Probabilistic approach

The derivations based on probability theory utilize the formula that expresses the probability of a number of 

When both m and Es tend to infinity ( m and Es oo), while maintaining the constant finite ratio D, the binomial distribution transforms into the Poisson probability distribution  

One notes that the probability that any number of nucleation events occur inside the considered region equals 

Exclusion and inclusion of a point in the transformed fraction are mutually exclusive. Therefore, the probability that an arbitrarily chosen point, denoted here as A, at a given time t will remain outside the growing domains, Po(f), enables a conversion degree to expressed as 

The known approaches focus on the calculation of P if), that is, on finding the expected value E. 

---

E. B. Haugen, Probabilistic Approaches to Design, John Wiley Sons, Inc., New York, 1968. 

An important aspect of the simple probabilistic approach used above was that it provided a transparent means of explaining to the company the reasons behind the design decisions. It gave a degree of clarity not provided by a deterministic approach and ultimately gave the engineers more confidence in their designs. 

Virtually all design parameters such as tolerances, material properties and service loads exhibit some statistical variability and uncertainty that influence the adequacy of the design. A key requirement in the probabilistic approach is detailed knowledge... 

The measure used to describe the potential for noncarcinogenic toxicity to occur in an individual is not expressed as tlie probability of an individual suffering an adverse effect. The EPA does not at tlie present time use a probabilistic approach to estimate tlie potential for noncarcinogenic healtli effects. Instead, tlie potential for non carcinogenic effects is evaluated by comparing an exposure level over a specified time period (e.g., lifetime) witli a reference dose derived for a similar exposure period. Tliis ratio of exposure to toxicity is called a liazard quotient and is described below. (The reader is referred to Chapter 11 for additional details on tlie material tliat follows). The noncancer liazard quotient assumes tliat tliere is a level of exposure (i.e., RfD) below which it is unlikely for even sensitive populations to experience adverse healtli effects. 

Shurdut, B., Assessment of Exposures and Risks to Greenhouse Workers Applying a Chlorpyrifos-Based Insecticide to Ornamentals Using Conventional and Probabilistic Approaches, paper presented at the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1994. 

Criminalistics and trace evidence are both terms that apply to all types of physical material that may be circumstantial evidence in the trial of a case. Most often experts who are identified as criminalists, microanalysts, or trace evidence examiners analyze a variety of types of trace evidence. They carry out three types of identification. First is to determine the nature of small items of trace evidence. After this forensic experts compare the trace evidence with known materials for the purpose of determining the origin of the evidence. The third type of criminahstics investigations is performed in order to identify an individual to whom the trace belongs. For this purpose population studies using statistics (especially the probabilistic approach of Bayesian theory) and chemometrics methods are utilized. 

US stock exchanges based on the probabilistic approach, requiring the report of only proved reserves they, nonetheless, also allow scope for some discretion. In conclusion, it can be said that, so far, there are no international requirements or standards in place regarding reserve classification and reporting, and the methodologies used for reserve estimates seem to vary according to their purpose as a result, reserve data are often referred to as political data . The consequences are inconsistency and controversy about the future supply of oil and gas. 

The level of radioactive contamination in the forest can be much higher than in open country (up to 10 times greater), but the density of radionuelide at forest ground level is very variable, because of the tree stands. Cs ground deposition in the zone affected by the Chernobyl aeeident ean vary up to 50 fold. This variability makes it difficult to predict the speeifie aetivity of radionuclides in particular components of the forest ecosystem, and forces a probabilistic approach. 

Probabilistic approaches take advantage of current computational capabilities to combine all of the data in a pesticide residue distribution (rather than a single expected value) with food consumption data to develop a distribution of daily exposure. This approach is called a Monte Carlo simulation, although there are many ways to conduct this type of analysis. 

To account for the effect of a sufficiently broad, statistical distribution of heterogeneities on the overall transport, we can consider a probabilistic approach that will generate a probability density function in space (5) and time (t), /(i, t), describing key features of the transport. The effects of multiscale heterogeneities on contaminant transport patterns are significant, and consideration only of the mean transport behavior, such as the spatial moments of the concentration distribution, is not sufficient. The continuous time random walk (CTRW) approach is a physically based method that has been advanced recently as an effective means to quantify contaminant transport. The interested reader is referred to a detailed review of this approach (Berkowitz et al. 2006). 

Slob, W. and M.N. Pieters. 1998. A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake Emits and human risks from toxicological studies General framework. Risk Anal. 18 787-798. 

The probabilistic approach allows for a closer link with specific knowledge or lack of knowledge in specific assessments. For example, one may be more confident in the magnimde of the possible interspecies difference in one case than another. This may be expressed in the width of the relevant distribution for the assessment factor. However, in many cases, even the range of uncertainty is uncertain, and for those situations default distributions are called for. 

Baird et al. (1996) suggested a probabilistic alternative to the practice used by the US-EPA to derive RfDs from a NOAEL and application of UFs. The probabilistic approach expresses the human population threshold for a given substance as a probability distribution of values, rather than a single RfD value, taking into account the major sources of scientific uncertainty in such estimates. The approach was illustrated by using much of the same data that US-EPA used to justify their RfD procedure. For the four key extrapolations that were considered necessary to define the human population threshold based on animal data (interspecies, interindividual, LOAEL-to-NOAEL, and subchronic-to-chronic), the proposed approach used available data to define a probability distribution of each adjustment factor, rather than using available data to define point estimates of UFs. 

Slob and Pieters (1998) have proposed a probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies in which it is acknowledged that both the effect parameter (e.g., NOAEL, BMD) and the assessment factors are uncertain and can best be described by lognormal distributions. 

Other, more sophisticated approaches for addressing uncertainties in the risk assessment process may be adopted in future risk assessments. For example, the use of probabilistic approaches in risk assessment will probably have an impact in fumre risk assessments. For more information on probabilistic approaches in risk assessment, the reader is kindly referred to the short overviews presented in Sections 4.14 and 5.11 as well as scientific papers, for example Baird et al. (1996), Slob and Pieters (1998), Edler et al. (2002), Renwick et al. (2004), and van der Voet and Slob (2007). 

Giddings JM, Anderson TA, Hall LW, Kendall RJ, Richards RP, Solomon KR, Williams WM. 2000. Aquatic ecological risk assessment of atrazine a tiered, probabilistic approach. Novartis 709-00. Greensboro (NC) Novartis Crop Protection. 

Essential prereqnisites for a probabilistic risk assessment are a well thought-out problem formulation and a clear definition of the assessment endpoints. The probabilistic approach according to its very natnre aims at making predictions on quantities or the occurrence of certain events. Snch qnantities and events must be specified precisely such that, at least in principle, there is no doubt on what the quantity is or whether the event happened (Morgan and Henrion 1990). 

---