Risks workplace

RISK Workplace Practices Source Release Assessment Exposure Assessment Risk... 

Risk Workplace practices source release assessment... 

Technical Labour In ectorates m opportunity to register thousands of SMEs in the Inspectorates computerised mnhives and categorise them according to whether they were High (A), Medium (B), Low (C) risk workplaces under P.D.294/88. 

A positive, proactive safety culture recognizes the fact that accidents and other downgrading events are caused by a sequence of events that can be interrupted and the accident prevented. Risk assessment will help predict potential loss events. This requires a culture wherein high-risk workplace conditions are not tolerated and high-risk behaviors are not condoned or accepted. This, after all, should be the object of a positive safety culture—safe working conditions and safe work behaviors. 

Occupational health is concerned with physical and psychological hazards as well as chemical and biological hazards. The physical occupational hazards have been well-known for many years and the recent emphasis has been on the development of lower risk workplace environments. Physical hazards include topics such as electricity and manual handling which were covered in earlier chapters and noise, display screen equipment and radiation which are discussed in this chapter. 

Health and safety regulation is not a burden on business it is a basic protection for workers. Cutting back on regulation and inspections will lead to more injuries and deaths as result of poor safety at work [... ] Some of the low risk workplaces identified by the government, such as shops, actually experience high levels of workplace injuries. This will only get worse if employers find it easier to ignore safety risks. 

CDC. 2004. Work-related roadway crashes Who s at risk Workplace safety and health fact sheet, DHHS (NIOSH) publication No. 2004-137. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Washington, D.C. 

Although most nickel sensitization results from nonoccupational exposures, nickel dermatitis was historically a problem in workplaces where there was a high risk of continuous contact with soluble nickel, eg, in electroplating (qv) shops. Improved personal and industrial hygiene has largely eliminated this problem. However, there are a few occupations involving wet nickel work, particularly where detergents faciUtate the penetration of skin by nickel, where hand eczema may occur (126). 

European Commission for these and other substances by nominated dates. The toxicological data and estimation of exposure will form the basis of risk analysis and deterrnination of the appropriate restriction and control of substances in the workplace (58). Restriction of the sales of dangerous substances and preparations to the general pubHc is enforced under Directive 76/769 EC (59). 

In accordance with demonstrated differences between the various asbestos fiber types, the workplace regulation in many countries specifies different exposure limits for chrysotile and the amphiboles (45). Moreover, to alleviate estabHshed, or apprehended, risk from substitute fibers, the regulation often specifies maximum exposure limits for synthetic fibers (46) values of exposure limits adopted in leading industrial countries are coUected in Table 8. 

Apply to all workplaces, unless specifically excepted, and require a fire risk assessment where necessary, appropriate fire-fighting equipment with detectors and alarms measures for fire-fighting emergency routes and exits maintenance of equipment provided. 

Many very hazardous solvents, such as benzene and carbon tetrachloride, were widely used until the 1970s. The situation was very similar for the use of pesticides. Among the toxic pesticides that were still in wide use 20 years ago were chlorophenols, DDT, lindane, and arsenic salts, all of which are classified as human carcinogens as well as being acutely toxic. Fortunately, use of these kinds of very toxic chemicals is now limited in the industrialized world. However, because the number of chemicals used in various industries continues to increase, the risks of long-term health hazards due to long-term exposure to low concentrations of chemicals continues to be a problem in the workplace. 

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons have been classified as human carcinogens because they induce cancers in experimental animals and because smoking and exposure to mixtures of chemicals containing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the workplace increase the risk of lung cancer in exposed individuals. In experimental animals, benzo(a)pyrene induces cancer in different organs depending on the route of administration.Furthermore, exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons commonly occurs in occupations related to traffic (use of diesel engines in transportation and railways). 

Sieiniatycki, j. (Fcl.) (1991). Risk Factors for Cancer in the Workplace, CRC Press, Boca Raroii, FI,. 

This implies, for example, that measurements taken over a given period of time may give insufficient data to integrate workplace factors in the series of activities in the period under consideration in such a way as to permit assessment of the likely maximum risk to which the individual workers are exposed. 

The first step is to identify the substances present at the workplace. As a starting point, knowledge of the process is needed in order to formulate a list of all chemical agents used in the establishment. The list should include not only primary products but also intermediate and final products, as well as reaction products and by-products. For the chemical agents in the list, it is necessary to know their chemical properties, especially hazardous ones their OEL values, including biological limit values and, where these are not available, other technical criteria that can be used to evaluate the risk. It is also helpful to include any information on the safety and health risks of those substances provided by the supplier or other readily available sources. This information on dangerous substances and preparations, in the form of safety data sheets, is intended primarily for industrial users, to enable them to take the measures necessary to ensure the safety and health of workers. 

The identification of chemical agents and the data on workplace factors leads to the assessment of exposure, which can be done in three different stages that depend on the risk level for the worker and the type and amount ot data required ... 

The initial appraisal allows consideration of the likelihood of exposure due to the presence of chemical agents. When the conclusions of the initial appraisal show a possible risk exposure for the worker, more data are gathered taking special account of tasks with high exposures. If necessary, workplace measurements are taken if the input data are not sufficient to enable valid comparison with the limit values. 

The final element in management s communication of a desire to reduce human error is the identification and elimination of error-likely situations. Every task is an opportunity for a human error, but some situahons represent greater risks than others. Identifying these high-risk situations is not easy and an expertise in applying human factors principles to the workplace is an essential prerequisite for this identification. Eliminating these hazardous situations is often relatively simple once they have been identified. In some cases it may be appropriate to provide error-tolerant systems, which are those that facilitate identification of and recovery from the errors. 

The term risk assessment is not only used to describe the likelihood of an ad crse response to a chemical or physical agent, but it has also been used to describe the likelihood of any unwanted event. This subject is treated in more detail in tlie next Part. These include risks such as explosions or injuries in tlie workplace natural catastrophes injury or deatli due to various voluntary activities such as skiing, sky diving, flying, and bimgee Jumping diseases deatli due to natural causes and many others. ... 

Biological exposure indices (BEI) published by the ACGIH are given in Table 4.35. BEIs represent the levels of determinant which are most likely to be observed in specimens collected from a healthy worker who has been exposed to chemicals to the same extent as a worker with inhalation exposure to the TLV. Due to biological variability it is possible for an individual s measurements to exceed the BEI without incurring increased health risk. If, however, levels in specimens obtained from a worker on different occasions persistently exceed the BEI, or if the majority of levels in specimens obtained from a group of workers at the same workplace exceed the BEI, the cause of the excessive values must be investigated and proper action taken to reduce the exposure. 

These are Just some examples of key areas this is not an exhaustive list. Look around your workplace to identify other risk areas. If any risks apply to your work activities, you will need to do risk assessments to check that you have removed or reduced the risk. 

---