Screening level

Screening Level or Screening Level Value (SLV) the concentration or dose of air pollution below which estimated impacts from proposed new or modified sources are considered insignificant. The SLV is dependent on existing air quality and on the condition of the AQRV of concern. 

These substance-specific estimates, which are intended to serve as screening levels, are used by ATSDR health assessors to identify contaminants and potential health effects that may be of concern at hazardous waste sites. It is important to note that MRLs are not intended to define clean-up or action levels. 

Duvall SE, Barron MG. 2000. A screening level probabilistic risk assessment of mercury in Florida Everglades food webs. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 47 298-305. 

The final emission standard under the BIF regulations limits the unit s output of HCI and chlorine gas (Cl j). These compounds combine with water in the air to form acid rain. They are also a known cause of human respiratory problems. The emission controls are implemented in the same way as the metal emissions, using the tiered approach. The owner/operator has a choice of three tiers with varying focal points. The Tier I and Tier II screening levels for waste feed and stack emission limits are located in Part 266, Appendices II and III.5... 

Zone 1 Counties that have a predicted average indoor radon screening level greater than 4pCi/L (picocuries per liter)—the highest potential. 

Table I. CURRENT EXTENT OF FIELD TESTING FOR SCREENING LEVEL MODELS (3) 100 = Model thoroughly field tested 0 = Model not tested...

As it has been shown in this chapter knowing the concentrations of chemicals in the environment is a key aspect in order to carry out meaningful hazard and risk assessment studies. Predicting concentrations of chemicals can serve as a quick and robust way to produce an acceptable screening level assessment however if further precision is desired, the complexity of real environmental scenarios can make it a cumbersome and unaffordable task. Models improvement requires not only refining their computation algorithms but also and more important, implementing new inputs and processes in order to better describe real scenarios. 

In order to achieve that an environmental fate model is successfully applied in a screening level risk assessment and ultimately incorporated into the decisionmaking tools, the model should have computational efficiency and modest data input. Moreover, the model should incorporate all relevant compartments and all sources of contamination and should consider the most important mechanisms of fate and transport. Although spatial models describe the environment more accurately, such models are difficult to apply because they require a large amount of input data (e.g., detailed terrain parameters, meteorological data, turbulence characteristics and other related parameters). Therefore, MCMs are more practical, especially for long-term environmental impact evaluation, because of their modest data requirements and relatively simple yet comprehensive model structure. In addition, MCMs are also widely used for the comparative risk assessment of new and existing chemicals [28-33]. 

Cohen Y, Tsai W, Chetty SL, Mayer GJ (1990) Dynamic partitioning of organic chemicals in regional environments a multimedia screening-level modeling approach. Environ Sci Technol 24 1549-1558... 

United States Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Protocol (SLERAP) for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities EPA 530-D-99-001A. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC... 

Assessment of Exposure-Response Functions for Rocket-Emission Toxicants (1998) Review of a Screening Level Risk Assessment for the Naval Air Facility at Atsugi, Japan (Letter Report) (1998)... 

While clear rules apply to the acceptance criteria for GLP assays,12,14 15 114 little agreement surrounds what should be included in the acceptance criteria for discovery PK (non-GLP) assays. Korfmacher16 published a set of rules for discovery PK assays based on the simple concept that the rules should become more rigorous as one moves from early PK screening (Level I) of many compounds to rapid PK studies for lead compounds (Lead Optimization—Level II), and finally special PK studies for compounds that are likely to be recommended for development (Lead Qualification—Level III). 

An MRL is an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified duration of exposure. MRLs are based on noncancer health effects only and are not based on a consideration of cancer effects. These substance-specific estimates, which are intended to serve as screening levels, are used by ATSDR health assessors to identify contaminants and potential health effects that may be of concern at hazardous waste sites. It is important to note that MRLs are not intended to define clean-up or action levels. 

EPA Permissible Remediation Guidelines, Risk Based Screening Levels, 1998. 

Most of the test methods used to assess the anaerobic biodegradability of organic chemicals have been screening level tests based upon measuring the increase in gas volume or pressure resulting from the conversion of a test material to carbon dioxide (C02) and methane (CH4), such as the ECETOC-28 test [3,4],... 

Recalculation of Screening Level Concentrations for Nonpolar Organic Contaminants in Marine Sediments [Final Report]... 

Zhao JL, Ying GG, Liu YS, Chen F, Yang JF, Wang L, Yang XB, Stauber JL, Wame MSt J (2010) Occurrence and screening level risk assessment of human pharmaceutical in the Pearl River system, South China. Environ Toxicol Chem 29 1377-1384... 

---