Workplace risk assessment

Apply to all workplaces, unless specifically excepted, and require a fire risk assessment where necessary, appropriate fire-fighting equipment with detectors and alarms measures for fire-fighting emergency routes and exits maintenance of equipment provided. 

The term risk assessment is not only used to describe the likelihood of an ad crse response to a chemical or physical agent, but it has also been used to describe the likelihood of any unwanted event. This subject is treated in more detail in tlie next Part. These include risks such as explosions or injuries in tlie workplace natural catastrophes injury or deatli due to various voluntary activities such as skiing, sky diving, flying, and bimgee Jumping diseases deatli due to natural causes and many others. ... 

These are Just some examples of key areas this is not an exhaustive list. Look around your workplace to identify other risk areas. If any risks apply to your work activities, you will need to do risk assessments to check that you have removed or reduced the risk. 

The Perbellini PBPK model for -hexane is the only validated model for this chemical identified in the literature. The Fisher model was intended for risk assessment to predict which of 19 volatile organic chemicals may be present in milk at a high enough level after workplace exposure to raise health concerns for a nursing infant. 

The EU Technical Guidance Document (TGD) for risk assessment of new and existing substances and biocides (EC 2003) contains guidance on exposure assessment (Chapter 2). The core principles of human exposure assessments according to the TGD are humans may be exposed to substances in the workplace (occupational exposure), from use of consumer products (consumer exposure),... 

When epidemiological studies form the basis for the risk assessment of a single chemical or even complex mixtures, such as various combustion emissions, it may be stated that in those cases the effects of combined action of chemicals have been incorporated. Examples can, for instance, be found in the updated WHO Air Quality guidelines (WHO 2000). Thus, the guideline value for, e.g., ozone was derived from epidemiological studies of persons exposed to ozone as part of the total mixture of chemicals in polluted ambient air. In addition, the risk estimate for exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was derived from studies on coke-oven workers heavily exposed to benzo[fl]pyrene as a component of a mixture of PAH and possibly many other chemicals at the workplace. Therefore, in some instances the derivation of a tolerable intake for a single compound can be based on studies where the compound was part of a complex chemical mixture. 

Studies of working women present the potential for additional bias, because some factors that influence employment status may also affect reproductive end-points. For example, because of child care responsibilities, women may terminate employment, as might women with a history of reproductive problems who wish to have children and are concerned about workplace exposures (Joffe, 1983 Lemasters Pinney, 1989). Thus, retrospective studies of female exposure that do not include terminated female workers may be of limited use in risk assessment, because the level of risk for some of the outcomes is likely to be overestimated (Lemasters Pinney, 1989). 

The approaches described previously can be used to relate biomonitoring results to a reference population or to workplace exposures, but they do not evaluate the risk associated with the amount of a chemical found in the body. To do that, one needs to develop a relationship between biomarker concentration and toxic response, a relationship that is not commonly derived in standard toxicologic practice. The following sections outline methods for deriving such a relationship. The approaches include the ideal case of existing risk assessments based on biomarker-response relationships established in epidemiologic research. Lead and mercury are used as examples of cases in which exposure was quantified according to hair or blood biomarkers and dose-response associations were developed on this basis. 

Monitoring employee health is one part of the exposure assessment in the risk assessment paradigm. The second part is workplace monitoring, the subject of Chapter 2 of this report. 

If one conducts a literature search on the term risk assessment, a lengthy list of publications on a range of topics will be produced (NAS/NRC, 1983 1994 Paustenbach, 1995), because this term has been used to describe estimates of the likelihood of a number of unwanted events. These include, for example, industrial explosions, workplace injuries, failures of machine parts, natural catastrophes, injury or death as a result of voluntary activities or lifestyle, diseases, and death from natural causes. 

Although use of isolators or other effective engineering controls is the preferred method of handling highly potent compounds in solid form, this is not the only possible approach. We have found that use of traditional laboratory controls and a combination of high level of PPE in conjunction with rigorous administrative controls can provide adequate protection. Before considering the use of any of these solutions in a workplace, make sure workers are fully informed about hazard identification, risk assessment and control options. 

This section gives a nonexhaustive overview of the regulatory state of the art on human risk assessment of chemical mixtures in the United States, the European Union (EU), and other nations and (international agencies. The focus is on regulations for environmental pollution, but when available and relevant, mixture regulations from other policy areas have also been included in the overview, for example, for food quality and the workplace. The reader is referred to McCarty and Borgert (2006) and Monosson (2005) for a more extensive overview of mixture toxicity regulations related to human health. 

Before completion of an EU risk assessment on TCE, Sweden decided that epidemiological evidence on the hazardous properties of the chemical was sufficient to warrant strict regulatory control in the workplace (through the application of Article 138 of the EC Treaty). Sweden therefore began to implement a company use-specific authorisation system. Sweden s action was later challenged by the European Commission as causing unnecessary barriers to trade, but a European Court of Justice ruling upheld the Swedish system. 

Exposure assessments may be conducted for one of four purposes hazard evaluation leading to appropriate control efforts, monitoring to ensure compliance with workplace standards, dose-response characterization within the context of epidemiological studies, and estimation of dose or uptake for risk assessments. Assessment strategies and measurement techniques will differ depending on the purpose at hand. 

Each hazard classification and communication system (workplace, consumer, transport) begins coverage with an assessment of the hazards posed by the chemical or chemical product involved. The degree of its capacity to harm depends on its intrinsic properties, i.e. its capacity to interfere with normal biological processes, and its capacity to bum, explode, corrode, etc. This is based primarily on a review of the scientific studies available. The concept of risk or the likelihood of harm occurring, and subsequently communication of that information, is introduced when exposure is considered in conjunction with the data regarding potential hazards. The basic approach to risk assessment is characterized by the simple formula ... 

Local skin effects are not the only consideration for dermal toxicity. The role of the skin as a barrier preventing the free penetration of exogenous chemicals into the systemic circulation is equally important. Indeed, it is becoming apparent that the dermal route of exposure is in many cases comparable to inhalation and oral absorption as a potential source of potentially toxic chemicals in the body and forms an integral part of many multi-media multi-pathway risk assessments. In this context, for example, the (US) National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health is currently revising its current skin notations (which identify chemicals likely to present dermal hazards in the workplace) to take into account a... 

---