Leadership, safety

Hunt et al. (1993) reach similar conclusions. In their survey, active safety leadership, safety diligence, proactive RTW program, and safety training proxy some of the same dimensions that we have included under Management Safety Culture. In their study, they also find that these are effective mechanisms through which to promote health and safety, and their empirical data suggest that there is also a relative abundance of variation in these practices across their sample of relatively large firms (Hunt et al. 1993, Table 4.2). 

Safety leadership Safety leadership is establishing a responsible safety protocol and having the integrity and conviction to follow it. ... 

It is notable that there were significantly positive correlations between the rate of Level 0 and 1 and a number of safety culture factors leadership safety awareness competence awareness collectivism-individualism and team/stress management. 

Investing in our people is our strategic priority, whether this involves ethical leadership, safety issues [...] ... 

The philosophy behind most modern safety programs involves the prevention of accidents. Successful accident prevention depends on three basic elements safe working environments, safe working practices, and effective leadership. Safety programs for process technicians usually include elements of the following topics ... 

Leadership Safety Values and Actions— leaders demonstrate a commitment to safety in their decisions and behaviors ... 

These tend to find expression and amplification via motherhood issues such as Policy, Leadership, Safety Culture, Training, Coaching, Communications, Self-analysis, Audit and so on. The reader is then left to assess whether the issue affects his particular organisation, and, if so, how he should decide how to introduce the necessary corrective actions. 

The new conduct we wanted to encourage in NASA s first-line supervisors—branch chiefs—included a set of critical behaviors that exemplified NASA s core values, behaviors needed to close the gap between the current state and the leadership safety vision, such as communication, consideration for individuals, management consistency, and decision making (Figure 10-3). Together with NASA we reviewed the behaviors at each location where the culture change effort was to be implemented. This review verified the relevance of the behaviors to each location and developed examples of how each behavior would be manifested... 

FIGURE 10-3. FIRST-LINE SUPERVISOR CRITICAL LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO NASA S LEADERSHIP SAFETY VISION. 

The authors hope that this book is used by the leadership, safety professionals, safety educators, and students of safety management for developing the focal point for a successful safety system, the JHA. 

Leadership Safety Values and Actions. Loss prevention is treated as a complex and systematic concern. It is an organizational value that is reflected in the decision making and daily operations of an organization in managing risk and preventing incidents. 

Similar as to quality, management should demonstrate indeed more than arm s length support for safety and safety improvement leading to the highest possible safety standards. Involved leadership and constancy of purpose is critical. 

These timeframes are guesstimates at this point, and are subject to change. Similarly, at each stage of the process there will be a number of activities that may affect overall scheduling. On completion of this process, we are confident that Company X will be well on its way toward achieving its goal of industry leadership in process safety management. 

On completion of this process. Company X expects to be weil on its way toward achieving its goat of industry leadership in process safety management. 

Safety achievement is a team approach. All parties to the operation must participate and contribute. Without team cohesiveness, commitment and accountability objectives will not be met. Specifically important is the leadership of a team, which in business operations is the senior management. 

In addition to coordinating information, this source could also spearhead related efforts, such as those proposed in the National Safety First Initiative. In these such initiatives, the basic premises involve issues related to safety criteria, verification standards, follow-up standards, and safety leadership standards (Golodner, 2002 Kapuscinski, 2002). 

The keystone of managing chemical reactivity hazards is line responsibility. The "line" referred to here is the chain of command and authority that extends from the operator to the chief executive officer of the company. When all the advice and consultation is gathered relative to an issue, such as from relevant area experts and safety personnel, it is the business responsibility to provide leadership. It does so by communicating values, setting policy, making appropriate decisions, allocating the necessary resources, and following up to ensure implementation. 

Therefore, awareness that influences willingness, and leadership, but also new forms of communication and cooperation and a possible shift in corporate (safety) culture, are all crucial elements for ISP. Good and successful examples set by companies seen as peers may also strongly stimulate industry. Indeed, the production of the same pesticide produced by Union Carbide in Bhopal using a batch process was accomplished by DuPont using an inherently safer continuous flow process. 

The chapter, Safety Matrix People Applying Technology to Yield Safe Chemical Plants and Products by Davis of Dow Chemical, is concerned with protecting and improving safety in chemical plants. Dow Chemical has dramatically improved its safety record and seized a leadership position among chemical companies in the past decade. This improvement is not an accident, but the result of a dedicated attitude and systemic application that should be exported to the entire chemical industry. The lessons here would make us all winners and demonstrate that the chemical engineers are the solutions rather than the problems. 

National Center for Patient Safety (NCPS). 2001a. Healthcare failure mode and effect analysis. In Strategies for Leadership. Ann Arbor, MI Department of Veterans Affairs, National Center for Patient Safety. 

---