Spray equipment

Sprays are the most common means of insecticide appHcation and generally involve the use of water as the principal carrier, although volatile oils sometimes are used. With the older inorganic insecticides, suspensions in water were used at dilutions of 0.1 ndash 0.2%. The development of the more effective organic insecticides has allowed the widespread use of concentrate sprays in which the toxicant is contained at 10 ndash 98% and the amount of carrier to be appHed is enormously reduced. The use of concentrate or ultralow volume sprays has brought about a revolution in spray equipment away... 

Because high quaHty, low cost, and optimum performance are required for spray equipment, improved analytical and experimental tools are iadispensable for increasing productivity ia many competitive iadustries. In most iastances, it is no longer adequate to characterize a spray solely on the basis of flow rate and spray pattern. Information on droplet size, velocity, volume flux, and number density is often needed and can be determined usiag advanced laser diagnostic techniques. These improvements have benefited a wide spectmm of consumer and specialized iadustrial products. 

Specification for elecirosiaiic hand held spraying equipment for non flammable material for painting and finishing BS EN 50059/1991 ... 

In summary, preliminary studies indicate that plasma spray coatings show great potential for improving the bondability of steel. Potential drawbacks include the requirement for relatively expensive plasma spray equipment and the necessity to keep the substfate temperature below that which would lead to undesirable metallurgical changes. 

Despite the progress outlined in this chapter, much work remains to be done in the metal surface preparation arena. For example, there is still no ideal surface preparation method that does for steel what anodization processes do for aluminum and titanium. The plasma spray process looks encouraging but because it is slow for large areas and requires rather expensive robot controlled plasma spray equipment, its use will probably be limited to some rather special applications. For more general use, the sol-gel process has potential if future studies confirm recently reported results. 

Despite the ability to adapt spray painting techniques to cope with a multitude of shapes and sizes, all surfaces must be accessible for painting (and indeed for preparation). It is worth remembering that high output spray equipment is infinitely more cumbersome than the smaller set-ups used in laboratories. Thus, fins and ribs must be wellspaced with their edges made round and smooth to retain paint more readily. 

Spraying Thermoplastics solutions such as those based on p.v.c./p.v.a. copolymers may be applied by conventional paint spraying equipment. Because they are thermoplastic they do not require heat to crosslink them, but they may require some heat to evaporate off the solvents. 

When the solubility of the thermoplastic is poor at room temperature it may be possible to produce a dispersion in a mixture of diluents and latent solvents. This dispersion may be applied by conventional paint spray equipment. The coated item is placed in an oven where the diluents evaporate off. The latent solvents then dissolve the thermoplastic and evaporate from this solution at a controlled rate, thus producing a continuous him. P.V.F., and p.v.d.f. and p.t.f.c.e. coatings are produced from dispersions of this type. 

Silver Highly conductive (0.1 ohm per square foot or less) applied by conventional spray equipment easy application electrically stable (minimal change in resistance with environmental cycling) easily applied to selected area field repairable. High cost... 

The risk of corrosion is high with cold lay-up, and all efforts should be made to minimize humidity through the use of desiccants and heaters. Additionally, film formers and temporary coatings may be applied using spray equipment. 

Methyl parathion has been released to the environment mainly as a result of its use as an insecticide on crops. It is applied to agricultural crops by aerial or ground spraying equipment. Methyl parathion has been detected in surface waters and sediments, rainwater, aquatic organisms, and food. There are no known natural sources of the compound. Methyl parathion has been identified in at least 16 of the 1,585 hazardous waste sites on the NPL (HazDat 2001). 

The mathematics involved with calculating the amount of active ingredient, formulated product, adjuvants, and water to put in a spray tank to achieve the application rate specified in the protocol should be addressed prior to arrival at the field for the first application. This is also true for the calibration method. The author has found that if eight agronomists are involved in a spray application, one will encounter eight distinct calibration methods. If a calibration SOP is not written for the spray equipment to be used, the precise steps in the calibration process should be documented in the field notebook. 

Accurate and even application of test substance is absolutely critical to study success. If the application is highly variable or deviates significantly from the target application rate, the study results may be technically unusable and/or unacceptable to regulatory authorities. Accurate agrochemical application begins with careful calibration of the spray equipment. Hence Study Directors should be familiar with sprayer calibration techniques, even if they will not be personally making the applications. 

The amounts of surface deposits resulting from commercial and experimental applications of DDT and parathion were ascertained on apples, pears, peaches, oranges, and lemons. Applications were made with conventional high pressure spraying equipment, utilizing manually operated guns or semiautomatic booms, and with two types of air blast sprayers. 

Steel, unless adequately protected with a film of oil subsequent to rolling mill operations, has a tendency to form surface rust rather quickly. This rust on the surface of the metal prevents proper conversion coating. A traditional method of removing rust is an acid applied by power spray equipment. The spraying action cleans both by physical impingement and the etching action of the acid. The power spray action is followed by a brush scrub, which further removes soil loosened by the acid. The brush scrub is followed by a strong alkaline spray wash, which removes all traces of the acid and neutralizes the surface.1-5... 

The test substance Undeen (active ingredient propoxur, 200 g/L) was applied by hand-held, high-volume spraying equipment at an application rate of a minimum 25 g active ingredient (a.i.) per 1000 m2 and a volume rate of approximately 100 L/1000 m2. 

A field operator exposure study was designed to accommodate the chemical properties and the use pattern involved in the treatment of potato crops for protection against the Colorado potato beetle. Fifteen farmworkers experienced in the use of tractor-drawn sprayers for application of crop protection materials to crops were selected. All were adult males. To avoid production of a large quantity of treated potato crop prior to registration of the product for sale, the trials were performed on stubble fields after harvest of winter wheat crops in a potato-growing area of southern Ontario. This allowed the use of typical farm spray equipment and a typical duration of exposure for a complete shift of work. 

The volunteer had to be able to provide typical spray equipment. 

Moreover, the LAI in nearly all crops is in reality above 2, primarily in the range of 3 to 5, especially in high growing crops. Correspondingly, the foliar residue will be lower by a factor of 3 to 5 (i.e., 5 pg/cm2 divided by 3 to 5 = 1.66 to 1 pg/cm2). If the crop does not cover the sprayed area completely (e.g., in row crops), then the theoretical calculation of the foliar residue still holds true, at least for conventional spraying equipment, as a proportional part of the spray mixture will not reach the foliage but will fall down to the soil. 

In Tables 14.9 and 14.10, the last column reports the environmental impact points (EIPs) for typical applications of organic and conventional pesticides derived from the Pesticide Environmental Assessment System, or PEAS. This model produces relative rankings of risks based on defined use rates and use patterns (the formulation used to apply a pesticide, timing, target of the application, spray equipment used, etc). PEAS scores reflect an equal balancing of acute pesticide risks to farm workers, chronic risks via dietary exposure and exposures to birds, Daphnia and bees. 

Better oil emulsions, better spray equipment, and better education in the application of oil emulsions are all badly needed throughout South America. Fortunately, natural control appears to be taking hold in many districts in Argentina, as it has with Florida red scale, and this will greatly aid the situation. 

An essential part of the development of a new pesticide is establishing a good, dependable formulation. The product s active ingredient and physical properties should remain acceptable for two years or more. These formulations are often subjected to storage conditions of extreme heat, cold, and hiamidity. Once sold to the applicator, the concentrated formulation should dilute easily to field strength and pass freely through conventional spray equipment. 

---