Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Second limitations

Figure A3.14.4. P-T ignition limit diagram for H2 + O2 system showing first, second and third limits as appropriate to a closed reactor. The first and second limits have similar positions in a typical flow reactor, for which there is also a region of oscillatory ignition as indicated. Figure A3.14.4. P-T ignition limit diagram for H2 + O2 system showing first, second and third limits as appropriate to a closed reactor. The first and second limits have similar positions in a typical flow reactor, for which there is also a region of oscillatory ignition as indicated.
Another way to narrow the choice of methods is to consider the scale on which the analysis must be conducted. Three limitations of particular importance are the amount of sample available for the analysis, the concentration of analyte in the sample, and the absolute amount of analyte needed to obtain a measurable signal. The first and second limitations define the scale of operations shown in Figure 3.6 the last limitation positions a method within the scale of operations. ... [Pg.42]

In the second limiting situation the analyte is a weaker acid or base than the interferent. In this case the volume of titrant needed to reach the analyte s equivalence point is determined by the concentration of both the analyte and the interferent. To account for the contribution from the interferent, an equivalence point for the interferent must be present. Again, if the acid dissociation constants for the analyte and interferent are significantly different, the analyte s determination is possible. If, however, the acid dissociation constants are similar, only a single equivalence point is found, and the analyte s and interferent s contributions to the equivalence point volume cannot be separated. [Pg.313]

The second limitation stems from the insolubilization mechanism operant in these resists. Photoinitiated cross-linking converts the polymer film... [Pg.116]

The second limitation of this pickup is illustrated by an example. Acceleration of one g at 0.5 represents a displacement of 100 inches. It is obvious that in spite of its wide-band response (sometimes 0.1 —15 kH ), it is severely limited at the low end by a poor S/N ratio. [Pg.567]

The second limitation is the life dispersion of machinery components. It is difficult to predict time-dependent failure modes because even they do not occur at the exact same operating intervals. Consider the life dispersion of mechanical gear couplings on process compressors. Both components are clearly subject to wear. If we conclude that their MTBF (mean-time between failure), or mean-time-between-reaching-of-detect-limit is 7.5 years, it is possible to have an early failure after 3 years and another... [Pg.1044]

The second limitation is concerned with the high time constant Tceii determined by the high capacitance of the CLs and by substantial cell resistance. Tceu for a thick MEA of large geometric area may exceed several minutes, thus strongly limiting the application of transient methods and methods based on the concept of impedance. [Pg.518]

In the second limiting case, the rate of reaction with H20 is presumed to be much slower than the rate of radical cation migration and independent of the specific base pair sequence surrounding the GG step. Under these circumstances, each GG step will be equally reactive, and just as much strand cleavage will be observed at the GG step farthest from the AQ as at the one closest to it. [Pg.154]

In the second limit, >> k2,k,.D, back electron transfer to give the excited state is rapid, and eq. 10 applies. [Pg.158]

An analytical proof of the first of these limiting cases follows directly from equations 15.3-3 and -4. As R 0, c Ao - cAo, and 17q, - that for a PFR without recycle. An analytical proof of the second limiting case does not follow directly from these two equations. As R °°, c Ao -> cA1 (from equation 15.3-3), and V/q, -> -(w)(0) (from equation 15.3-4), which is an indeterminant form. The latter can be evaluated with the aid of L Hdpital s Rule, but the proof is left to problem 15-18. [Pg.383]

An ad hoc extension of the method presented above can be formulated for complex chemistry written in terms of yip and . In the absence of chemical reactions, y>rp = 0. Thus, if a second limiting case can be identified, interpolation parameters can be defined to be consistent with the unconditional means. In combusting flows, the obvious second limiting case is the equilibrium-chemistry limit where yip = y>eq( ) (see Section 5.4). The components of the conditional reacting-progress vector can then be approximated by (no summation is implied on a)... [Pg.230]

The second limitation, however, remains i.e., lipoplex stabilization, which prevents DNA release. A combination of solutions should be envisioned for further improvement. For instance, we could combine the postgrafting method with exchangeable PEG. We indeed combined the use of acid-sensitive PEG-lipid and the postgrafting method. Results tend to show an improved DNA release cumulated with higher circulation time (unpublished). However, the differences in tumor growth and vascularization render difficult the obten-tion of significant and reproducible results. [Pg.289]

A second limiting physical/hydrodynamic case is the soil as a porous bed. Often others simulate undisturbed soils in the lab with soil columns, however we have chosen to use a slice of such a column a differential volume reactor (DVR)-as the experimental design (22). This approach offers advantages in the ability to develop a more spatially homogeneous system and also contributes to the perturbation/response analysis needed for systems identification. [Pg.28]

Normally PTs cover only a small part of the laboratory s business. This is the second limitation. A PT analysis... [Pg.305]

Such reactions have been used to explain the three limits found in some oxidation reactions, such as those of hydrogen or of carbon monoxide with oxygen, with an "explosion peninsula between the lower and the second limit. However, the phenomenon of the explosion limit itself is not a criterion for a choice between the critical reaction rate of the thermal theory and the critical chain-branching coefficient of the isothermal-chain-reaction theory (See Ref). For exothermic reactions, the temperature rise of the reacting system due to the heat evolved accelerates the reaction rate. In view of the subsequent modification of the Arrhenius factor during the development of the reaction, the evolution of the system is quite similar to that of the branched-chain reactions, even if the system obeys a simple kinetic law. It is necessary in each individual case to determine the reaction mechanism from the whole... [Pg.229]

There are two limitations to the probe technique first the lack of information on the mechanism or site of reaction just discussed. The second limitation is evident from Eq. 21 as XH is added the process occurs faster and the signal gets smaller. Under some conditions the signal-to-noise may deteriorate significantly at high XH concentrations. [Pg.864]

These results illustrate the inherent capabilities of the voltammetry of microparticles for determining the absolute concentration of analytes in samples from works of art. Here, the most serious limitations are associated with (i) the need for well-defined electrochemical responses, and (ii) the need for relatively high amounts of sample. The second limitation, however, does not apply when relative quantitation procedures are used. As a result, a judicious use of such methodologies can provide valuable information for archaeometry, conservation, and restoration. [Pg.118]


See other pages where Second limitations is mentioned: [Pg.92]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.728]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.970]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.446]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.822]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.57]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.139 ]




SEARCH



Activation energy second limit

Current limit second level

First and second limits (lower pressures)

Inert second limit

Multiconfigurational second-order limits

Nitrogen second limit

Potassium second limit

Second and third limits (higher pressures)

Second explosion limit

Second limits

Second limits in boric acid coated vessels

Second static limit

Second step is rate limiting

© 2024 chempedia.info