Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Procedures levels

In the ideal case the target level procedure for industrial ventilation can be compared with materials selection. Somebody who wants steel AISl 316, for instance, just selects and buys it by specifying this standard. The person will obtain steel with the desired properties, because the steel is made according to the producer s quality requirements and the producer guarantees its quality. [Pg.358]

The tai et level concept was introduced and developed by the Association of Finnish Manufacturers of Air Handling Equipment (AFMAHE) in 1985. - Indoor climate target levels have been utilized in the ventilation of public buildings, apartments, and offices for years.The Finnish Institute of Occupational Health began to develop the concept for industrial ventilation in 1991.Tf The target level procedure for industrial air quality is described in more detail in Section 6.4. [Pg.359]

The target level procedure was applied to 16 common air contaminants (Table 6.19). These are common contaminants in the industrial environment, and in many cases are the most critical compounds from the viewpoint of need for control measures. The prevailing concentration data as well as the benchmark levels were taken from Nordic databases, mainly the Finnish sources, and described elsewhere.In addition, a general model for assessing target values for other contaminants is presented in the table. [Pg.402]

RSEs for a broader selection of substituted methyl radicals, as well as MADs and MDs from experiment and CBS-RAD values, are presented in Tables 6.12 and 6.13. We noted in the previous section that our highest-level procedure, namely Wl, gives accurate BDEs, and this observation carries over to the RSEs calculated at this level. The MAD from experiment for the Wl method is 3.1 kJ/mol. The Wl RSEs tend to be slightly lower than those determined from experimental data [MD(Exp.) of -2.2 kJ/mol]. [Pg.178]

The barriers for this reaction calculated for a range of higher-level procedures (Table 6.22) [49] show that the CBS methods agree well with experiment while their G2 counterparts generally overestimate the... [Pg.188]

An assurance that the physical hardware, software, and the regulated electronic records are maintained in a secure environment is critical to the validated status of a computer system, particularly if it is an enterprise level system. Security must be instituted at several levels. Procedural controls must govern the physical access to computer systems (physical security). The access to individual computer system platforms is controlled by network specific security procedures (network security). Finally, application level security and associated authority checks control access to the computer system applications (applications security). [Pg.106]

For example, ASTM has described a two-level procedure for checking the performance of an FUR spectrometer (74). The routine check of instrument performance, a so-called Zero-level test, includes the following tasks ... [Pg.380]

Patterns of exposure can be described using models that combine abiotic ecosystem attributes, stressor properties, and ecological component characteristics. Model selection is based on the model s suitability for the ecosystem or component of interest, the availability of the requisite data, and the study objectives. Model choices range from simple, screening-level procedures that require a minimum of data to more sophisticated methods that describe processes in more detail but require a considerable amount of data. [Pg.449]

A 2 -f 3-body MP2-level procedure was used to characterize the (H20)6 cluster at T = 220 K. These results were used in a histogram procedure to predict the potential... [Pg.1005]

In a simple view, both heavy and light fluorous molecules can be divided into an organic domain that controls the reaction chemistry and a fluorous domain that controls the separation chemistry. This view coincides with the principles of strategy level separations, which dictate that reactions should be purified only by simple workup-level procedures whenever possible. In the ideal separation, the target products of a reaction partitions into a phase that is different from all of the other reaction components, thereby allowing rapid and in many cases environment friendly isolation. The fluorous ponytails (permanent domains) or tags (temporary domains) on both heavy and light fluorous molecules allow them to partition into a fluorous phase under suitable workup conditions. [Pg.104]

Mission and activity models describe in a hierarchic structure the goals and the available recovery activities from missions-not-as-planned that make up the human operators high-level behavioral repertoire in the mission. The next level of decomposition of the action of the mission is a set of high-level procedures (that can be stored as a fairly generic set of routines, e.g., look at or fixate). Finally, there are the specific activities in active action packets RAPS, which are the process by which the human operator affects the simulation. [Pg.2433]

PROCSPEC is an IL representation of the interface and behaviour of an analysed procedure, and is used in the Malpas analysis of higher-level procedures. When an analysis subtask is completed, it is subjected to review. Once the analysis is judged satisfactory and approved, any PROCSPECs are released for use in subsequent analyses. [Pg.94]

It is not always clear as to how much detail should be provided. Many writers of operating procedures do not know how much detail to provide. Instmctions can range all the way from high-level procedures such as, Fill the Tank, all the way to detailed valve-by-valve and step-by-step instmctions. [Pg.329]

Important to all of this is a written document that states the company s policy on this subject and includes details such as the minimum credentials that must met to be eligible to drive (legal, experience, and acceptable risk levels) procedures for ongoing aedentialing reviews unacceptable infractions (regulatory and employer policy) that result in immediate removal from driving duties new hire and tenured driver safety training protocols and remediation for increased risk level assessments. [Pg.32]

The third contribution of IDEFO is based on the decomposition structure of IDEFO. IDEFO allows the decomposition of process into various hierarchical detailed levels. This feature makes IDEFO an ideal technique for modeling processes based on the SCOR four-level procedure. [Pg.14]

Task analysis outputs may serve a variety of system inputs. For example, task analysis may be used to obtain detailed information on a given work position, thereby providing data for selection, training, staffing level, procedure development and retrofit, communications, equipment review, feedback, supervisory control, and risk screening. [Pg.42]

The discussed results confirm the potential and beneficial effects of iodine-azide reaction as a detection system in planar chromatography. The proposed detection system allows selective and sensitive detection for thiol or thione at picomol per spot level (procedures 3 and 4). The other detection methods routinely used in TLC—iodine vapor, UV—gave a positive but less sensitive test. Iodine-azide detection system is inexpensive the reagents are readily available chemicals and the analysis times are short. The non-improved iodine-azide method (procedures 1 and 2) has not been widely applied on account of the relatively high detection limits obtained with the procedure. [Pg.1232]

However, if there is a failure or the equipment shuts down from an unsafe condition, there may be a second-level procedure. It may require a supervisor with advanced knowledge to evaluate and concur in the problem. In addition, after completing repairs the repairmen and supervisor must approve the work. Then the equipment can return to full operation. [Pg.451]

A major failure or shutdown may require a third-level procedure. Such an event may need specialists to diagnose the problem. Later, the specialist may need to approve repairs and assure that everything is safe. Then the process can begin again. [Pg.451]

The second and third-level procedures may require special tests and testing equipment, rather than observation alone. The additional participants will bring additional knowledge and experience to the problem. They may also bring specialized safety knowledge important for returning to full operation. [Pg.451]

Tbe site emergency management A division level procedure for emergenq... [Pg.253]

In the Wn methods, high level CCSD(T) calculations are extrapolated to the infinite basis set limit using the extrapolation routine of Martin and Parthiban (28). Additional corrections are included for scalar relativistic effects, core-correlation, and spin-orbit coupling in atoms. No additional empirical corrections are included in this method. The Wn methods are very high level procedures, and have been demonstrated to display chemical accuracy. For example, the W1 procedure was foimd to have a mean absolute deviation from experiment of only 2.5 kJ mol for the heats of formation of 55 stable molecules. For the (more expensive) W2 theory, the corresponding deviation was less than 1 kJ mol . ... [Pg.1731]

Geometry optimizations are relatively insensitive to the level of theory however, there are some important exceptions. In particular, the HF and MP2 methods should be avoided for spin-contaminated systems (99). Moreover, the B3-LYP method does not describe the transition structnres very well for a nnmher of hydrogen abstraction reactions (59,97). However, improved performance is obtained using newer hybrid DFT methods such as MPWIK (59) and KMLYP (97), and these methods are suitable as low cost methods, when high level procedures cannot be afforded. [Pg.1750]

Standards such as RTCA DO-178B include the recommendation (depending on criticality level) to trace all code to requirements. In the absence of dynamic binding, this is relatively straightforward to achieve. Each procedure at the outermost layer of the software is typically present to support directly a stated functional requirement. Static analysis of the program can identify all lower-level procedures that are directly or indirectly called from the outermost procedures. Thus a lattice can be generated in which every procedure is directly or indirectly linked to one or more functional requirements. [Pg.34]

This template has been successfully used by companies in die safety systems integration field and in consultancy firms. It consists of a top-level procedure and eight work practices to cover details of safety assessment (see Annex 1). [Pg.263]

Principles and Characteristics Whereas parameters most relevant to method development are considered to be accuracy, system precision, linearity, range, LOD, LOQ, sensitivity and robustness, method validation parameters are mainly bias, specificity, recovery (and stability of the analyte), repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility and ruggedness. However, method development and validation are highly related. Also, validation characteristics are not independent they influence each other. Acceptance criteria for validation parameters should be based on the specification limits of the test procedure. Quantitation and detection limits need a statement of the precision at their concentration levels. Procedures used for validation of qualitative methods are generally less involved than those for quantitative analytical methods. According to Riley [82], who has discussed the various parameters for validation of quantitative analytical methods, the primary statistical parameters that validate an analytical method are accuracy and precision. [Pg.751]

CC calculations do provide a safe means for navigating between the Scylla of UHF spin contamination and the Charybdis of ROHF symmetry breaking for radicals. Cost is the main disadvantage of CC calculations. If performed with large polarized basis sets of the type required to obtain results of chemical accuracy, CCSD(T) and even CCSD calculations rapidly become prohibitively expensive as the size of the molecules on which they are performed increases. When they cannot be applied directly to the molecules under study, CC calculations on smaller model systems can sometimes be employed to validate the use of lower level procedures on the actual molecules of interest. This protocol has, in fact, proven useful in several recent studies. ... [Pg.40]


See other pages where Procedures levels is mentioned: [Pg.1763]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.1523]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.1767]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.1748]    [Pg.2373]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.254]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.78 ]




SEARCH



Predisposing Factors Level 3 - Codes, Rules and Procedures

© 2024 chempedia.info