Safety observations naming

Some jobs involve only a few simple, routine tasks. Others involve doing many tasks, some more often than others. It is important to keep records of observations. See Table 14.1 for an example of a Job Safety Observation Form. The results will tell each supervisor just what has been or should be done about a particular worker. A Job Safety Observation Form contains the employee s name, department, job title, and a list of the tasks performed when doing that job. If the employee has completed the task safely, place an S in the appropriate column to indicate that the task was performed satisfactorily. An R indicates that, for some reason(s), the employee should be observed again at a later time. Use the comments space to record any observed unsafe practices, or any other information about the task(s) or the worker. To choose the task to observe, consider whether (1) it involves some new procedures because of a recent JSA revision, (2) there has been a change in equipment or machinery, (3) it poses an exceptional hazard, or (4) it is a job infrequently done but is complex. A U indicates unsatisfactory performance at a particular task and corrective action is required. 

The Report of thorough examination must be on a prescribed form. Where the machine has a defect and cannot continue to be used with safety, then a copy of the report must be sent to the Health and Safety Executive within 28 days. Under the Lifting Machines (Particulars of Examinations) Order 1963, reports must contain information such as the identification mark, safe working load, particulars of defects, observations, name of the competent person and the date of examination. The Docks Regulations also stipulate... 

The process of behavior observation and feedback provides leadership with a new kind of safety data namely, information about the day-to-day level of exposure to hazards in the working interface. This new information is proactive and points to specific systems and cultural issues that impede safe performance. By responding effectively to this information, leadership reinforces the value of safety in the organization s culture, directly and materially improves organizational safety, and sustains the mechanisms and systems that continuously drive safety improvement. 

Use this form to submit either safety improvement input and/or a BBS Safety Observation. Your name is optional and the name of the person being observed is not to be used. This information will be used to continually improve our safety system and conditions. 

Pha.rma.ceutica.1 Purity. A safety profile of a generic dmg can differ from that of the brand-name product because different impurities may be present in each of the dmgs (154). Impurities can arise out of the manufacturing processes and may be responsible for adverse interactions that can occur. Eor example, serious adverse reactions (LyeU syndrome) were observed upon the use of isoxicam in 1985. These seemed to have resulted from trace elements of a manufacturing by-product that was within the manufacturing quaUty control specifications. 

The HF tester is a commercial safety tool for sensing whether an unidentified liquid contains HF [2], It shows in an exemplary way how the electrochemical properties of a silicon electrode, namely its I-V curve in HF, can be applied for sensing. The ability to dissolve an anodic oxide layer formed on silicon electrodes in aqueous electrolytes under anodic bias is a unique property of HF. HF is therefore the only electrolyte in which considerable, steady-state anodic currents are observed, as shown schematically in Fig. 3.1. This effect has been exploited to realize a simple but effective safety sensor, which allows us to check within seconds if a liquid contains HF. This is useful for safety applications, because HF constitutes a major health hazard in semiconductor manufacturing, as discussed in Section 1.2. 

Thalidomide was a sedative and a h)rpnotic that first went on sale in 1956 in West Germany. Between 1958 and 1960, it was introduced in 46 countries under 51 different trade names. It was first introduced in the UK market in April 1958 under the name Distaval. It enjoyed good sales because of its prompt action, lack of hangover and addiction observed with barbiturates, and apparent safety. 

Nonel. Trade name of a new non-electric device for the firing of expl charges. The basic unit consists of, in place of electrical lines, safety fuses or detonating cord, a plastic hose (3mm diam) the inner wall of which is coated with a thin layer of expl. A shock wave initiated by a special initiator passes thru the hose with a speed of approx 2000m/sec. A spectator observes this shock wave process as a flash in the hose, which is not destroyed by the shock wave In order to initiate a charge, the Nonel line must be combined with a conventional detonator, and branching is possible... 

The 1994 report of the Institute of Medicine concluded that the evidence was inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation between MMR and encephalopathy, and it is known that the incidence of encephalitis after measles immunization of healthy children tends to be lower than the observed incidence of encephalitis of unknown cause. Two large studies have been negative. In a study analogous to the British Childhood Encephalopathy Study there were no increased risks of either encephalopathy or neurological sequelae after measles immunization (19). A retrospective case-control study through the CDC Vaccine Safety DataUnk assessing the risk for 300 000 doses of MMR found not a single case of encephalitis/ encephalopathy within 30 days of the administration of MMR (20). In contrast, the review mentioned above (18) reported an association between measles vaccine and encephalopathy. However, the conclusion of the report of the Institute of Medicine is still valid, namely that evidence is stiU inadequate to accept or reject a causal relation between measles vaccine and these diseases. 

Moreover, it can be observed that numerous mutual dependencies (e.g., between EquipmentSpecification and PID) as well as circular dependencies (e.g., between classes LineList, InstrumentSpecification, and SafetyValveSpecification) exist between the document classes. Usually, such dependencies arise if several versions or revisions of the documents are created during project execution. For instance, in the case of the mentioned circular dependencies, a first version of the LineList is created, based on which the InstrumentSpecification can be developed. The SafetyValveSpecification in turn requires some input from the InstrumentSpecification (namely the sizing information of the control valves). The SafetyValveSpecification, however, has an impact on the LineList, as all piping connected to a safety valve has to be sized according to the specified relief rates, such that a second version of the LineList needs to be established. 

The National Occupation Hazard Survey (NOHS), conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), estimated that 108,682 workers in 15,127 plants were potentially exposed to selenium in the workplace in 1970 (NOHS 1976). These estimates were derived from observations of the actual use of selenium (1% of total estimate), the use of trade name products known to contain selenium... 

In preparing this book we have also been reliant on the aid of a substmitial number of persons in each country in which our investigations have been undertaken. Representatives of trade unions, labour inspectorates, health and safety policy makers, employers organisations, researchers and observers were not only willhig subjects for interview but often played a key role establishing fiirther contacts with important informants in each country. Although these people are too numerous to mention by name, the authors would like to acknowledge their debt to their active co-operation and help. Without it, this book would not have been possible. 

It exhibits a profile of pharmacological action very much identical to morphine, and differs exceptionally on two accounts, namely flrst-it does not cause emesis secondly, it does not release histamine. Its safety measure in frequency cases has not yet been fully understood. It is observed to cross the placental barrier therefore, its usage during labour may ultimately give rise to respiratory depression in the newly bom infant. However, Fentanyl s transient action after the parenteral administration is caused solely on account of redistribution, rather than to "metabolism" or "excretion". Hence, longer usage of this drug may cause in accumulation and toxicities. 

For nongenotoxic chemicals, risk assessment is based on the concept of threshold doses, below which no adverse effect results from exposure. From human or experimental animal data, one tries to establish the no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) and the lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL). In order to establish safe levels of exposure to potentially toxic agents, the NOAEL is divided by a safety factor (often named uncertainty factor). When the risk assessment is based on data from experimental animals, a default safety factor of 100 is usually applied. The safety factor constitutes a factor of 10 for potential differences in susceptibility between animals and man, and another factor of 10 for interindividual differences among humans. The factors are combinations of differences in toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics, both in animals and man. If true factors are known, the size of the safety factor may be changed accordingly. When risk assessment is based on human data, a safety factor of 10 is applied in most cases, for instance, for food additives. However, for natural toxins in food, smaller factors are usually applied. This is a risk management decision, often based on information on the absence of adverse health effects at intake levels close to the estimated LOAELs. 

In the United States in 1960, Richardson-Merrell sought marketing approval for thalidomide under the brand name Kevadon. It never reached the market because of the resistance of an FDA medical reviewer. Dr. Francis Kelsey. It is said that she was influenced by her previous experience with the antimalarial drug quinidine, which had teratogenic activity. Her misgivings were based on concerns that peripheral neuritis had been observed in adults. This mixture of concern about safety and previous experience combined to overrule the considerable body of preclinical evidence that the drug was safe. Kelsey... 

Another common factual defense is the isolated incident defense. This defense is exactly what the title implies, namely, the employer possesses an adequate safety and health program and the alleged violation observed by the compliance officer was an isolated incident that is out of the norm of the safety and heath program and efforts of the employer. Safety professionals should be aware that in order to establish this defense, documentation and other supporting evidence must demonstrate the following ... 

A modification of The Critical Incident Technique was published by the Division of Safety, Standards, and Compliance of the United States Energy Research and Development Administration in 1976. Because the method was also to be applied in the nuclear industry, where the terms Critical and Incident have their own connotations, a new name was used Reported Significant Observation (RSO) Studies. In a paper with that title, it is said that RSO was formally recognized as a significant hazard reduction tool. ... 

---