Potential, ionization,

To calculate the ionization potential of the sodium atom from spectroscopic data. 

The principal series of lines in the spectrum of sodium vapour arise from transitions between the ground level 3s S and the excited nf P levels. The vacuum wave-numbers a of the lines in the series have been measured to = 73 in the absorption spectrum by Thackeray (Phjre. Rev. 1949, 75, 1840), and five of his results are given in table 1. 

We assume these high excited states to be hydrogen-like and write 

The values of I are almost constant and we take Ilhc = 41 449 cm Therefore 

Direct observation of the series limit gives the somewhat lower value 0 — 41426 cm (Ditchbum, Jutsum, and Marr, Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 1953, 219, 93). 

The tendency of group V elements to fonn simple positive cations increases with increasing atomic weight. This is indicated by the ionisation potentials which become lower as the atomic weight increases (Table 3.5). Conversely, the formation of simple negative anions occurs more readily in compounds of the lighter pnictide elements. All pnictide elanents form polyanions (Chapter 4.1). 

The ionization potential or ionization energy is the energy reqnired to completely remove an electron from an atom in the gas phase (Table 3.5). 

The characteristic radii for the pnictide elements, compiled from various sources and used elsewhere in this book, are listed in Table 3.6. 

---

This missing synuuetry provided a great puzzle to theorists in the early part days of quantum mechanics. Taken together, ionization potentials of the first four elements in the periodic table indicate that wavefiinctions which assign two electrons to the same single-particle fiinctions such as... 

The principles of ion themiochemistry are the same as those for neutral systems however, there are several important quantities pertinent only to ions. For positive ions, the most fiindamental quantity is the adiabatic ionization potential (IP), defined as the energy required at 0 K to remove an electron from a neutral molecule [JT7, JT8and 1191. 

So, within the limitations of the single-detenninant, frozen-orbital model, the ionization potentials (IPs) and electron affinities (EAs) are given as the negative of the occupied and virtual spin-orbital energies, respectively. This statement is referred to as Koopmans theorem [47] it is used extensively in quantum chemical calculations as a means for estimating IPs and EAs and often yields results drat are qualitatively correct (i.e., 0.5 eV). 

Cederbaum L S and Domcke W 1977 Theoretical aspects of ionization potentials and photoelectron spectroscopy a Green s function approach Adv. Chem. Phys. 36 205-344 Oddershede J 1987 Propagator methods Adv. Chem. Phys. 69 201-39... 

The spherical shell model can only account for tire major shell closings. For open shell clusters, ellipsoidal distortions occur [47], leading to subshell closings which account for the fine stmctures in figure C1.1.2(a ). The electron shell model is one of tire most successful models emerging from cluster physics. The electron shell effects are observed in many physical properties of tire simple metal clusters, including tlieir ionization potentials, electron affinities, polarizabilities and collective excitations [34]. 

Figure Cl. 1.3 shows a plot of tire chemical reactivity of small Fe, Co and Ni clusters witli FI2 as a function of size (full curves) [53]. The reactivity changes by several orders of magnitudes simply by changing tire cluster size by one atom. Botli geometrical and electronic arguments have been put fortli to explain such reactivity changes. It is found tliat tire reactivity correlates witli tire difference between tire ionization potential (IP) and tire electron affinity...

Yang S and Knickelbein M B 1990 Photoionization studies of transition metal clusters ionization potentials for Fe... 

Enol ethers (Figure 2-58a) have two electron pairs on the oxygen atom in two different orbitals, one delocalized across the two carbon atoms, the other strictly localized on the oxygen atom (Figure 2-58b). Ionization ftom either of these two orbitals is associated with two quite different ionization potentials, a situation that cannot be handled by the present connection tables. 

Figure 2-58. 2) Enol ethers have two different ionization potentials, depending on b) the orbitals concerned.

In this equation, the electronegativity of an atom is related to its ionization potential, 1, and its electron affinity, E. Mulhken already pointed out that in this definition the ionization potential, and the electron affinity, E, of valence states have to be used. This idea was further elaborated by Hinze et al. [30, 31], who introduced the concept of orbital electronegativity. 

Values for these coefficients, a, b, c, of Eq. (12) can be obtained from the ionization potentials and electron affinities of the neutral, the cationic, and the anionic states of an orbital. 

One early approximation, due to Pariser and Parr [12], was to treat the one-center term y A the difference between the ionization potential IP and the electron affinity EA of A (Eq. (51)). 

In the spirit of Koopmans theorem, the local ionization potential, IPi, at a point in space near a molecule is defined [46] as in Eq. (54), where HOMO is the highest occupied MO, p( is the electron density due to MO i at the point being considered, and ej is the eigenvalue of MO i. 

This quantity is found to be related to the local polarization energy and is complementary to the MEP at the same point in space, making it a potentially very useful descriptor. Reported studies on local ionization potentials have been based on HF ab-initio calculations. However, they could equally well use semi-empirical methods, especially because these are parameterized to give accurate Koopmans theorem ionization potentials. 

Quantum chemical descriptors such as atomic charges, HOMO and LUMO energies, HOMO and LUMO orbital energy differences, atom-atom polarizabilities, super-delocalizabilities, molecular polarizabilities, dipole moments, and energies sucb as the beat of formation, ionization potential, electron affinity, and energy of protonation are applicable in QSAR/QSPR studies. A review is given by Karelson et al. [45]. 

We can compare this result with the experimental first and second ionization potentials (IPs) for helium... 

If we compare the calculated total ionization potential, IP = 4.00 hartiees, with the experimental value, IP = 2.904 hartiees, the result is quite poor. The magnitude of the disaster is even more obvious if we subtract the known second ionization potential, IP2 = 2.00, from the total IP to find t c first ionization potential, IPi. The calculated value of IP2, the second step in reaction (8-21) is IP2 = Z /2 = 2.00, which is an exact result because the second ionization is a one-election problem. For the first step in reaction (8-21), IPi (calculated) = 2.00 and IPi(experimental) = 2.904 — 2.000 =. 904 hartiees, so the calculation is more than 100% in error. Clearly, we cannot ignore interelectronic repulsion. 

The first iteration produces an approximation to the first ionization potential of He that is —(—0.812) hartrees, 10.2% too small. This is a great improvement over the > 100% error we found when the rn term was completely ignored. 

Continue the calculation in Exeivise 8-3 substituting 1.6 as the initial value of P, minimizing to find a new value of a. How much in error is the calculated value of the first ionization potential of He relative to the experimental value of 0.904 hartrees ... 

In eonPast to the low-Ievel ealeulations using the STO-3G basis set, very high level ealeulations ean be earried out on atoms by using the Complete Basis Set-4 (CBS-4) proeedure of Petersson et al. (1991,1994). For atoms more eomplieated than H or He, the first ionization potential (IP[) ealeulation is a many-eleePon ealeulation in which we ealeulate the total energy of an atom and its monopositive ion and determine the IP of the first ionization reaetion... 

Look up the experimental values of the first ionization potential for these atoms and calculate the average difference between experiment and the computed values. Depending on the source of your experimental data, the arithmetic mean difference should be within 0.010 hartrees. Serious departrues from this level of agreement may indicate that you have one or more of your spin multiplicities wrong. 

How many iterations does it take to achieve self-consistency for the helium problem treated (partially) in Exercises 8-3 and 8-4 What is the % discrepancy between the calculated value of the first ionization potential and the experimental value of 0.904 hartiees when the solution has been brought to self-consistency ... 

Use MNDO, AMI, and PM3 (MOPAC, ccl.net) to determine the ionization potential of the hydrogen atom... 

Pij ure 9-3 Partial Output from the MNOO Caleulation of the Ionization Potential of Hydroeen,... 

---