Safety testing procedures

Safety of the product itself for the target organism, the user (who applies it) or the environment is addressed by a range of preclinical and clinical assessments which depend on the product and its use pattern. The range of safety features to be assessed includes local and systemic tolerance, acute and chronic toxicity, mutagenicity and tumorigenicity, reproductive toxicity, immunotoxicity and, for veterinary medicinal products, also the ecotoxicity. The safety tests will be described in more detail in a separate chapter below on preclinical pharmacological and safety test procedures. 

Safety testing procedures have been selected and the majority of the unique test fixturing has been fabricated. 

Continue development of safety testing procedures and conduct initial tests on the CCH 0 composition. 

The testing and evaluation of vehicle-based safety has been a standardized process for passive safety during the last decades. For active safety, testing procedures and evaluation methods have become standard only in the field of autonomous stabilization of the vehicle. More recent functions, such as rear-end collision warnings, are still subject to a variety of evaluation schemes. Standardization in terms of methods, tools, and procedures has started only recently and will take probably years for final harmonization. 

As part of the detailed design of each safety interlock, written test procedures must be developed for the following purposes ... 

Arrester Testing and Standards Regulatory and approval agencies and insurers impose acceptance testing requirements, sometimes as part of certification standards. The user may also request testing to demonstrate specific performance needs, just as the manufacturer can help develop standards. These interrelationships have resulted in several new and updated performance test procedures. Listing of an arrester by a testing laboratoiy refers only to performance under a defined set of test conditions. The flame arrester user should develop specific application requirements based on the service involved and the safety and risk criteria adopted. 

Test demands Periodic equipment testing is an important source of demands, especially for safety system components that are often in a standby state. A review of the test procedures can be performed to obtain this information if it is not recorded in the maintenance records. 

After pipework has been installed, it is essential that it be tested for soundness and purged, as required by Regulation 21 of the Gas Safety (Installation and Use) Regulations. Detailed procedures for these two operations are given in the British Gas publications Purging Procedures for Non-Domestic Gas Installations (lM/2) and Soundness Testing Procedures for Non-Domestic Gas Installations (lM/5). 

One of the few phytochemicals that has been subjected to the rigorous testing procedures required by food safety authorities is P-carotene, a naturally-occurring carotenoid that is also a pre-cursor of vitamin A in humans. It is increasingly used as a food colour since the food product can be claimed to contain all natural ingredients. For this reason, detailed toxicological studies were undertaken that enabled the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee for Food Additives (JECFA) to set an ADI of 0-5 mg/kg/bw/day based on a NOAEL of 50 mg/day and the application of an uncertainty factor of 10 (JECFA, 1974). This low factor was used because it was argued that the compound occurred naturally in food, that its use as a food additive would not lead to a substantial increase in the total amount normally consumed, and that there had been no reports of adverse effects in humans. The ADI would correspond to an acceptable intake in humans of up to 350 mg/day. 

Also, the test procedure (protocol) is fundamental because it allows comparing results from different laboratories and from different experimental sets. Moreover, selected test protocol could affect the interpretation of the results, the information content and its application in the safety evaluation process, as stated by Frazer if the biological system is exposed to a test chemical for 24 h and the endpoint assay is immediately conducted, the data produced would be most relevant to the acute toxicity of the test material. If, on the other hand, the system is exposed to material for 24 h and the system is cultured in the absence of the test material for additional 48 h before the endpoint assay is conducted, the data would be more relevant to recovery from toxicity rather than acute toxicity [7]. 

Consumer Safety Regulations are based on test procedures which are scientifically unsound and that they contradict the essentials of composites testing and hazard based fire tests, large scale hazard based tests involving the newer types of combustion modified PU foams with suitable fabrics have shown... 

The starting material will likely be contaminated by intact, viable hepatitis B viral particles (and perhaps additional viruses, such as HIV). This necessitates introduction of stringent purification procedures to ensure complete removal of any intact viral particles from the product stream. A final product QC test to confirm this entails a 6-month safety test on chimpanzees. 

Safety Margins Cooling, Contamination Testing, Procedures, Adequacy... 

Identify and safety test critical equipment and procedures. 

Some would say that this is the current state of the art. Much of the necessary library could be assembled from test systems that have been extensively evaluated and have already undergone extensive validation (Gad, 2000, 2001). Three critical steps must be taken for the eventual fulfillment of these objectives (1) acceptance of a scientific approach to the problem of safety assessment (2) development of an operative validation and acceptance process for new test procedures (3) clear enunciation of an acceptance criterion for new test designs by regulatory authorities. 

SAE Standards Fomm SAE Vehicle Standards - in the early stages of developing standards for safety, performance, reliability and recyclability. Also establish testing procedures. 

SAE has established a Fuel Cells Standard Forum that is chartered with the establishment of standards and test procedures for fuel cell powered vehicles. The committee was established in 1999. The standards will cover the safety, performance, reliability and recyclability of fuel cell systems in vehicles with emphasis on efficiency and environmental impact. The standards will also establish test procedures for uniformity in test results for the vehicle/systems/components performance, and define interface requirements of the systems to the vehicle. Task Groups have been formed in the areas of safety, performance, reliability, emissions, recyclability, interface and miscellaneous. 

As a tool to make mutual acceptance of risk assessments possible, OECD has developed the concept of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The OECD Principles of GLP are an integral part of the 1981 OECD council decision on the Mutual Assessment of Data (MAD) in the Assessment of Chemicals (revised 1997, Section 2.2.2). MAD also harmonizes procedures of GLP compliance monitoring, ensuring that preclinical safety studies are carried out according to the principles of GLP and that countries can have conftdence in the quahty and rigor of safety tests. 

The principles of GLP ensure the generation of high quality and reliable test data related to the safety of industrial chemicals, pesticides, pharmaceuticals, food and feed additives, cosmetics, veterinary drags as well as food additives, in the framework of harmonizing testing procedures for the mutual acceptance of data. 

---