Safety studies

Apart from economic aspects, important demands on chemical plants are that they function faultlessly and meet the required performance, that is, plant availability. Furthermore, they must be safe during normal operation and during disturbances to normal operation. In the ideal case, safety should be an issue at every stage of process development laboratory, miniplant, pilotplant, and industrial operation. The most cost effective solutions are generally developed in the early stages of planning. 

In comparison with other brantdies of industry relatively few disturbances occur in the tliemical industry. However, the potential hazard involved in handling the chemical raw materials and products is relatively high. The substances must generally be handled under conditions of high pressure and temperature, and they are often 

Given today s myriad laws, it is often overlooked that the industry is itself interested in safe and environmentally friendly plants. Only safe and environmentally friendly plants operate economically. Therefore, the chemical industry often employs safety measures that go beyond the requirements of legislation. Their aim is to depict the basic safety technology concept in such a detailed form that specialists without speciflc knowledge of the project can evaluate it [Troster 1985, Eichendorf 2001]. The safety concept of a chemical plant is determined, among others, by the following  

Qualification of the employees Material properties The process Location 

With a view to transparent project execution, it is necessary to expound the most important safety aspects from time to time in a safety study according to the state of progress of the project and to discuss them in an expert group (project team, R D, safety department, engineering), to adopt them, and to document the results. Such a safety study is performed internally for all plants and should not be confused with that required under the extended requirements of the Stbrfallverordnung. In the course of plant planning, three milestones can be recorded [Henne 1994)  

---

Reactor Safety Study An Assessment of Accident Risks in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, Report WASH-1400 (NUREG-75/014), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1975. 

JECEA reviewed the safety studies of glutamate and endorsed its safety by allocating an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) for L-glutamic acid and its monosodium, potassium, ammonium, calcium, and magnesium salts as being "not specified." The scientific committee for food of EC concurred (40). 

Additional discussions are available in the General References concerning the properties of several nitrofiirans. This includes further coverage of the chemotherapeutic and physical properties antimicrobial activity bacterial resistance absorption, distribution, and excretion clinical use and safety studies, of this interesting class of antiinfective compounds. 

Abbott Laboratories, which has conducted additional toxicity and carcinogenicity studies with cyclamate, a 10 1 mixture of cyclamate—saccharin, and cyclohexylamine, claimed to be unable to confirm the 1969 findings. Abbott then filed a food additive petition for cyclamate in 1973, which was denied by the FDA in 1980. In 1982, the Calorie Control Council and Abbott Laboratories filed a second food additive petition containing the results of additional safety studies (73). That petition was stiU pending as of 1996. Cyclamate is, however, allowed for use in any or all three categories, ie, food, beverage, and tabletop, in about 50 countries. Sweet n Low, known in the United States as a saccharin-based table-top sweetener, contains exclusively cyclamate in Canada. 

Investigation of Potential Hazar ds fr om the Oper ations in the Canvey Island/ Thurrock Ar ea, HMSO, London, 1978. Rasmussen, Reactor Safety Study An Assessment of Accident Risk in U.S. Commer cial Nuclear Power Plants, WASH-... 

Describe any prior reactive chemical incidents with these materials. Include previous safety studies. 

The Reactor Safety Study (RSS) directed by Professor Norman Rasmussen of MIT may have had its beginnings in a letter from Senator Pastore to James Schlesinger, AEC Chairman, requesting risk information for the Price-Anderson renewal. The RSS study began in September 1972 with Saul Levine, full-time staff director assisted by John Bewick and Thomas Murley (all AEC). 

The Reactor Safety Study was the most important development in PSA because it ... 

Following the release of WASH-1400, the techniques were disseminated by the authors and interpreters through publications, lectures, and workshops. Many organizations set up in-housc PS. groups, and the nucleus of the organization that had produced the Reactor Safety Study coiKinucd at the NRC. 

The. statement goes on to acknowledge the contribution of the Reactor Safety Study (WASH-1400) to risk quantification but points out that safety goals were not the study objectives and that the uncertainties make it unsuitable for such a purpose. After pointing out that the death I f any individual is not "acceptable," it states two quantitative objectives ... 

The Reactor Safety Study extensively used the lognormal distribution (equation 2.5-6) to represent the variability in failure rates. If plotted on logarithmic graph paper, the lopnormal distribution is normally distributed. 

This method was used in the Reactor Safety Study. 

PREP, used by the Reactor Safety Study, is a preprocessor for KITT that perfo fault... 

AMPI F. d. system tilure data Monte Carlo simulation Mathc niaticaJ Uniform, normal, li.croimal Usoil in the Reactor Safety Study outpul i.s a probability di.slribution for the top > . ent -... 

The frequency of fire-induced core melt, calculated by averaging the observed frequency of the Browns Ferry type of fire over the experience of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants, was found to be lE-5 per reactor-year, or about 20% of the total core-melt probability e.slimated in the Reactor Safety Study. Kazarians and Apostolakis (1978) performed the same type of calculations under different assumptions and concluded that the frequency of core melt could be higher by a factor of 10. 

Table 8.2-1 Reactor Safety Study Accident Release Categories ...

The validity of the risk of nuclear that was estimated by the Reactor Safety Study was questioned when the TMI-2 accident occurred. This showed a misunderstanding of the probabilistic nature of risk, A single event neither proves nor disproves a statistical result it may, however, question the usefulness of risk as a safety measure. 

IPPSS - Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study (PSA). 

RSSMAP - Reactor Safety Study Methodology Applications Program. 

WASH-1400, Reactor Safety Study An Assessment of Accident Risks... 

Kolb, G, J. et al., Review and Evaluation of the Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study, SNL, December 1982. 

APS, l975, Review of the Reactor Safety Study Rev. Mod. Phys. 42 Supp 1. 

Commonwealth Edison Co., 1981, Zion Probabilistic Safety Study, Chicago, IL. 

CRBR, 1977, CRBRP Safety Study, An Assessment of Accident Risk, CRBRP-1. 

Indian Point 2 and 3, 1982, Indian Point Probabilistic Safety Study, Consolidated Edison and NY Power Authority. 

Ringhals, 1983, Ringhals 2 Probabilistic Safety Study, Swedish State Power Board. 

Sizewell-B, 1982, "Sizewell B Probabilistic Safety Study, Westinghouse Electric WCAP-9991. 

Taylor, J. H. et al., 1986, Probabilistic Safety Study Applications Program for In tion of the Indian Point Unit 3 Nuclear Power Plant, NUREG/CR-4565, March. 

There had been small-scale probabilistic risk studies, but the first in-depth study v, as initiated by the U.S, Atomic Energy Commission in September 1972 and completed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This was known as the Reactor Safety Study, W. SH-(400, Ociuher 1975) that set the pattern for subsequent PSAs not only nuclear, but chemical md tniii portation, PSA had it beginnings in nuclear power because of the unknown risk and the large amounts of funds for the investigation. 

I am a physicist who switched to nuclear engineering for my Ph D. My introduction to PSA was as an original participant in the Reactor Safety Study in 1972. Material for this book was first gathered in 1974 for a workshop on what to expect in WASH-1400 (the results of the Reactor Safety Study). Materials were gathered over the years for EPRI, Savannah River Laboratory, and other workshops. A culmination was in 1988 with "Probabilistic Risk Assessment in the Nuclear Power Industry" with Robert Hall as coauthor. This book updates these materials and adds material on PSA in the chemical process industry. I prepared the material for printing using a word processor... 

Hazard identification, step one, means identification of new chemicals or other factors that may cause harmful health effects. Previously, novel hazards were usually observed in case studies or after accidents or other excessive exposures, usually in occupational environments. Today, thorough toxicity studies are required on all pesticides, food additives, and drugs. New chemicals also have to be studied for their potential toxic effects. Thus, earlier hazards were in most cases identified after they had caused harmful effects in humans. Today, most chemical products have been evaluated for their toxicity with experimental animals. Therefore, hazard identification has become a preventive procedure based on safety studies conducted before a chemical compound or product reaches the market, and before individuals are exposed to it. ... 

---