Risk/safety assessment

You must cairy out fire risk assessments, h the same way as you do for health and safety risk assessments. 

Includes quality and safety risk assessments and international regulations, as well as lists of formerly and newly approved colorants and additives... 

Joseph F. Louvar retired as director of BASF s Chemical Engineering Department to become a professor at Wayne State University, specializing in chemical process safety, risk assessment, and the design of experiments. He has authored many publications on process safety and chairs the Undergraduate Education Committee of the CCPS. 

Pitblado, R. M., S. J. Shaw, and G. Stevens, "The SAFETY Risk Assessment Package and Case Study Applications," in Proceedings of the Safety and Loss Prevention, Chemical and Oil Industries, A4, Singapore (1989). 

Fact sheet Interim melamine and analogues safety/risk assessment. Washington,... 

In November 2000, the Commission proposed the creation of a European Food Authority (EFA), which would take over responsibility for much of the food safety risk assessment work at present carried out by the Commission and... 

Pitblado, R. M., Shaw, S. J., and Sevens, G. (1990) Inst Chem Eng Sym Ser. No. 120, 51. The SAFETI risk assessment package and case study application. 

See also Benchmark Dose Chemical-Specific Adjustment Factor (CSAF) Environmental Protection Agency, US International Programme on Chemical Safety Risk Assessment, Human Health Uncertainty Analysis. 

The history of health and safety regulation reflects a continuing evolution of assessment of health risks from the chemicals in our environment — whether those chemicals are in food, drugs, other consumer products, the workplace, or the air that we breath and the water that we drink. As science has become more refined, so has safety/risk assessment. Regulators throughout history have used the best form of safety/risk assessment available at any particular time, but no one has ever believed, or believes now, that an adequate safety/risk assessment methodology has been found. In this field, as in most other fields of scientific endeavor, there is still a great deal to be learned. 

This paper traces some of the relevant statutory and regulatory history in the field of health and safety. It discusses legal principles involved in use of safety/risk assessment under current Federal statutes. 

All health and safety regulation depends upon some form of safety/risk assessment. That assessment may be either qualitative or quantitative in nature. But no regulatory action can be taken in the field of health and safety without some assessment of the safety/risk involved. 

It is a truism that, at any particular time in history, the approaches to safety/risk assessment then in use are not perfect. It is equally true that, with time, they will improve. Regulatory decisions, on the other hand, cannot await development of a perfect, or even a better, methodology for assessing safety/risk. They must be made at that time, with the best means currently available.(48)... 

Thus, a regulator must use the best available approach at that moment to analyze toxicity data and to make a reasonable regulatory decision. Statutory language is not dispositive of this matter, and is not even helpful. It offers no direction to the regulator. Regardless of the specific statutory safety/risk standard invoked, the safety/risk assessment approach to be used in any particular situation, at any particular time, is necessarily left to the judgment and discretion of the agency. 

There is no statutory prohibition, in any of the current Federal health and safety laws, in making daily regulatory decisions utilizing quantitative safety/risk assessment based upon extrapolation from animal toxicity studies. Indeed, the court cases already discussed, from 1914 to the present, lead inexorably to this approach. 

I have attempted to redirect the present book to those whose career may be in food safety, risk assessment, or toxicology because they are often unaware of how the science of these disciplines may be misinterpreted or misdirected. These issues are not covered in academic and scholarly textbooks. Conclusions published in the scientific literature may be misdirected to support positions that the data actually counter. This may often occur simply because the normal statement of scientific uncertainty (required to be stated when any conclusion is made in a scientific publication) is hijacked as the main findings of the study. These pitfalls must be brought to the attention of working scientists so conclusions from research studies can be crafted to avoid this pitfall. 

Bowin J (1999) Child safety risk assessment and design solutions. Child Safety, 1st Edn. Standar-diseringsgmppen STG och SIS Forlag AB. 

Risk assessment is a process used to systematically identify, understand, and ultimately make informed decisions regarding the options available to manage risk and for continuous improvement of the transportation operation/network. The steps involved in a safety risk assessment, as illustrated in Figure 3.1, include ... 

Figure 13.8. a) Comparison of safety risk assessment and risk management and b) general principles of FMECA approaches (failure mode, effects and criticality analysis) applied to materials in contact with food... 

Swimming pools/gymnasium/playground arrangements, guidelines, special instructions Record keeping, checklist regarding safety Risk assessments/fieldwork policies/special procedures, e.g. absence, additional support... 

Shyur, Huan-Jyh. 2008. A quantitative model for aviation safety risk assessment. Computers IndustrialEn neer-ing. 54 34-44... 

LuxhaJ, XT. (2003). Probabilistic Causal Analysis for System Safety Risk Assessments in Commercial Air Transport. Workshop on Investigating and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents (IRIA). Williamsburg, Virginia, USA, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

Walls 1. Scott V. (1997). Use of predictive microbiology in microbial food safety risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiology. 36, pp. 97-102. 

Most conventional land-based contractors equipment can be employed on the shore-based aspects of coastal and maritime works (Figures 5.1 to 5.3). Normal safety risk assessment applies to the use of this equipment, but some items of plant and their use require specific site-based consideration. An example of this is the use of dump trucks on beaches. This particular equipment is susceptible to variable ground conditions and can easily overturn if a patch of soft sand is hit. 

In 1996 the NR A (now part of the Environment Agency) undertook a review on public safely access to the coastal environment. The overall purpose of that research (Environment Agency, 1996 and 1997) was to assist the authority to define a consistent policy for responding to public safety issues and to provide a system for determining appropriate responses. While this research has not resulted in any formal policy, it is worth noting that as a result of this work the Agency now has a process of Public Safety Risk Assessment which is mandatory for all new EA projects. 

The facility system safety risk assessment process works such that if the initial risk assessment produces a RAC of 1 or 2, some type of control must be applied. After this control is applied, a second risk assessment or controlled RAC is determined. First, the control rating code is evaluated to ensure that the CRC rules have been met and then to ensure that the controlled RAC is 3 or 4. If the CRC rules are met and the controlled RAC is 3 or 4, the corrective action is taken and the risk has been reduced to an acceptable level. However, if the CRC rules have not been met and/or the RAC remains at 1 or 2, other controls must be applied and the reassessment cycle is repeated. If other controls are not available, then risk acceptance decisions must be made by the appropriate level of management, and risk acceptance decisions must be documented (Fig. 11-4). 

---