Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Method limits

Frequently an analyst must select, from several instruments of different design, the one instrument best suited for a particular analysis. In this section we examine some of the different types of instruments used for molecular absorption spectroscopy, emphasizing their advantages and limitations. Methods of sample introduction are also covered in this section. [Pg.388]

All limits imposed on the model are done using the rows and price inhibitions where possible. Bounds that would provide hard limits using columns are therefore not used. The limits method is used as follows. For equipment capacity, the limit is usually keyed to total feed or some more accurate parameter. So each flow (column) to the equipment draws units of capacity from a capacity tank (row) until the capacity is used up. [Pg.347]

Figure B-18 The one-pole with in-band gain limiting method of compensation. Figure B-18 The one-pole with in-band gain limiting method of compensation.
A modified Payne rearrangement of amino epoxides catalyzed by Lewis acid or induced by base, represents an interesting but a limited method for the synthesis of fonctionalized aziridines of high enantiopurity. The limitations are primarily due to the accessibility of the starting materials (Scheme 6) [15]. [Pg.97]

Limited method development (Hildebrand solubility parameters for solvent choice)... [Pg.120]

Optimisation required for each system (but limited method development)... [Pg.120]

In the common vernacular, the terms specificity and selectivity are often interchangeably used. More properly, a method is said to be specific if it provides a response for only a single analyte, while the term selective means that the method provides responses for a number of chemical entities that may be distinguished from each other. Selectivity also implies the ability to separate the analyte from degradation products, metabolites, and coadministrated drugs [12]. USP 28 [1] defines specificity as the ability to assess the analyte unequivocally in the presence of other components such as impurities, degradation products, and the matrix. IUPAC and AOAC have preferred the use of the term selectivity than specificity for methods that are completely selective, while USP, ICH, and FDA used the term specificity . Due to the very number of limited methods that respond to only one analyte, the term selectivity is usually more suitable, and this usage will be used in this work. [Pg.245]

Standard Error of Estimate Syx = 0.4328 Slope Confidence Limits Method 1... [Pg.410]

Reported concentrations of chromium in open ocean waters range from 0.07 to 0.96 xg/l with a preponderance of values near the lower limit. Methods used for the determination of chromium at this concentration have generally used some form of matrix separation and analyte concentration prior to determination [170-173], electroreduction [174,175] and ion exchange techniques [176,177]. [Pg.156]

Method validation is carried out to provide objective evidence that a method is suitable for a given application. A formal assessment of the validation information against the measurement requirements specification and other important method performance parameters is therefore required. Although validation is described as a sequential process, in reality it can involve more than one iteration to optimize some performance parameters, e.g. if a performance parameter is outside the required limits, method improvement followed by revalidation is needed. [Pg.92]

These methoxylated and acetoxylated seknides are a-perfluoroalkyl mono-selenoacetals, which seem to be useful building blocks similar to those of the sulfur analogues described above. So far, only limited methods have been developed for the preparation of monoselenoacetals and they require rather complicated procedures or special reagents. In this regard, this electrochemical method has advantages since monoselenoacetals can be prepared in a one step reaction under mild conditions. [Pg.36]

The limit method is proposed as detection method in all guidelines. The indication of response is either yes/no or correct/incorrect. The latter, forced choice technique, may certainly give lower odor thresholds. [Pg.66]

Compressor Selection To select the most satisfactory compression equipment, engineers must consider a wide variety of types, each of which offers peculiar advantages for particular applications. Among the major factors to be considered are flow rate, head or pressure, temperature limitations, method of sealing, method of lubrication, power consumption, serviceability, and cost. [Pg.42]

In the synthesis of fluorinated prostanoids, there are still limited methods to introduce fluorine atoms selectively to the target molecule. It is hoped that the development of new fluorination reactions will contribute to the progress on the prostanoid research, and possibly discovery of novel drugs addressing unmet medical needs in future. [Pg.652]

Second method consists of a straightforward discretization method first order (Euler) explicit in time and finite differences in space. Both the time step and the grid size are kept constant and satisfying the Courant Friedrichs Lewy (CFL) condition to ensure the stability of the calculations. To deal with the transport part we have considered the minmod slope limiting method based on the first order upwind flux and the higher order Richtmyer scheme (see, e.g. Quarteroni and Valli, 1994, Chapter 14). We call this method SlopeLimit. [Pg.25]

In JP monographs, the specification value and testing procedure are described as a comparative limit test for the quantity of heavy metals that exist in drug substances as inorganic impurities. The permissible limit on the ppm scale for heavy metals (as Pb) is prescribed as the specification value. From the development stage to the establishment of the limit test method for a monograph, the validation in place has to be done for both the quantitative method for actual measurement and the comparative limit method with the control solution. However, the quantitative procedure has not been stated in the section on the heavy metals limit test in the JP s General Tests and other Japanese official... [Pg.95]

Kach method suffers from one or more inherent sources of error. Method 1 is not readily adaptable to the determination of second explosion limits. If temperature equilibrium is reached very quickly by the gas flowing into the vessel, as the continued flow causes the pressure to increase, the system must first intersect the lower explosion limit. Method 2 can lead to large errors if explosion is preceded by an induction period. In the carbon monoxide-oxygen reaction, for example, it was found that the heating rate could considerably affect the results owing to the existence of a zone of slow reaction adjacent to the second limit and inhibition of the reaction by the product, carbon dioxide... [Pg.102]

The derivatives of all functions can be found using the limit method described in Section 4.2.1. Some of the more common functions, and their derivatives, are listed in Table 4.1. Unless otherwise indicated, the respective domains (Dom) are all values of x ... [Pg.93]

Other sets of electronegativities of the elements have been proposed. The rather direct, but somewhat limited, method of Mulliken makes use of the ionization potential IP and electron-affinity data (Table 3.3). Numerical values are obtained that coincide with values from other methods if electronegativities are calculated from... [Pg.436]

When protein engineering started to become a powerful tool to achieve new or enhanced characteristics, only limited methods were available. [Pg.283]

A second example describes the use of resonant ejection of ions by selected-waveform inverse Fourier transform (SWIFT). Figure 2.26 describes an MS/MS experiment with an instrument using RF voltages applied to the caps, but no DC voltage. In this example, the final analysis of the fragments is performed by the stability limit method. [Pg.113]

Although these values are extremely important quantities, there is no established, general method for measuring them on an absolute basis. Experimental difficulty arises because the species of interest is often a transient, and hence the precise values of its desired physical properties, such as (1) the T-T absorption coefficient and (2) the phosphorescence quantum yield for the specified excitation energy and the specified eigenstate, are not available for the desired spectroscopic analysis. However, some limited methods may be used with adequate caution. These methods involve either luminescence measurement or product analysis ... [Pg.10]

Owing to the instability of these heterocycles and limited methods by which they have been made as unstable intermediates, there is not much to discuss in this section. However, in the next section, there are limited discussions on the various methods for synthesizing precursors to these heterocycles. [Pg.448]

For initially nonpremixed reactants, two limiting cases may be visualized, namely, the limit in which the chemistry is rapid compared with the fluid mechanics and the limit in which it is slow. In the slow-chemistry limit, extensive turbulent mixing may occur prior to chemical reaction, and situations approaching those in well-stirred reactors (see Section 4.1) may develop. There are particular slow-chemistry problems for which the previously identified moment methods and age methods are well suited. These methods are not appropriate for fast-chemistry problems. The primary combustion reactions in ordinary turbulent diffusion flames encountered in the laboratory and in industry appear to lie closer to the fast-chemistry limit. Methods for analyzing turbulent diffusion flames with fast chemistry have been developed recently [15], [20], [27]. These methods, which involve approximations of probability-density functions using moments, will be discussed in this section. [Pg.393]

While modeling approaches are inherently more desirable, empirical methods are presently the only approaches used. As indicated above, simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer is quite complex, requires substantial amounts of computing, and cannot currently predict with requisite accuracy. Our knowledge of turbulent diffusion, of the effects of terrain on ffow patterns, and of energy transfer processes is insufficient now to permit accurate predictions. Investigators have adopted the more reliable, but more limited, methods of interpolation and map construction to specify wind fields. Here, we discuss both approaches— numerical... [Pg.89]


See other pages where Method limits is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.743]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.246]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.306 , Pg.328 ]




SEARCH



Advantages and Limitations of Force Field Methods

Advantages and limits of the method

Alternative method to determine the liquid limit - cone penetrometer

Analytical methods detection limits

Analytical methods limitations

Analytical methods limits of detection

Biological assessment methods limitations

Charcoal separation method limitations

Chemical methods: their limits

Cloning limiting dilution method

Competition methods limitations

Computational methods limitations

Control limit using statistical methods

Definition of PDE. Method for establishing exposure limits

Design limitations imposed by processing method

Destructive sample preparation methods detection limit

Determination methods limitations

Determination of dose and method limits

Diffraction methods experimental limitations

Electrochemical methods detection limits

Electrochemical methods limitations

Electrochemical methods limiting current

Exploring the Scope and Limitation of Our Method

Flammability limits Pintar method

Flammability limits calculation methods

Flavors solubility-limiting methods

Force field methods limitations

Fundamental Limitation on Size of MTS Methods

Hartree-Fock limit method

Hartree-Fock method limitations

Horvath-Kawazoe method limitation

Immunochemical methods performance/limitations

Irradiation method, limitations

Kinetic methods, advantages limitations

Lead Limit Test APDC Extraction Method

Lead Limit Test Graphite Furnace Method

Lead Limit Test Spectrophotometric Method

Limit Equilibrium Methods

Limit test methods

Limit testing method

Limitations and Advantages of Semi-empirical Methods

Limitations of Numerical Methods

Limitations of the method

Limited selective method

Limiting Reactants Comparison-of-Moles Method

Limiting Reactants Smaller-Amount Method

Method Detection Limit

Method detection limit, MDL

Method limit of detection

Method limit of quantitation

Method limitations

Method limitations

Method of the asymptotic limit

Method quantification limit

Method quantitation limit

Method quantization limit

Method valence bond, limited

Methods of Testing for Mass Transfer Limitations

Moisture liquid limit methods

Practical Limitations and Direct Methods

Presumed PDF methods limitations

Recursion method linear limit

Relaxation methods limitations

Screening methods performance/limitations

Self-consistent field method limitation

Semi-empirical electronic structure method limitations

Single-band method limitations

Size-extensivity limited CISD methods

Solubility-limiting methods

Solubility-limiting methods measurement, demonstration

Statistical methods detection limit

Statistical methods determination limit

Test method limiting oxygen index

Testing methods limiting oxygen index

The Limit Method

UNIFAC method limitations

What Are the Limitations of Real-Space Methods on a Single Fine Grid

© 2024 chempedia.info