Quality assurance detection limit

It is often deemed that quality assurance serves prevention and quality control detection, but a control installed to detect failure before it occurs serves prevention, such as reducing the tolerance band to well within the specification limits. So quality control can prevent failure. Assurance is the result of an examination whereas control produces the result. Quality assurance does not change the product, quality control does. 

Geifi S, Einax JW (2001) Comparison of detection limits in environmental analysis - is it possible An approach on quality assurance in the lower working range by verification. Fresenius J Anal Chem 370 673... 

From the available literature it becomes clear that method evaluation studies do not surpass the level of within-laboratory performances. Although several of these (see Table 3.3.1) reveal satisfactory levels of quality and environmentally relevant limits of detection, a genuine quality assurance of these methods is still lacking. There are no reports of interlaboratory studies and certified reference materials for surfactants are not available on the market yet. It can therefore be concluded that there remains much to be done in the field of improving and evaluating quality of analytical measurements of surfactants in biota. 

The FSA undertakes surveillance exercises, the data for which are acquired from analytical determinations. The Agency will take measures to ensure that the analytical data produced by contractors are sufficient with respect to analytical quality, i.e. that the results obtained meet predetermined analytical quality requirements such as fitness-for-purpose, accuracy and reliability. Thus when inviting tenders FSA will ask potential contractors to provide information regarding the performance requirements of the methods to be used in the exercise, e.g. limit of detection, accuracy, precision etc., and the quality assurance measures used in their laboratories. When presenting tenders, laboratories should confirm how they comply with these specifications and give the principles of the methods to be used. These requirements extend both to the laboratory as a whole and to the specific analytical determinations being required in the surveillance exercise. The requirements are described in three parts, namely ... 

Chemometric quality assurance via laboratory and method intercomparisons of standardized test data sets, finally, is becoming recognized as essential for establishing the validity of detection decisions and estimated detection limits, especially when treating multidimensional data with sophisticated algorithms including several chemical components. 

Your presentation of methods Have you described your methods accurately, in enough detail that an expert could repeat them Have you paid appropriate attention to detection limits and quality assurance/quality control ... 

Although a thorough validation cannot rule out all potential problems, the process of method development and validation would address the most common ones. Examples of typical problems that can be minimized or avoided include interferences that coelute with the analyte in liquid chromatography (LC), a particular type of column that no longer produces the separation needed because the supplier of the column has changed the manufacturing process, an assay method that is unable to achieve the same detection limit after a few weeks, or a quality assurance audit of a validation report that finds no documentation on how the validation was performed. 

Quality assurance is what we do to get the right answer for our purpose. We begin by writing use objectives, from which specifications for data quality can be derived. Specifications could include requirements for sampling, accuracy, precision, specificity, detection limit, standards, and blank values. For any meaningful analysis, we must first collect a representative sample. In an analysis of standards, the method must produce a result that is acceptably close to the known value. A method blank contains all components except analyte, and it is taken through all steps of the analytical procedure. We subtract the response of the method blank from the response of... 

Quality assurance (QA) is an essential part of analytical protocols. Each laboratory is required to detect and correct problems in analytical processes and to reduce errors to agreed-upon limits. To produce data that have acceptable quality, all laboratory members must follow established guidelines and protocols. Some of the essential elements that must be included in a QA program are as follows ... 

Backup mechanisms for GxP functionality include an independent parallel or downstream component/device to detect any malfunction (e.g., independent monitoring systems). The focus for validation can then shift from the componenPdevice to the backup system, as illustrated in Figure 7.3. Where this implies implementing a backup system that is simpler to validate, the shift can relieve the burden of validating more complex components and devices. For a backup mechanism to be accepted as a validated alternative, it must be able to independently manage key quality assurance functions. Such functions include but are not necessarily limited to ... 

The analysis of VOCs in water and solid samples is complex due to the large number of compounds to be analyzed and because precaution has to be taken to provide accurate and reliable results. The use of P T-GC-MS is the most adequate for trace analysis of VOCs because limits of detection at the ng/L levels can be achieved and confirmatory analysis can be performed. Although P T is a well-established technique, several analytical parameters can be optimized to obtain high sensitivity and selectivity. Eor the specific target analytes, method optimization and quality assurance are necessary. The main drawbacks of this technique result from the fact that high purity gases are required and that the system can... 

In many countries undertaking the most technically demanding analyses, it is expected that the laboratories will be registered under quality assurance schemes. Accuracy and repeatability should be covered by quality assurance requirements, but resolution and detection limits are critically dependent on technique and instrumentation. Details on the general subjects of quality assurance/quality control, quantification of uncertainty in analytical measurements, accreditation of laboratories, and on the general concepts and strategy for ensuring that analytical chemical measurements are comparable - in one word traceability - can be found elsewhere in the chemical literature (26,32-36). 

Quality Control Data. Data obtained from assays of blood gas and pH control materials may be handled in the same way as data from other clinical chemistry determinations (i.e., mean, SD, and coefficient of variation, and control and confidence limits for construction of Levey-Jennings plots). As stability of commercial aqueous control materials is generally several months, vendors often provide data reduction programs that standardize and simplify documentation. However, the resulting reports are temporally delayed and are most useful for meeting accreditation requirements as opposed to real-time corrective or preventive action. They are however useful to compare long-term performances with other laboratories. Equally important features of quality assurance to an active blood gas service are the sixth sense of practiced operators for detecting subtle manifestations of deterioration of instrument performance and the suspicion of trouble expressed by clinicians. 

Different T3 immunoassays may show unexplained discrepancies between values for the same sera. Results from inter-laboratory quality assurance schemes also demonstrate a higher analytical variance for T3 than for T4 methods. Many factors have been suggested as accounting for these disparities, such as the lower quantity of T3 in sera, differences in antisera cross-reactivity, protein interferences, and different assay limits of detection. ... 

In addition to the mass spectral aspects of these assays, which are outlined below, there may also be extensive requirements to be met by the analyst with respect to compliance with good laboratory practice, which governs the operations of analytical laboratories and includes sampling regimes, assay validation procedures (e.g., limits of detection, limits of quantification, accuracy, reproducibility, and ruggedness), and laboratory accreditation (e.g., staff training, laboratory equipment, documentation, quality assurance, and quality control).142-145... 

Lower (i.e.,better) detection limits are achieved with the thermal desorption method owing to the higher aliquot transferred to the analytical device. The shortcoming of the charcoal method is the injection of only a very small part (aliquot) of a sample, which can only be partly compensated by sampling a larger air volume. The disadvantage of the thermal desorption technique is that quality assurance requires the collection of at least duplicate samples. Another disadvantage of this method is the need for special equipment and specially trained personnel. 

External quality assurance (EQA) is fundamental to the standardization of clinical laboratory methods because it provides a means to compare results generated in one laboratory with those of peer laboratories subscribing to the same EQA program. EQA programs are especially beneficial since internal QA and QC procedures are limited in their ability to detect bias in analytical methods. Internal QA/QC can only detect errors that result in a deviation from the original method validation inherent errors in the method may go unnoticed. Therefore, it is helpful to compare the results produced by a new method with those from other laboratories (Burtis and Ashwood, 2001). Monitoring the performance of laboratory procedures in a consistent manner keeps the laboratory accountable, and can reveal systematic errors that would otherwise be undetected. A prominent component of EQA is proficiency testing. 

In addition to the specific comments, the panelists discussed the availability and implications of medical tests to characterize PCB levels in blood, body fat, and breast milk. Though the profile clearly states that routine clinical tests are not available, some panelists suggested that ATSDR include more detailed information on this topic, such as whether tests will be commercially available, how people can get tested by physicians and specialists, and how medical professionals should interpret the significance of measured PCB levels. During this discussion, several panelists indicated that the profile does not acknowledge that no treatments are currently available to reduce body burdens of PCBs. One panelist noted that PCB tests are currently available to physicians, but some testing methods have relatively high detection limits and inadequate quality assurance measures. 

D. R. Gere, L. G. Randall, C. R. Knipe, W. Pipkin, and L. C. Doherty, The Extraction and Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by SFE and GC/MS. Improvement of Net Detection Limits, Paper No 53 Proc. 9th Annual Waste Testing Quality Assurance Symposium, Arlington, VA, pp. 397-405, July 1993. 

In general it is still difficult in the current monitoring programmes to access metadata such as the measurement methods employed, the detection limits of the methods and details of the quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) procedures associated with the reported monitoring activities. What metadata are required for data reporting to the EU Commission under the WED ... 

Three independent laboratories, each using a different method, were selected to analyze crude oil samples. One objective of the project was to identify methods and procedures that could be used by industrial or academic laboratories to analyze crude oil for mercury in a practical fashion. The practicality of a method is a function of sample processing steps, reagent availability, instrumental analysis time, instrument expense, detection limit, and accuracy of result. Crude oils exhibiting total mercury concentrations (THg) below 1-2 pg/kg are not problematic to refining, but some specifications for refined products (naphtha) are set close to 1 pg/kg thus a method detection limit (MDL) of 0.1-0.3 pg/kg was deemed acceptable for routine quality assurance (QA) purposes. Differentiating mercury concentrations below 1 pg/kg may have academic utility, but an MDL of 10 ng/kg (parts per trillion) is not necessary for oil quality determinations or for assessment of atmospheric emissions attributable to petroleum. 

---