User safety assessment risks

Special models and programs are developed for such purposes as health and safety management and assessment, risk analysis and assessment, emission control and detection and quality control. Such a program may, for example, help the user to keep records regarding training, chemical inventories, emergency response plans, material safety data, sheet expiry dates and so on. 

GLP embodies a set of principles that provide a framework within which studies are planned, performed, monitored, recorded, reported and archived. These studies are undertaken to generate data by which the hazards and risks to users, consumers, and third parties, including the environment, can be assessed for pharmaceuticals, agrochemicals, veterinary medicines, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, food and feed additives, and biocides. GLP helps assure regulatory authorities that the data submitted are a true reflection of the results obtained during the study and can therefore be relied upon when making risk/safety assessment decisions. 

The chemical safety assessment has to consider the manufacture or preparation of the substance as well as all identified uses. An identified use is a use of a substance or preparation containing it that is intended by a person involved in the supply chain or that is made known to him in writing by an immediate downstream user. The assessment shall consider all stages of the life cycle of the substance resulting from its manufacture and identified uses. The assessment has to be based on a comparison of the potential adverse effects of the substance with the known or reasonably foreseeable exposure of man or the environment, taking into account implemented and recommended risk management measures and operational conditions. 

From the preceding, it is clear that SIS and reliability go hand-in-hand. A functional safety assessor (FSA) assesses the safety assessment/analysis report (SAR) after SIS is developed to check the system reliability and SIL. In order to achieve a tolerable risk level, the end-user, who needs to install SISs in the plant, initiates SIS projects. Detailed process outline for the same has heen elaborated as follows ... 

Cenfral to regisfration is fhe Chemical Safety Assessment (CSA), in which the registrant identifies and describes the conditions under which the manufacturing and use of a subsfance are considered to be safe. A CSA must be performed by registianfs for substances manufactured and imported in quantities at or above 10 tonnes per year and by downstream users if their uses are not addressed by their supplier. The CSA entails three major steps, hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization, which are documented in the Chemical Safety Report (CSR). Figure 3.4 summarizes the process [95]. 

ESC Limited has appiied its 100+ combined years of technicai safety know-howto deveiop ProSET The Compiete Process Safety Evaiuation Tooiset, a famiiy of moduies aiiowing the user to compiete risk assessment activities as part of the Functionai Safety Lifecycie, as required by intemationai standards such as iEC 61508 and iEC 61511. 

Directive No. 89/391/EC, on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers, defines the employer s commitment to perform risk analyses at a workplace (Section II, Article 6, Paragraph 2, 3) and notify workers of same (Section II, Article 10, Paragraph 1). The enactment defines principles of occupational health and safety with the main principles being the commitment of designers, project engineers, and users of machines and machinery to assess risks. 

K. N. Woodward, Assessment of user safety, exposure and risk to veterinary medicinal products in the European Union, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 2008, 50, 114-128. 

The safety/risk criteria. The safety/risk criteria establish the top-level system safety requirements, or objectives. Regulatory authorities may have different definitions for the various categories of hazards/accidents. To be able objectively to distinguish and evaluate the various hazards present, it is important to define the exact terminology and to allocate a measure of performance. This is an important (and arguably most neglected) topic as it is the safety acceptance criteria the system is expected to achieve, and hence the measure (or standard) the assessment will compare the system against. For more detail on safety criteria, see Appendix B. The system level. Define the systems level at which safety is to be assessed. The importance of this step is explained in Section 8.3 above. A safety assessment by a supplier of a component (e.g. a flare dispenser) will vastly differ in scope and approach to a safety assessment for a product (e.g. an aircraft) or user system (e.g. a facility). 

Safety Monitor is an interactive computer program (Stamm, 1996) that performs real-time assessments of configuration-specific plant accident risk. Originally used at Southern California Edison s San Onofre station in 1994, further development was sponsored by three nuclear utilities and EPRI, to include shutdown operation and expanded user features. It will be enhanced to calculate large early release frequency (a Level 2 risk). 

Exposure scenarios specify the conditions in which the chemical is to be used (including the protective equipment to be used, working practices, products it is incorporated into, how consumers use those products and how these are disposed), limiting the range of the conditions that must be considered in the exposure assessment. The exposure scenario is annexed to the chemical safety data sheet that is passed to downstream users of the chemical. Those downstream users are required to pass information back to their suppliers about their use of the substance, the exposure to the substance involved in that use and the practicality of specified risk reduction measures. If a use is significantly different from those identified in the CSA, the user must report this to the European Chemicals Agency and prepare its own CSA, or ask the manufacturer to revise the CSA to include that use. 

Gather the requirements for the systems including functional (e.g. operational checks) requirements, nonfunctional (e.g., coding standards) requirements, users, company-wide regulatory compliance (e.g., Part 11 technical control), safety, process, and other applicable requirements Characterize information, assess its value to the organization, and incorporate information quality as part of the project plan Conduct a system (hardware, software, and process) risk analysis. New requirements may be found as the result of the risk analysis. Any new requirements must be documented in the requirements specification deliverable... 

In contrast to chemicals, biomaterial and medical device testing constitutes an extremely diverse, heterogeneous category of evaluation. Because the use of these products normally entails direct or indirect contact with patients, there is an obligation for manufacturers to establish the product s safety before marketing. Medical device safety evaluation assesses the risk of adverse effects due to normal use and misuse. Since adverse effects could result from exposure to the materials from which a device is made, preclinical assessment is needed to minimize the potential hazard to the user, namely, the patient. 

Supervision of producers and importers as primary suppliers of chemicals is a task requiring specific skills and qualifications on the part of inspectors, e.g. in toxicology and hazard assessment. To supervise retail sales is a simpler type of control. Supervision of users is, again, more complex, requiring still other types of inspector skills and qualifications for assessment of exposure and of risks, control of technical safety measures, etc. 

Safety invariably all laboratory experiments carry some risk, associated with the chemicals or apparatus to be used. It is usual to perform a COSHH assessment (p. 7) prior to experimental work. Computational chemistry allows the user to carry out work on dangerous chemicals with no risk ... 

---