factors pressure drop and liquid and vapor flow rates plus factors that cannot be predicted or measured accurately foaming tendency, liquid and gas turbulence, bubble and droplet sizes, flow oscillations, emulsification, contact time, froth formation, and others. Values for plate efficiency, HETP, or HTU, particularly those that purport to compare various devices, are usually taken over a limited range of concentration and liquid-to-vapor ratios. The crossovers in Fig. 2.5 and the rather strange behavior of the ethyl alcohol-water system, Fig. 2.6, demonstrate the critical need for test data under expected operating conditions. ... 

For initiation in micelles, the emulsifier concentration must exceed the cmc. The classical concept of the cmc is that it represents that concentration at which micelles form at higher concentrations, more micelles form, and at lower concentrations, no micelles are present. The cmc is usually determined by the inflection point in some physical property measured as a function of emulsifier concentration. Figure 1 shows a schematic illustration of the variation of conductivity k, turbidity t, equivalent conductivity X, surface tension y, and osmotic pressure tt with sodium dodecyl sulfate concentration (18). All five parameters show an inflection point at ca. 8mM, which is the most common value of the cmc, and all five curves are consistent with the concept of micelles forming above ca. 8mM and not forming at lower concentrations. Recent measurements of the partial specific volume of sodium lau-ryl sulfate solutions (19), however, suggest that aggregates of lauryl sulfate ions are present of concentrations well below the cmc. 

The history of a-U is a long and complicated saga that merits a special review (Fisher, Lander, and Bader, to be published). Reviews on the elastic-constant anomalies (Fisher 1974), superconductivity (Smith and Fisher 1973), and structural effects discovered up to 1984 (Smith and Lander 1984) are already available. Briefly, all physical-property measurements show an anomaly at 43 K, and many show subsequent anomalies at 37 and 22 K. The phase diagram under pressure of a-U is given in fig, 2. At low temperature, i.e. below the solid line, a-U is a superconductor. Assigning the phases a, a2, as we have done in the caption in fig. 2, may not be correct since, strictly speaking, the phase boundaries have been determined at zero pressure... 

Con osition and Physical Properties Many composition measurements are obtained indirecdy. Physical properties such as temperature, viscosity, vapor pressure, electric conductivity, density, and refractive index are measured and used to infer the conposition of a stream, in place of a direct measurement. A number of other measurement techniques have become commonplace for the on-line analysis of composition. These include gas chromatography and mass and infrared spectrometry. These instruments are very accurate but are expensive and often fail to provide the continuous measurements that are required for rapid regulation. 

Tack is a term that is difficult to define in specific terms. Tack frequently represents a combination of many physical properties. Measurement of tack by application of finger pressure, a common technique, is obviously not quantitative. In adhesives technology, tack may be defined as the property of a material which enables it to form a bond of measurable strength immediately upon contact with another surface, usually with low applied pressure. Tack is thus instantaneous adhesion and differs... 

Of all physical property measurements, those dealing with vapor pressures are the most typical. Such information is available for a large number of commonly encountered compounds either as measured values or as correlations of them (Daubert and Danner Reid et al). 

The common physical properties of acetyl chloride ate given in Table 1. The vapor pressure has been measured (2,7), but the experimental difficulties ate considerable. An equation has been worked out to represent the heat capacity (8), and the thermodynamic ideal gas properties have been conveniently organized (9). 

During the nineteenth century the growth of thermodynamics and the development of the kinetic theory marked the beginning of an era in which the physical sciences were given a quantitative foundation. In the laboratory, extensive researches were carried out to determine the effects of pressure and temperature on the rates of chemical reactions and to measure the physical properties of matter. Work on the critical properties of carbon dioxide and on the continuity of state by van der Waals provided the stimulus for accurate measurements on the compressibiUty of gases and Hquids at what, in 1885, was a surprisingly high pressure of 300 MPa (- 3,000 atmor 43,500 psi). This pressure was not exceeded until about 1912. 

Vacuum gauges may be broadly classified as either direct or indirect (10). Direct gauges measure pressure as force pet unit area. Indirect gauges measure a physical property, such as thermal conductivity or ionisation potential, known to change in a predictable manner with the molecular density of the gas. 

Process Measurements. The most commonly measured process variables are pressures, flows, levels, and temperatures (see Flow LffiASURELffiNT Liquid-levell asurel nt PressureLffiASURELffiNT Temperaturel asurel nt). When appropriate, other physical properties, chemical properties, and chemical compositions are also measured. The selection of the proper instmmentation for a particular appHcation is dependent on factors such as the type and nature of the fluid or soHd involved relevant process conditions rangeabiHty, accuracy, and repeatabiHty requited response time installed cost and maintainabiHty and reHabiHty. Various handbooks are available that can assist in selecting sensors (qv) for particular appHcations (14—16). 

There are many ways to measure these properties and some of them are proprietary. However, most laboratory tests are standardized by American Standard Testing Methods (ASTM). Many of them are interactive to various degrees. The rate and state of vulcanization is especially important to consider for components of heavier and thicker tines. The heat used to vulcanize the tine in a mold under pressure requites time to penetrate from both sides of the giant tine to the innermost portions. Securing a balanced state of cure, ie, the maximizing of physical properties in all the components, results in the innermost components having a faster rate of cure. The peripheral compounds should have a cure system which holds its physical properties well when overcured. 

An extensive pesticide properties database was compiled, which includes six physical properties, ie, solubiUty, half-life, soil sorption, vapor pressure, acid pR and base pR for about 240 compounds (4). Because not all of the properties have been measured for all pesticides, some values had to be estimated. By early 1995, the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) had developed a computerized pesticide property database containing 17 physical properties for 330 pesticide compounds. The primary user of these data has been the USDA s Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) for leaching models to advise farmers on any combination of soil and pesticide properties that could potentially lead to substantial groundwater contamination. 

Important physical properties of catalysts include the particle size and shape, surface area, pore volume, pore size distribution, and strength to resist cmshing and abrasion. Measurements of catalyst physical properties (43) are routine and often automated. Pores with diameters <2.0 nm are called micropores those with diameters between 2.0 and 5.0 nm are called mesopores and those with diameters >5.0 nm are called macropores. Pore volumes and pore size distributions are measured by mercury penetration and by N2 adsorption. Mercury is forced into the pores under pressure entry into a pore is opposed by surface tension. For example, a pressure of about 71 MPa (700 atm) is required to fill a pore with a diameter of 10 nm. The amount of uptake as a function of pressure determines the pore size distribution of the larger pores (44). In complementary experiments, the sizes of the smallest pores (those 1 to 20 nm in diameter) are deterrnined by measurements characterizing desorption of N2 from the catalyst. The basis for the measurement is the capillary condensation that occurs in small pores at pressures less than the vapor pressure of the adsorbed nitrogen. The smaller the diameter of the pore, the greater the lowering of the vapor pressure of the Hquid in it. 

---