Dietary Risk Exposure Assessments

Some animal studies indicate that dietary exposure to methyl parathion causes decreased humoral and cellular responses (Shtenberg and Dzhunusova 1968 Street and Sharma 1975). A more recent, well-designed animal study that included a battery of immuno/lymphoreticular end points showed few effects at the nonneurotoxic doses tested (Crittenden et al. 1998). No adequate studies are available in humans to assess the immunotoxic potential of methyl parathion. Therefore, studies measuring specific immunologic parameters in occupationally exposed populations are needed to provide useful information. Further studies are also needed to investigate the mechanism for methyl parathion-induced immunotoxicity since this information would help to identify special populations at risk for such effects. 

One common objective of an LSMBS is to refine the estimates of actual exposure of consumers to ingredients or impurities in one or more products. For example, study results might be intended to determine a realistic human dietary exposure to pesticide residues in fresh fruits and vegetables. The advent of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) has produced an enhanced focus on the exposure of children to pesticides. A well-designed and implemented LSMBS would afford the opportunity to delineate better the exposure and risk to children and other population subgroups. The LSMBS would provide consumer-level data at or near the point of consumption, allowing the refined, relevant, and realistic assessments of dietary exposure. 

OPMBS data were intended to support a valid estimate of the dietary exposure of populations and sub-populations to organophosphate residues in fresh fmits and vegetables. The results of the study were presented to the EPA in a report, with appropriate summaries. All of the study results, i.e., residue levels of each compound determined in each sample of each commodity, were also provided to the EPA in a database. EPA has recently notified the task force that the OPMBS study on the frequency and magnitude of organophosphate residues in fruits and vegetables is acceptable. The EPA is expected to utilize the data in a new assessment of potential dietary risk from organophosphate residues. 

Based on the data from controlled human studies, the NOEL for plasma cholinesterase inhibition for a single dose of chlorpyrifos is between 0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and the more conservative 0.1 mg/kg bw/day (100 pg/kg bw/day) is used in this assessment as the acute NOEL for chlorpyrifos. The repeated dose NOEL in humans is 0.03 mg/kg bw/day (30 pg/kg bw/day), based on plasma cholinesterase activity, and this is the basis for the establishment of the reference dose of 0.003 mg/kg bw/day (3 pg/kg bw/day) used by the EPA in assessing dietary risk to chlorpyrifos. For the work described here, both NOELs are used as bases for assessing risks to persons who have the potential for non-dietary exposure to chlorpyrifos. For exposures that are infrequent or of short duration, the 100 pg/kg bw/day NOEL is assumed to be the more appropriate value, and the lower 30 pg/kg bw/day will be used in those situations in which exposure may be considered to be more frequent. ... 

In Tables 14.9 and 14.10, the last column reports the environmental impact points (EIPs) for typical applications of organic and conventional pesticides derived from the Pesticide Environmental Assessment System, or PEAS. This model produces relative rankings of risks based on defined use rates and use patterns (the formulation used to apply a pesticide, timing, target of the application, spray equipment used, etc). PEAS scores reflect an equal balancing of acute pesticide risks to farm workers, chronic risks via dietary exposure and exposures to birds, Daphnia and bees. 

Marti-Cid R, Huertas D, Nadal M et al (2010) Dietary exposure to organochlorine compounds in Tarragona Province (Catalonia, Spain) health risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16 588-602... 

The Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) of 1996 mandated that the US EPA carry out risk assessments that consider the cumulative effects of exposure to pesticides having a common mechanism of toxicity, as well as consider exposure to each pesticide by various routes of exposure (e.g., dermal, dietary, inhalation) and sources (e.g., residues in food and water) in an aggregate manner [19]. To accomplish this, there needs to be sufficient evidence supporting a common adverse effect that is associated with a common mechanism of action in specific target tissues. To date, the required criteria necessary to establish a common mechanism of toxicity with a specific toxic effect for the pyrethroids are not available [1,8,98]. 

The characterisation of health hazards of food contaminants, the assessment of the occurrence of undesirable compounds in food and the estimation of the dietary intake are key issues in the risk assessment. In 2000, the European Commission published a White Paper on Food Safety, which underlined the importance of ensuring the highest possible standards of food safety and proposed a new approach to achieve them. Recently, PFCs have gained increased scientific and socioeconomic interest as emerging environmental contaminants due to the unique combination of persistence, toxicity and environmental prevalence. Risk assessment of the dietary exposure to PFCs, however, is hampered by the lack of sufficient data about the occurrence of these contaminants in food. 

When the project was started in 2002, European exposure factor data were scattered within numerous national and international institutions. ExpoFacts has created no new data, but instead compiled the existing data into one Internet database, where it can be easily found, screened, and downloaded from. Data were collected from the EU countries, candidate countries to EU, and EFTA countries. As a result, the ExpoFacts database contains data from 30 European countries. In addition to the population time use patterns and exposure route information, e.g., dietary statistics, the database contains socio-demographic and physiologic information to enable database use as a tool for population-wide exposure modeling and risk assessment. 

Aggregate exposure assessment is naturally more complex than the methods used for dietary risk assessment. In the simplest analysis a worst case can be established for each source and exposure route and then summed to give a total exposure. If this were below any threshold of concern such as the PTWI then no further action would be required. However, if the total worst case exposure was above a PTWI then it is unlikely to reflect the real situation since the probability that any individual would be exposed to each source by each route at the maximum level is very remote. 

The risk to health from chemicals in food can be assessed by comparing estimates of dietary exposure with recommended safe levels of exposure. For most metals and other elements, these are the Provisional Tolerable Weekly Intakes (PTWIs) and the Provisional Tolerable Daily Intakes (PTDIs) recommended by the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives of the Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation International Programme on Chemical Safety (JECFA). The European Commission s Scientific Committee on Food has established other relevant safe levels. These are Acceptable Daily Intakes (ADIs) for chemicals added to food, and Tolerable Daily Intakes (TDIs) for chemical contaminants. The use of the term tolerable implies permissibility rather than acceptability. All the above recommendations are estimates of the amount of substance that can be ingested over a lifetime without appreciable risk, expressed on a daily or weekly basis as appropriate. 

Although confusing, it is also correct to note that potential human health risks are considered before a tolerance is established. The EPA will perform a risk assessment of the potential dietary risk to consumers from exposure to the pesticide from all registered (and proposed) uses of the pesticide. If such a risk is determined to be excessive, the EPA will deny the manufacturer s petition to establish a tolerance. If the level of risk is not considered to be of concern, the... 

The ability to use probabilistic approaches to assess dietary pesticide exposure has also changed much of the emphasis of pesticide risk assessment practices from assessing long-term (chronic) exposure to short-term (acute) exposure. Deterministic approaches worked well with chronic assessments since the day-to-day variability in food consumption patterns and the variability of pesticide residue levels tended to average out over the course of a 70-year exposure period. Deterministic approaches have also often been used in the assessment of acute dietary risk by assuming an upper percentile level of food consumption and the maximum detected or allowable level of residue. The point estimate determined in this manner is then compared with the RfD to determine the acceptability of exposure under the specified conditions. 

In the eighties and early nineties, the USEPA evaluated dietary risk with an analysis method known as the Dietary Risk Evaluation System (DRES) (USEPA, 1991), which was based on the USDA s 1977 to 1978 National Food Consumption Survey. Consequently, dietary exposure assessments became genetically referred to as DRES analyses. Currently, the USEPA is using the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model (DEEM , Version 7.87) (Exponent, 2000), which allows exposure to be calculated from 1994 to 1996 CSFII along with the 1998 supplemental children s survey information. 

A tiered approach is also used for calculating estimated residues in animal commodities (meat, milk, and eggs), and higher-tier calculations can have a significant impact in decreasing estimates of dietary exposure and risk. The Tier III assessment for atrazine and simazine (Tables 27.3 and 27.4) is based on calculations of the estimated theoretical residue in animal commodities, whereas the Tier I assessments use tolerance values. These theoretical residues are often referred to as secondary residues. Calculations for estimating secondary residues in animal commodities are performed by constructing livestock (beef, dairy, and poultry) diets comprised of treated feed items to obtain a... 

The human health risk assessment was conducted based on exposure estimates from two most relevant exposure pathways, namely dietary intake of POPs from food consumption and inhalation intake of airborne POPs contaminants. The potential intake of POPs from drinking water (considered to be a relatively minor exposure pathway) was not taken into account due to lack of relevant local data necessary for their estimation. 

Results of human health risk assessment indicated that there was no unacceptable inhalation nor dietary chronic/carcinogenic risk of toxicological concern associated with a lifetime exposure of Hong Kong residents to the current level of POPs contamination in the local environment and locally consumed foods. 

Schecter and Li (1997) have calculated weight-adjusted intakes of CDDs derived from consumption of four types of fast foods for 6-year-old children. Additional information on dietary intake of CDDs from other types of foods should be conducted for various age groups of children to help identify the magnitude and sources of dietary exposure during childhood. Studies to verify these calculations would be helpful in assessing health risks to children. 

---