Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Control in solution

It seems also meaningful to recall that, for both PVL and iPP, the metastable chiral modification is not obtained from solution. This fact is hard to rationalize if polymorphic discrimination occurs on the basis of the secondary nucleation site which should exist also in the presence of the solution it rather points to diffusion and to transport problems in the melt, or thermodynamic control in solution. [Pg.119]

The following additions are made to each tube of top agar the test article (or solvent control) in solution (10-200 pi), the test strain (100 pi) and, where necessary, S9 mix (500 pi). The test is carried out in the presence and absence of S9 mix. The exact volume of test article or solvent may depend on toxicity or solubility, as described in the preceding section. [Pg.198]

Several reviews deal with the solid-state reactions of simple inorganic salts and of organic compounds.1-8 The essential differences between solid-state reactions and reactions in solution can be ascribed to the fact that solid-state reactions occur within the constraining environment of the crystal lattice. The reactant crystal lattice can control both the kinetic features of a reaction, and the nature of the products. In many solid-phase reactions the separation distances and mutual orientations of reactants in the solid determine the product. Such reactions are said to be topo-chemically controlled.9 Topochemical control of a reaction product is analogous to kinetic control in solution. The product is not necessarily the thermodynamically most stable product available to the system, but is rather the one dictated by the reaction pathway available in the constraining environment of the solid. [Pg.463]

Studies with aqua species of Ni11 showed a marked preference for G-rich oligonucleotides (K0 2 X 105 M 1 for poly(dG)-poly(dC)), an association that is actually followed by the reversible binding of nickel to a G-N(7) [88], This case can be considered as intermediate between that of Mg11 and that of the aqua platinum(II) complexes which will irreversibly bind to a guanine after outer-sphere association. The corresponding kinetic equation can be written as in Scheme 3. The formation of the outer-sphere association is likely to be diffusion controlled in solution, in vitro. The coordination step (k) should be rate-determining [95]. [Pg.235]

Finally we note that studies of control in solution [186, 187] indicate that control in the presence of collisional effects is indeed possible. For example, coherent control of the dynamics of I3 in ethanol and acetonitrile has been demonstrated. Specifically, I3 was excited with a 30-fs ultraviolet (UV) laser pulse to the first excited state, The resultant wave function was comprised of a localized wave function on the ground electronic state and a corresponding depletion of wave function density, that is, a hole, on the ground electronic state. In this instance the target of the control was the nature of the spectrum associated with the coherences associated with the symmetric stretch. By manipulating various attributes of the exciting pulse (intensity, frequency, and chirp of the excitation pulse), aspects of the spectrum were controlled, despite the decoherence associated with collision effects. [Pg.106]

Davey, R. Blagden, N. Righini, S. Ahson, H. Ferrari, E. Nucleation control in solution mediated polymorphic phase transformations the case of 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1954-1959. [Pg.857]

Davey ly, Blagden N, Righini S, Alison H, and Ferrari ES. Nucleation Control in Solution Mediated Polymorphic Phase Transformations The Case of 2,6-Dihydroxybenzoic Acid./P/iyi ChemB2002 106 1954—1959. [Pg.104]

We use here the independent variables T, P, N. These are the most common variables that are controlled in solution chemistry. In writing (7.16), we... [Pg.197]

Although the [2 + 2] photocycloaddition is preferably prevented in the synthesis of PAHs, it has been proven to be a very feasible approach in the selective synthesis of syn-[2.2]cyclophanes [86,87]. Topological reaction control in solution has been achieved for a multistep intramolecular [2 + 2] cycloaddition reaction in the photochemical formation of [n]-ladderanes from pseudo-gem-bis(polyene) substituted [2.2]paracyclophanes [88]. The probably most well-known example of an intramolecular photocycloaddition process is one of the... [Pg.58]

The explanation for this phenomenon is related to the ct diat in solution, these hydrogen abstraction reactions are nearly diffusion-controlled. Thus, the intrinsic selectivity (observed in the gas phase) is obscured in solution because of the onset of diffusion control In solution because of increased viscosity, the rate of hydrogen abstraction is governed to a greater extent by the rate of encounter of 23DM6 and... [Pg.260]

Soluble Poisons. The use of soluble neutron absorbers (boron, cadmium, and gadolinium) for, criticaliUr control in solutions of U and u has berai demonstrated in plant-scale operations by the Idaho Nuclear Corporation, Nuclear Fuel Services, hic., and the Oak Ridge National laboratory. This work forms a precedent for use of the method in systems having large volumes and throu puts, and demimstrates procedures for controlling solution stabill and concentrations. [Pg.341]

STRUCTURAL CONTROL IN SOLUTION STYRENE-BUTADIENE RUBBERS USING ANIONIC CATALYST SYSTEMS... [Pg.3]

The overall morphology of the wax copolymer aggregates at the micrometric scale was also investigated by optical and transmission electron microscopy as complementary techniques for the USANS investigations. The results obtained allowed the clarification of the self-assembled structures in solution of the crystalhne-amorphous random copolymers. This has led to a broader understanding of wax crystal modification and control in solution than previously available. As noted, SANS is the required technique to study these hydrocarbon mixtures since contrast is easily achieved via the judicious mixture of hydrogenated and deuterated materials. As detailed experimentation has shown [7-18], this experimental capacity is vital for a complete... [Pg.9]

Sample injections are typically performed at flow rates of 5-30 pi min using sample concentrations corresponding to the affinity of the interaction (Ad, affinity dissociation constant). A measurement will immediately give an answer as to whether binding occurs or not. Nevertheless, each response should be verified through a surface and a sample control. A second trace on the same sensor chip, chemically modified in the same manner as the active surface (e.g. activated/ deactivated), usually serves as a control channel. However, an optimized reference surface carries an inactive molecule, which is similar to the active molecule and immobilized at the same amount. Negative samples like non-specific proteins or carbohydrates, or inactive extracts, serve as a control in solution. [Pg.1051]


See other pages where Control in solution is mentioned: [Pg.843]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.843]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.4238]    [Pg.759]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.881]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.274]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.104 ]




SEARCH



Controlled Reactions of Uncharged Nonpolar Species in Solution

Controlled Self-assembly in Solution

Diffusion-controlled reactions in solution, spin statistics

© 2024 chempedia.info