Risk assessment dietary

The development of CHD is a lifelong process. Except in rare cases of severely elevated serum cholesterol levels, years of poor dietary habits, sedentary lifestyle, and life-habit risk factors (e.g., smoking and obesity) contribute to the development of atherosclerosis.3 Unfortunately, many individuals at risk for CHD do not receive lipid-lowering therapy or are not optimally treated. This chapter will help identify individuals at risk, assess treatment goals based on the level of CHD risk, and implement optimal treatment strategies and monitoring plans. 

Based on the data from controlled human studies, the NOEL for plasma cholinesterase inhibition for a single dose of chlorpyrifos is between 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and the more conservative 0.1 mg/kg bw/day (100 pg/kg bw/day) is used in this assessment as the acute NOEL for chlorpyrifos. The repeated dose NOEL in humans is 0.03 mg/kg bw/day (30 pg/kg bw/day), based on plasma cholinesterase activity, and this is the basis for the establishment of the reference dose of 0.003 mg/kg bw/day (3 pg/kg bw/day) used by the EPA in assessing dietary risk to chlorpyrifos. For the work described here, both NOELs are used as bases for assessing risks to persons who have the potential for non-dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos. For exposures that are infrequent or of short duration, the 100 pg/kg bw/day NOEL is assumed to be the more appropriate value, and the lower 30 pg/kg bw/day will be used in those situations in which exposure may be considered to be more frequent. ... 

Researchers focused on the metabolically competent human hepatoma cell line HepG2 as a model of human liver. HepG2 cells are a well-known hepatoma cell line that retains many of the morphological characteristics of liver parenchymal cells. This model is often used as a useful tool for HRA/ERA-oriented chemical risk assessment due to the expression of antioxidant and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (in particular phase I and phase II enzymes responsible for the bioactivation/detoxification of various xenobiotics) that can be induced or inhibited by dietary and non-dietary agents [28-30]. 

The US Congress funded the Pesticide Data Program (PDP) in order to improve the accuracy of pesticide dietary risk assessments carried out by the US EPA. The USDA s Agricultural Marketing Service carries out the program. As recommended in the 1993 NAS/NRC report, the PDP focuses on the foods consumed most heavily by children and food is tested, to the extent possible, as eaten (Agricultural Market Service, 2004 National Research Council, 1987). For example, banana and orange samples are tested without the peel processed foods are tested as they come out of a can, jar or freezer bag. 

In Tables 14.9 and 14.10, the last column reports the environmental impact points (EIPs) for typical applications of organic and conventional pesticides derived from the Pesticide Environmental Assessment System, or PEAS. This model produces relative rankings of risks based on defined use rates and use patterns (the formulation used to apply a pesticide, timing, target of the application, spray equipment used, etc). PEAS scores reflect an equal balancing of acute pesticide risks to farm workers, chronic risks via dietary exposure and exposures to birds, Daphnia and bees. 

Marti-Cid R, Huertas D, Nadal M et al (2010) Dietary exposure to organochlorine compounds in Tarragona Province (Catalonia, Spain) health risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16 588-602... 

Schoof, R.A., L.J. Yost, E. Crecelius, K. Irgolic, W. Goessler, H.R. Guo, and H. Greene. 1998. Dietary arsenic intake in Taiwanese districts with elevated arsenic in drinking water. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 4 117-135. 

The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996 mandated that the US EPA carry out risk assessments that consider the cumulative effects of exposure to pesticides having a common mechanism of toxicity, as well as consider exposure to each pesticide by various routes of exposure (e.g., dermal, dietary, inhalation) and sources (e.g., residues in food and water) in an aggregate manner [19]. To accomplish this, there needs to be sufficient evidence supporting a common adverse effect that is associated with a common mechanism of action in specific target tissues. To date, the required criteria necessary to establish a common mechanism of toxicity with a specific toxic effect for the pyrethroids are not available [1,8,98]. 

Winter CK. 1992. Dietary pesticide risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 127 23-67... 

The first edition1 of this book was published approximately 13 years ago. Its primary objective was to present an overview and a "roadmap" of the process of new drug discovery and development, particularly oriented to individuals or companies entering the pharmaceutical field. It was written by one of the authors (Smith), with no contributors, and drawn on Smith s experiences in the industry and field over the course of nearly 40 years. In the second edition, the scope of the first book has been expanded and technical details in the form of hard data have been included. In addition to the editors own commentary and contributions, the major part of the book is the result of contributions of experts in the industry. New chapters on risk assessment, international harmonization of drug development and regulation, dietary supplements, patent law, and entrepreneurial startup of a new pharmaceutical company have been added. Some of the important, basic operational aspects of drug discovery and development (e.g., organizational matters, staff requirements, pilot plant operations, etc.) are not repeated in this book but can be found in the first edition. 

Keywords Dietary intake, Food analysis, Liquid chromatography, Mass spectrometry, Perfluorinated compounds, Perfluorinated compounds, Risk assessment... 

The characterisation of health hazards of food contaminants, the assessment of the occurrence of undesirable compounds in food and the estimation of the dietary intake are key issues in the risk assessment. In 2000, the European Commission published a White Paper on Food Safety, which underlined the importance of ensuring the highest possible standards of food safety and proposed a new approach to achieve them. Recently, PFCs have gained increased scientific and socioeconomic interest as emerging environmental contaminants due to the unique combination of persistence, toxicity and environmental prevalence. Risk assessment of the dietary exposure to PFCs, however, is hampered by the lack of sufficient data about the occurrence of these contaminants in food. 

It was recommended that the first step is to use a conservative, theoretical/hypothetical approach (such as the budget method) if no problems are encountered, then there is no need for further estimation. The next step would be a refinement of the intake estimate by undertaking a 3-day dietary study supplemented with a food frequency questionnaire to estimate percentage of consumers a minimum study population size would be 200 persons. If the intake estimate is stiU above the ADI, it would be necessary to carry out a risk assessment. 

When the project was started in 2002, European exposure factor data were scattered within numerous national and international institutions. ExpoFacts has created no new data, but instead compiled the existing data into one Internet database, where it can be easily found, screened, and downloaded from. Data were collected from the EU countries, candidate countries to EU, and EFTA countries. As a result, the ExpoFacts database contains data from 30 European countries. In addition to the population time use patterns and exposure route information, e.g., dietary statistics, the database contains socio-demographic and physiologic information to enable database use as a tool for population-wide exposure modeling and risk assessment. 

Clearly, care must be exercised to ensure that dietary manipulation and supplementation do not produce oral loads able to swamp the body s defenses. For the reasons outlined above, a decision tree has been developed to assist in the risk assessment of botanical products. ... 

The 1996 Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) now requires that an additional safety factor of 10 be used in the risk assessment of pesticides to ensure the safety of infants and children, unless the EPA can show that an adequate margin of safety is assured with out it (Scheuplein, 2000). The rational behind this additional safety factor is that infants and children have different dietary consumption patterns than adults and infants, and children are more susceptible to toxicants than adults. We do know from pharmacokinetics studies with various human pharmaceuticals that drug elimination is slower in infants up to 6 months of age than in adults, and therefore the potential exists for greater tissue concentrations and vulnerability for neonatal and postnatal effects. Based on these observations, the US EPA supports a default safety factor greater or less than 10, which may be used on the basis of reliable data. However, there are few scientific data from humans or animals that permit comparisons of sensitivities of children and adults, but there are some examples, such as lead, where children are the more sensitive population. It some cases qualitative differences in age-related susceptibility are small beyond 6 months of age, and quantitative differences in toxicity between children and adults can sometimes be less than a factor of 2 or 3. 

In contrast to lignans, few studies have been reported regarding the relationship between ALA and breast cancer. In a meta-analysis, Saadatian-Elahi et al. (2004) reported a significant protective effect of total n-3 fatty acids and breast cancer risk. In this assessment, three cohort and seven case-control studies were reviewed. The case-control studies revealed an inverse association between ALA and breast cancer risk. High dietary intakes of ALA were correlated with a reduced breast cancer risk (Franceschi et al., 1996). This study involved 2569 women with breast cancer and the result was supported by a cohort study conducted in the Netherlands (Voorrips et al., 2002). A significant inverse association was found between ALA content in breast adipose tissue and breast cancer risk (Klein et al., 2000 Maillard et al., 2002). Furthermore, ALA to LA ratio close to one was also significantly associated with lower breast cancer risk (Maillard et al., 2002). 

Aggregate exposure assessment is naturally more complex than the methods used for dietary risk assessment. In the simplest analysis a worst case can be established for each source and exposure route and then summed to give a total exposure. If this were below any threshold of concern such as the PTWI then no further action would be required. However, if the total worst case exposure was above a PTWI then it is unlikely to reflect the real situation since the probability that any individual would be exposed to each source by each route at the maximum level is very remote. 

Although confusing, it is also correct to note that potential human health risks are considered before a tolerance is established. The EPA will perform a risk assessment of the potential dietary risk to consumers from exposure to the pesticide from all registered (and proposed) uses of the pesticide. If such a risk is determined to be excessive, the EPA will deny the manufacturer s petition to establish a tolerance. If the level of risk is not considered to be of concern, the... 

The ability to use probabilistic approaches to assess dietary pesticide exposure has also changed much of the emphasis of pesticide risk assessment practices from assessing long-term (chronic) exposure to short-term (acute) exposure. Deterministic approaches worked well with chronic assessments since the day-to-day variability in food consumption patterns and the variability of pesticide residue levels tended to average out over the course of a 70-year exposure period. Deterministic approaches have also often been used in the assessment of acute dietary risk by assuming an upper percentile level of food consumption and the maximum detected or allowable level of residue. The point estimate determined in this manner is then compared with the RfD to determine the acceptability of exposure under the specified conditions. 

---