Testing contamination

SnC>2 nanoparticles have been successfully synthesized by chemical co-precipitation method using ethanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran (THF) and ether as solvents. X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Field Emission Electron Microscopy (FESEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) have been used to study the crystallographic and morphological properties of synthesized SnC>2 nanoparticles, while their optical properties have been studied by UV-Visible absorption spectroscopy. UV-Vis absorption spectra shows a weak quantum confinement in all the synthesized SnCL samples. The photo-catalytic activity of as-synthesized SnC>2 nanoparticles under UV irradiation has been evaluated using Methylene Blue (MB) dye as a test contaminant in water. The results showed that solvents played a key role to control the morphology and photo-catalytic activity of SnCE nanoparticles. 

If media fill contaminant is the same as sterility test contaminant ... 

If media fill environmental contaminant is the same as sterility test contaminant and if routine environmental contaminant is the same as sterility test contaminant ... 

If media-fill contaminant is same as sterility test contaminant increase media-fill vial quantities and routine filling environmental monitoring to identify the source of contamination. Review environmental data obtained during line set up. 

If sterility test contaminant is same as media fill environmental contaminant increase routine environmental monitoring (in the same location) and number of media-fill vials to conform. 

If sterility test contaminant is same as routine environmental contaminant the sterility test is voided. Investigate sterility test procedures and room sanitation/sterilization methods to eliminate cause. If media-fill environmental contaminant is same as routine environmental contaminant increase the number of media-fill vials in media hll to determine the product risk potential. Review monitoring technique for possible problem. Review personnel practices, gowning, sanitation, and sterilization. 

Evaluation of the generation system was done with acetone and ethylene oxide as the test contaminants. 

The results obtained with acetone as the test contaminant are shown in Tables II and III. Since acetone is less hazardous to health than ethylene oxide, the high concentrations shown on the tables were chosen to evaluate the performance of the system at these levels. Recoveries were close to 100% in both dry and humid air. 

Even when water comphes with quality parameters as a raw material, it can present some impurities after being turned into a pharmaceutical product. Table 6 presents the level of some contaminants found in water for injection (WFI). Since the raw material should have passed in the quality test, contaminants either were below the allowed concentration level or were introduced after packaging. Contaminants introduced after packaging most Ukely originate from the packaging materials. Section 6.1.3.2 discusses containers as sources of contamination. 

For each series of experiments, the same stainless steel coupon (4 cm X 3.5 cm X 0.1 cm) was precleaned, coated with the test contaminant, and then placed in the autoclave for testing. For precleaning, the coupon was either washed first in a chloroform bath, rinsed with acetone, and then dipped in an acetone bath or immersed in a 1,1,1-trichloroethane bath and wiped with a tissue to remove any residue. After precleaning, the coupon was weighed to determine when the mass of the coupon was within 0.1 mg of its original weight. This was set as the standard for perfect cleanness of the coupon. 

For the first two series of experiments, the coupon was submerged completely in one of the two test contaminants, patted lightly with a lint-free tissue to remove excess material, and weighed. Loading was controlled to 0.005 g from run to run to minimize effects of surface concentration differences. In later series, dopants were applied to one side of the coupon which was marked to designate an area so that the contaminated area would remain constant from run to run. The contaminants were applied to this area with a small, short-bristled paint brush. Contaminant mass for each of these series was kept constant from run to run to within 0.0001 g. 

Test methodology should be sensitive enough to confirm a low process simulation test contamination rate, and the selected limit must be routinely achievable. 

Process simulation test contamination rates approaching zero should be achievable using automated production lines in well-designed aseptic processing facilities, blow-fill- seal and form-fill-seal and in isolator-based systems. 

Processes conducted in older facilities or employing considerable product handling or manual operation may not be capable of achieving near-zero contamination rates. Nevertheless, such processes must be capable of a process simulation test contamination rate not exceeding one in 1000 when 3000 units are filled. 

Calculating effect levels for polluted soils rather than for chemical concentrations is another option and would generate results such as the LC50 for earthworms in the tested contaminated soil/reference soil mixture amounts to 30% of the contaminated soil and 70% reference soil. However, this approach also requires dilution with a reference soil and it may be questioned for its practical relevance. Effect levels may be useful for the evaluation of mobile media such as effluents that are subject to dilution in the environment. However,... 

Records should be kept of the results of all sterility tests and control tests. Contamination rates for different products and for different sterility test techniques should be calculated periodically and compared and their significance assessed (see also Appendix C). 

Toxicity (40 CFR 261.24)—A toxic waste is a waste that contains concentrations of certain listed contaminants above established thresholds when tested using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure, a leaching test. Contaminants include both organic (e.g., pesticides, chlorinated organics) and inorganic contaminants (e.g., heavy metals, including As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Hg, Pb, Se and Ag). 

Soil Test Contaminant Initial Concentration (mg/kg) Final Concentration (mg/kg) Extractable Contaminant of Initial Spike (%)... 

Clinical neonatal screening, hemoglobin analysis Environmental drug testing, water quality testing, contamination level measurements in food Geological evaluation of oil compositions Forensic explosive detection... 

The durability of fuel cells needs to be increased by about five times the current rates (e.g., at least 60,000 h for the stationary distributed generation sector) in order for fuel cells to present a long-term reliable alternative to the current power generation technologies available in the maiket. The degradation mechanisms and failure modes within the fuel cell components and the mitigation measures that could be taken to prevent failure need to be examined and tested. Contamination mechanisms in fuel cells due to air pollutants and fuel impurities need to be carefully addressed to resolve the fuel cell durability issue. 

---