Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Destructive sample preparation methods detection limit

The concentration of metals that are detrimental to catalysts added can vary between 20.0 ppm for Fe to 100 ppm for Ni and lOOOppm for V. The presence of these metals necessitates the need for analysis of these metals to determine their concentrations prior to the cracking process. The best method to analyse these oil samples needs to be rapid and accurate. Careful selection of the method either from experience or by trial and error may be applied depending on the metal and the concentration. Sample dissolution in a solvent or solvent mixture is considered the easiest but may not be suitable for low limits of detection. Destructive sample preparation methods, i.e. oxygen bomb combustion, microwave acid digestion followed by pre-concentrating may be required for trace analysis and/or with the aid of a hyphenated system, e.g. ultrasonic nebuliser. Samples prepared by destmctive methods are dissolved in aqueous solutions that have very low matrix and spectral interferences. [Pg.143]

New methods for non-destructive quantitative analysis of additives based on MIR spectra and multivariate calibration have been presented [67, 68], One of the limitations in the determination of additive levels by MIR spectroscopy is encountered in the detection limit of this technique, which is usually above the low concentration of additive present, due to their heavy dilution in the polymer matrix. The samples are thin polymer films with small variations in thickness (due to errors in sample preparation). The differences in thickness cause a shift in spectra and if not eliminated or reduced they may produce non-reliable results. Methods for spectral normalisation become necessary. These methods were reviewed and compared by Karstang et al. [68]. MIR is more specific than UV but the antioxidant content may be too low to give a suitable spectrum [69]. However, this difficulty can be overcome by using an additive-free polymer in the reference beam [67, 68, 69, 70]. On the other hand, UV and MIR have been successfully applied to quantify additives in polymer extracts [71, 72, 66]. [Pg.215]

Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) has become one of the preferred techniques in aroma analysis, offering solvent fi ee, rapid sampling with low cost and easy preparation. Also, it is sensitive, selective and compatible with low detection limits [18]. Placed in the sample headspace, SPME is a non-destructive and non-invasive method to evaluate volatile and semi-volatile compounds. In this sense, the extraction of volatile compounds released from a great number of foods has been carried out by using HS-SPME technique [29, 33],... [Pg.5]


See other pages where Destructive sample preparation methods detection limit is mentioned: [Pg.250]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.2989]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.227]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.98 ]




SEARCH



Destruction method

Destructive methods

Destructive sample preparation methods

Detectable limit

Detection limits

Detection limits, limitations

Detection methods

Detection-limiting

Limit method

Method Detection Limit

Method limitations

Sample detection

Sample methods

Sample preparation limited

Sample preparation method

Sampling methods

© 2024 chempedia.info