Electrochemical methods limiting current

It is the purpose here to briefly review the state of the art of the most important electrochemical methods for medical applications, and report on the status and viability of currently emerging research. To accomplish this, electrochemical methods have been divided into four basic categories. The first two categories (Sect. 2 and 3) represent the relatively mature contribution of electrochemistry to medical diagnostics. Sections four and five deal largely with developments in electrochemistry which have not yet achieved commercialization, but which have the greatest likelihood of future success. There are, of course, some minor areas of research which have been intentionally omitted because of space limitations. Much of this work can be found in the references provided in the text. 

The use of conventional electrochemical methods to study the effect of metal adatoms on the electrochemical oxidation of an organic adsorbate may be in some cases of limited value. Very often, in the potential region of interest the current due to the oxidation of an organic residue is masked by faradaic or capacitive responses of the cocatalyst itself. The use of on-line mass spectroscopy overcomes this problem by allowing the observation of the mass signal-potential response for the C02 produced during the oxidation of the adsorbed organic residue. 

The basic theory of mass transfer to a RHSE is similar to that of a RDE. In laminar flow, the limiting current densities on both electrodes are proportional to the square-root of rotational speed they differ only in the numerical values of a proportional constant in the mass transfer equations. Thus, the methods of application of a RHSE for electrochemical studies are identical to those of the RDE. The basic procedure involves a potential sweep measurement to determine a series of current density vs. electrode potential curves at various rotational speeds. The portion of the curves in the limiting current regime where the current is independent of the potential, may be used to determine the diffusivity or concentration of a diffusing ion in the electrolyte. The current-potential curves below the limiting current potentials are used for evaluating kinetic information of the electrode reaction. 

Only a few reviews have appeared in which application of the limiting-current method is discussed from a chemical engineering viewpoint. In the review of Tobias et al (T3) mentioned earlier, the authors examined the knowledge available on electrochemical mass transport during the early stages of its application in 1952. Ibl (II) reviewed early work on free convection, to which he and his co-workers contributed notably by development of optical methods for study of the diffusion layer. A discussion of the application of optical techniques for the study of phase boundaries has been given by Muller (M14). 

In 1971 Mizushina (M9) reviewed the limiting-current method with particular emphasis upon shear-stress and fluid-velocity measurements. Mass-transfer measurements, that is, limiting-current measurements in the original more restricted sense, are documented fairly extensively. The electrochemical analysis of limiting-current measurements is touched upon, but not elaborated. 

From an analysis of the electrochemical mass-transfer process in well-supported solutions (N8a), it becomes evident that the use of the molecular diffusivity, for example, of CuS04, is not appropriate in investigations of mass transfer by the limiting-current method if use is made of the copper deposition reaction in acidified solution. To correlate the results in terms of the dimensionless numbers, Sc, Gr, and Sh, the diffusivity of the reacting ion must be used. 

The limiting-current method has been used widely for studies in packed and fluidized beds (see Table VII, Part H). Limiting current measurements in these systems overlap in part with the design and analysis of packed-bed and fluidized-bed electrochemical reactors in particular the potential distribution in, and the effectiveness of, such reactors (for example, for metal removal from waste streams) is an extensive area of research, which cannot be covered in this review. For a complete discussion of porous flow-through electrodes the reader is referred to Newman and Tiedemann (N8d). 

Takamura et al. have reported an electrochemical method for the determination of chlorpromazine with an anodically pretreated vitreous carbon electrode [164]. Optimal conditions for the pre-treatment were attained by the anodic oxidation of vitreous carbon electrodes in 0.5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.7) at 1.6 V V5. S.C.E. for 2 minutes. This was found to enhance the oxidation peak of the cyclic voltammogram for chlorpromazine by a factor of simeq 30. The peak current at +0.75 V was directly proportional to the concentration of chlorpromazine over the range of 0.2-40 pM and the detection limit was 0.1 pM. 

Currently, there is a need for high-throughput determination of nucleic acid sequences. At present, detection systems most commonly employ fluorescence-based methods. However, wide spread applications of such methods are limited by low speed, high cost, size, and number of incubations steps, among other factors. Application of electrochemical methods in affinity DNA sensors presents likely a promising alternative, allowing miniaturization and cost reduction, and potentially allowing application in point-of-care assays. 

A perfect prototype of an ideally cation-permselective interface is a cathode upon which the cations of a dissolved salt are reduced. Experimental polarization curves measured on metal electrodes fit the theory very closely. Since in dimensional units the limiting current is proportional to the bulk concentration, the polarization measurements on electrodes may serve for determining the former. This is the essence of the electrochemical analytical method named polarography. (For the theory of polarographical methods see [28]—[30].)... 

The use of polarographic assays for the determination of drugs in blood is the most demanding on the detection limitations of the technique. Differential pulse polarography, stripping voltammetry, and LCEC are the only electrochemical methods currently available for routine determination of drugs below 1.0 ng/mL of blood. 

Electrochemical methods are very useful in structural studies but are barely applicable for preparative aims. The cause is the limited stability of cation radicals. It is difficult to do low-temperature preparative electrolysis, and the main problem is to dispose of the large amount of heat generated during the electrode work. That is, not much current can be passed through an ordinary-sized electrode without generating too much heat. When potential and temperature control are necessary, only small quantities of a material can be obtained in a reasonable period of time. When potential and temperature control are not necessary, as in Kolbe electrolysis, anodic oxidation is indeed useful as a preparative method. 

What is wrong with the assumption of purely one-dimensional diffusion It turns out that a small-diameter rotating disk may be more appropriately described by hemispherical diffusion. The limiting current density in the hemispherical case is greater than that in the linear case by a factor that remains constant with time and rotation rate. This situation is in fact observed in Fig. 39, which compares the experimental data to the predicted results assuming ID diffusion. (See Bard and Faulkner. Electrochemical Methods-Fundamentals and Applications, pp. 136-146.)... 

Spectroelectrochemistry — Many - electrode processes are complex and difficult to study quantitatively and unambiguously. The current signal from voltammetric experiments provides only very limited structural information about reaction intermediates at surfaces or in solution. In order to improve the level of quantitative and structural information available from electrochemical experiments, spectroscopic techniques are directly (or in situ ) coupled to electrochemical methods [i, ii]. 

As the main aim of trace analysis is usually determination of the mass (expressed as the number of moles) of a given component in a studied sample, molar concentration is generally not used. Some exceptions are electrochemical methods, where the analytical signal (e.g., current intensity) is a direct function of molar concentration [9]. Therefore, in voltamperometric techniques the detection limits are usually given in molar concentration units (Table 1.2). Thus, for nickel (molar mass M = 58.7 g/mol) the detection limit in inverse voltammetry is approximately 6 X 10 mol/L, and is expressed as a mass fraction, 3.5 x 10 g/dm, or as a percentage, 0.35 x 10 %. In spectrophotometry, when concentrations are given in molar units then molar absorptivities are also used. For example, molar absorptivity e = 5xl0 " L/mol cm corresponds (for molar mass M = 58.7 g/mol) to molar absorptivity a = 5 x 10 /(58.7 x 10 )mL/g cm (i.e., 0.85 mL/g cm). 

Scherer and Willig (65) have studied the rate enhancement, due to cations and protons, of electron transfer from the surface of an organic insulator crystal, such as perylene, to oxidized ions, such as [Fe(CN)g] and fMo(CN)g] ", in solution. In an electrochemical method such as this, the saturation current directly renders the rate constant for electron transfer at the crystal surface. Furthermore, electron transfer on [Fe(CN)6l or [Mo(CN)g] can be studied in the absence of reduced forms, whereas the salt effect can be measured up to the solubility limit. They found that for the same concentration of added electrolyte, rate constants increased with the increased charge of the cation. Up to s 1M rate enhancement was of the order Li < Na < Cs but at salt concentrations >3.5 M a reversal that could be explained by different hydrations of the cations took place. They also found a good linear correlation in the shift to higher redox potentials (simultaneously increasing rate constants) with higher salt concentrations. 

In practice there are several limitations to such measurement. Obviously it implies that both members of the half-reaction are sufficiently stable for a cell to be realized. This is a serious difficulty in organic chemistry owing to usual great reactivities of the species formed upon electron transfers. For the most frequent cases it is then impossible to rely on reversible thermodynamic transformations to determine experimental values of standard reduction potentials. However, these important figures, or at least very precisely approximated values, can be obtained from current intensity potential curves or transient electrochemical methods as is discussed in a later section. 

---