Precision sensitivity

Designing an experimental procedure involves selecting an appropriate method of analysis based on established criteria, such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and detection limit the urgency with which results are needed the cost of a single analysis the number of samples to be analyzed and the amount of sample available for... 

The requirements of the analysis determine the best method. In choosing a method, consideration is given to some or all the following design criteria accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, robustness, ruggedness, scale of operation, analysis time, availability of equipment, and cost. Each of these criteria is considered in more detail in the following sections. 

The scale of operations, accuracy, precision, sensitivity, time, and cost of methods involving redox titrations are similar to those described earlier in the chapter for acid-base and complexometric titrimetric methods. As with acid-base titrations, redox titrations can be extended to the analysis of mixtures if there is a significant difference in the ease with which the analytes can be oxidized or reduced. Figure 9.40 shows an example of the titration curve for a mixture of Fe + and Sn +, using Ce + as the titrant. The titration of a mixture of analytes whose standard-state potentials or formal potentials differ by at least 200 mV will result in a separate equivalence point for each analyte. 

Use of 10 pm LiChrosorb RP18 column and binary eluent of methanol and aqueous 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 4.0) according to suitable gradient elution program in less than 20-min run time with satisfactory precision sensitivity of spectrophotometric detection optimized, achieving for all additives considered detection limits ranging from 0.1 to 3.0 mg/1, below maximum permitted levels Simultaneous separation (20 min) of 14 synthetic colors using uncoated fused silica capillary column operated at 25 kV and elution with 18% acetonitrile and 82% 0.05 M sodium deoxycholate in borate-phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), recovery of all colors better than 82%... 

Determination of appropriate measuring and analysis methods. Decisions must be made on the selection of appropriate and available measuring and or analytical equipment and tools. The characteristics of the methods must be discussed in terms of specificity, accuracy, precision, sensitivity of the methods, and locations of measuring and/or sampling (off-line, at-line, on-line, in-line, non-invasive). 

Accuracy, specificity, precision, sensitivity, velocity, ease of use ... 

Once the determinative or confirmatory method has been developed to take full advantage of the chemical properties of the analyte molecule, a study is necessary to prove that the method is valid. Criteria for method validation are outlined in guidelines from the US FDA, US EPA, and EU. A summary of the differences in regulatory requirements for method validation is provided in Table 3. The parameters addressed by all of the regulatory guidelines include accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and practicability. 

The establishment of performance criteria for a given tumor marker test is not a simple process because accuracy and precision are unique for each type of analyte and its application. Establishing methodological limits for accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity often requires standard reference materials, quality control materials, comparative studies, and actual clinical specimens. Accuracy and precision must be measured over the analyte reportable range for which the device is intended to be used. Sensitivity and specificity must be considered with respect to the intended clinical use of the device. Also, the indications for use should be carefully considered in the design of the study protocol. The indications for class II should be to monitor residual tumor after surgery (or radiation), the recurrence of tumor, or response to therapy. A 510(k) must provide clear evidence that the device is accurate, safe, effective, and substantially equivalent to a device legally marketed in the United States. 

Analytical methods, particularly those used by accredited laboratories, have to be validated according to official rules and regulations to characterize objectively their reliability in any special field of application (Wegscheider [1996] EURACHEM/WELAC [1993]). Validation has to control the performance characteristics of analytical procedures (see Chap. 7) such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, robustness, ruggedness, and limit values (e.g., limit of detection, limit of quantitation). 

A calibration procedure has to be validated with regard to general and specific requirements under which the calibration model has been developed. For this purpose, it is important to test whether the conditions represented in Fig. 6.6 are fulfilled. On the other hand, it is to assure by experimental studies that certain performance features (accuracy, precision, sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, linearity, working range, limits of detection and of quantification, robustness, and ruggedness, see Chap. 7) fulfil the expected requirements. 

High-performance instruments and measurements of unprecedented precision, sensitivity, spatial resolution, or specificity ... 

Electron probe microanalysis functions by direct examination of the primary X-rays produced when the specimen is used as a target for an electron beam. Focused electron beams allow a spot analysis of a 1 pm3 section of the specimen. One current development employs the electron beam within a scanning electron microscope to provide both a visual picture of the surface of the sample and an elemental analysis of the section being viewed. Spectra obtained from primary X-rays always have the characteristic emission peaks superimposed on a continuum of background radiation (Figure 8.32). This feature limits the precision, sensitivity and resolution of electron probe microanalysis. 

Clinical studies Analytical Phase 1 for determination of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity Analytical and clinical Phase II for determination of usual range of results encountered in healthy subjects or comparing results in various disease states Phase III to establish the actual medical usefulness of a test in a realistic clinical setting Phases I—III completed before 510(k) clearance or PMA approval... 

Reliable quality control in the field of pharmaceutical analysis is based on the use of valid analytical methods. For this reason, any analytical procedures proposed for a particular active pharmaceutical ingredient and its corresponding dosage forms shonld be validated to demonstrate that they are scientifically sonnd nnder the experimental conditions intended to be used. Since dissolntion data reflect drng prod-net stability and quality, the HPLC method used in snch tests shonld be validated in terms of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, rngged-ness, and robustness as per ICH guidelines. 

Key words HRTEM, STEM, resolution, precision, sensitivity, single atom detection. 

On the other hand, its should be emphasized that such basic analytical properties as precision, sensitivity and selectivity are influenced by the kinetic connotations of the sensor. Measurement repeatability and reproducibility depend largely on constancy of the hydrodynamic properties of the continuous system used and on whether or not the chemical and separation processes involved reach complete equilibrium (otherwise, measurements made under unstable conditions may result in substantial errors). Reaction rate measurements boost selectivity as they provide differential (incremental) rather than absolute values, so any interferences from the sample matrix are considerably reduced. Because flow-through sensors enable simultaneous concentration and detection, they can be used to develop kinetic methodologies based on the slope of the initial portion of the transient signal, thereby indirectly increasing the sensitivity without the need for the large sample volumes typically used by classical preconcentration methods. 

This, however, is clearly not the only reason for such a problem nor is it the only reason for the inordinately tedious and involved procedures which are often reported and recommended. It is also true that if trace components can be of concern in a sample, then trace components can also be of concern in all the items involved in processing that sample. Thus "other traces" are not necessarily introduced into the system in the same quantity as the sought components. In many cases, they can be expected to exceed that quantity many-fold. As a consequence the sample, as finally prepared for measurement, can almost never be considered as a single, pure component suspended in a single pure matrix. It must still be a highly complex mixture. Were this not so, the elegance of instrumentation and technical training would be a considerable waste since the only need, under those circumstances, would be a precisely sensitive and accurate balance. 

Accurate, precise, sensitive, and rapid analytical determinations are as essential in food science and technology as in chemistry, biochemistry, and other physical and biological sciences. In many cases, the same methodologies are used. How does one, especially a young scientist, select the best methods to use A review of original publications in a given field indicates that some methods are cited repeatedly by many noted researchers and analysts, but with some modifications adapting them to the specific material analyzed. Official analytical methods have been adopted by some professional societies, such as the Official Methods of Analysis (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), Official Methods and Recommendation Practices (American Oil Chemists Society), and Official Methods of Analysis (American Association of Cereal Chemists). 

Silicon microcantilever sensors that can be mass-produced using currently available microfabrication techniques, however, have the potential to satisfy the conditions of sensitivity, miniature size, low power consumption, and real-time operation [2], Microcantilevers are generally micromachined from silicon wafers using conventional techniques. Typical dimensions of a micromachined cantilever are 100 p,m in length, 40 p,m in width, and 1 xm in thickness. The primary advantage of a cantilever beam originates from its ability to sensitively measure displacements with sub-nanometer precision. Sensitive detection of displacement leads to sensitive detection of forces and stresses. 

---