Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction forces

The Hamiltonian considered above, which connmites with E, involves the electromagnetic forces between the nuclei and electrons. However, there is another force between particles, the weak interaction force, that is not invariant to inversion. The weak charged current mteraction force is responsible for the beta decay of nuclei, and the related weak neutral current interaction force has an effect in atomic and molecular systems. If we include this force between the nuclei and electrons in the molecular Hamiltonian (as we should because of electroweak unification) then the Hamiltonian will not conuuiite with , and states of opposite parity will be mixed. However, the effect of the weak neutral current interaction force is mcredibly small (and it is a very short range force), although its effect has been detected in extremely precise experiments on atoms (see, for... [Pg.170]

Gotsmann B, Anczykowski B, Seidel C and Fuchs H 1999 Determination of tip-sample interaction forces from measured dynamic force spectroscopy curves Appl. Surf. Sc/. 140 314... [Pg.1724]

Durig U, Zuger O and Staider A 1992 interaction force detection in scanning probe microscopy methods and appiications J. Appl. Phys. 72 1778... [Pg.1725]

Li Y Q, Tao N J, Pan J, Garcia A A and Lindsay S M 1993 Direct measurement of interaction forces between colloidal particles using the scanning force microscope Langmuir 9 637... [Pg.1728]

Chowdhury P B and Luckham P F 1995 Interaction forces between kappa-casein adsorbed on mica Colloids Surfaces B 4 327-34... [Pg.1749]

Kuhl T Let al 1994 Modulation of interaction forces between bilayers exposing short-chained ethylene oxide headgroups Biophys. J. 66 1479-88... [Pg.1749]

The structure of the section is as follows. In Section 2.8.2 we give necessary definitions and construct a Borel measure n which describes the work of the interaction forces, i.e. for a set A c F dr, the value /a(A) characterizes the forces at the set A. The next step is a proof of smoothness of the solution provided the exterior data are regular. In particular, we prove that horizontal displacements W belong to in a neighbourhood of the crack faces. Consequently, the components of the strain and stress tensors belong to the space In this case the measure n is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. This confirms the existence of a locally integrable function q called a density of the measure n such that... [Pg.140]

The nonpenetration condition considered in this section leads to new effects such as the appearance of interaction forces between crack faces. It is of interest to establish the highest regularity of the solution up to the crack faces and thus to analyse the smoothness of the interaction forces. The regularity of the solution stated in this section entails the components of the strain and stress tensors to belong to in the vicinity of the crack and the interaction forces to belong to T. If the crack shape is not regular, i.e. 0 1), the interaction forces can be characterized by the nonnegative... [Pg.148]

In this subsection we construct a nonnegative measure characterizing the work of interacting forces. The measure is defined on the Borel subsets of I. The space of continuous functions defined on I with compact supports is denoted by Co(I). [Pg.355]

B measure of solute—membrane pore waU interaction force l ... [Pg.156]

The interaction forces which account for the value of a in this equation arise from tire size, the molecular vibration frequencies and dipole moments of the molecules. The factor b is only related to the molecular volumes. The molar volume of a gas at one atmosphere pressure is 22.414 ImoD at 273 K, and this volume increases according to Gay-Lussac s law with increasing... [Pg.112]

When a gas comes in contact with a solid surface, under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure, the concentration of the gas (the adsorbate) is always found to be greater near the surface (the adsorbent) than in the bulk of the gas phase. This process is known as adsorption. In all solids, the surface atoms are influenced by unbalanced attractive forces normal to the surface plane adsorption of gas molecules at the interface partially restores the balance of forces. Adsorption is spontaneous and is accompanied by a decrease in the free energy of the system. In the gas phase the adsorbate has three degrees of freedom in the adsorbed phase it has only two. This decrease in entropy means that the adsorption process is always exothermic. Adsorption may be either physical or chemical in nature. In the former, the process is dominated by molecular interaction forces, e.g., van der Waals and dispersion forces. The formation of the physically adsorbed layer is analogous to the condensation of a vapor into a liquid in fret, the heat of adsorption for this process is similar to that of liquefoction. [Pg.736]

The thermodynamic dead volume would be that of a small molecule that could enter the pores but not be retained by differential interactive forces. The maximum retention volume was recorded for methanol and water which, for concentrations of methanol above 10%v/v, would be equivalent to the thermodynamic dead volume for small molecules viz, about 2.8 ml). It is interesting to note that there is no significant difference between the retention volume of water and that of methanol over the complete range of solvent compositions examined, which confirms the validity of this... [Pg.41]

The distribution coefficient is an equilibrium constant and, therefore, is subject to the usual thermodynamic treatment of equilibrium systems. By expressing the distribution coefficient in terms of the standard free energy of solute exchange between the phases, the nature of the distribution can be understood and the influence of temperature on the coefficient revealed. However, the distribution of a solute between two phases can also be considered at the molecular level. It is clear that if a solute is distributed more extensively in one phase than the other, then the interactive forces that occur between the solute molecules and the molecules of that phase will be greater than the complementary forces between the solute molecules and those of the other phase. Thus, distribution can be considered to be as a result of differential molecular forces and the magnitude and nature of those intermolecular forces will determine the magnitude of the respective distribution coefficients. Both these explanations of solute distribution will be considered in this chapter, but the classical thermodynamic explanation of distribution will be treated first. [Pg.47]

There are two ways a solute can interact with a stationary phase surface. The solute molecule can interact with the adsorbed solvent layer and rest on the top of it. This is called sorption interaction and occurs when the molecular forces between the solute and the stationary phase are relatively weak compared with the forces between the solvent molecules and the stationary phase. The second type is where the solute molecules displace the solvent molecules from the surface and interact directly with the stationary phase itself. This is called displacement interaction and occurs when the interactive forces between the solute molecules and the stationary phase surface are much stronger than those between the solvent molecules and the stationary phase surface. An example of sorption interaction is shown in Figure 9. [Pg.99]

In a force-displacement curve, the tip and sample surfaces are brought close to one another, and interact via an attractive potential. This potential is governed by intermolecular and surface forces [18] and contains both attractive and repulsive terms. How well the shape of the measured force-displacement curve reproduces the true potential depends largely on the cantilever spring constant and tip radius. If the spring constant is very low (typical), the tip will experience a mechanical instability when the interaction force gradient (dF/dD) exceeds the... [Pg.195]

Tamayo, J. and Garcia, R., Relationship between phase shift and energy dissipation in tapping-mode scanning force microscopy. Appl Phys. Lett., 73(20), 2926-2928 (1998). Gotsmann, B., Seidel, C., Anezykowski, B. and Fuchs, H., Conservative and dissipative tip-sample interaction forces probed with dynamic AFM. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter, 60, 11051-11061 (1999). [Pg.217]

Due to the very low volumetric concentration of the dispersed particles involved in the fluid flow for most cyclones, the presence of the particles does not have a significant effect on the fluid flow itself. In these circumstances, the fluid and the particle flows may be considered separately in the numerical simulation. A common approach is to first solve the fluid flow equations without considering the presence of particles, and then simulate the particle flow based on the solution of the fluid flow to compute the drag and other interactive forces that act on the particles. [Pg.1208]

There has been much discussion of the relative contributions of the no-bond and dative structures to the strength of the CT complex. For most CT complexes, even those exhibiting intense CT absorption bands, the dative contribution to the complex stability appears to be minor, and the interaction forces are predominantly the noncovalent ones. However, the readily observed absorption effect is an indication of the CT phenomenon. It should be noted, however, that electronic absorption shifts are possible, even likely, consequences of intermolecular interaetions of any type, and their characterization as CT bands must be based on the nature of the spectrum and the structures of the interaetants. This subject is dealt with in books on CT complexes. ... [Pg.394]

In a fundamental sense, the miscibility, adhesion, interfacial energies, and morphology developed are all thermodynamically interrelated in a complex way to the interaction forces between the polymers. Miscibility of a polymer blend containing two polymers depends on the mutual solubility of the polymeric components. The blend is termed compatible when the solubility parameter of the two components are close to each other and show a single-phase transition temperature. However, most polymer pairs tend to be immiscible due to differences in their viscoelastic properties, surface-tensions, and intermolecular interactions. According to the terminology, the polymer pairs are incompatible and show separate glass transitions. For many purposes, miscibility in polymer blends is neither required nor de-... [Pg.649]

The solid plates that resulted from the cooling process at the surface of the eanli were able to float on the remaining molten inner portion of the earth. Because of the rotational motion of the earth about its own axis and the earth s motion in the solar system, inertial and gravitational forces have produced great interactive forces between the plates. It is speculated that these interactive forces have led to plate contact and situations where one plate has slid over another. The great forces created by plate tectonics are likely responsible for the forces that have resulted in the folding and faulting of the earth s crust [30j. [Pg.247]

Unfortunately, the requirements cannot be fulfilled by a single salt, because they are partially contradicting. For example, the last two requirements would be best fulfilled with simple halides such as LiF or LiCl. However, their solubility in every suitable solvent is low, due to their high lattice energies. In addition, these salts show strong ion-ion interaction forces, even in solvents of high permittivity. [Pg.461]

The aryl C—O—C linkage has a lower rotation barrier, lower excluded volume, and decreased van der Waals interaction forces compared to the C—C bond. Therefore, the backbone containing C—O—C linkage is highly flexible. In addition, the low barrier to rotation about the aromatic ether bond provides a mechanism for energy dispersion which is believed to be the principal reason for the toughness or impact resistance observed for these materials.15 17... [Pg.327]


See other pages where Interaction forces is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.1585]    [Pg.2819]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.1344]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.31]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.169 , Pg.194 , Pg.195 , Pg.219 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.288 , Pg.326 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.23 ]




SEARCH



Adsorption and interaction forces of reagents

Adsorption theory primary force interactions

Adsorption theory secondary force interactions

Applicability of Force Fields to Reproduce Ab Initio Noncovalent Interactions Involving Aromatic Groups

Attractive forces induced interactions

Attractive forces interactions

Biological interactions noncovalent forces

Bubble interactions drag force

Charge interaction force

Chromatography molecular interaction forces

Colloidal interactions repulsive steric forces

Colloidal particles, interaction force

Computational interaction forces

Contact interactions cohesive force

Contact interactions compressive force

Contact interactions force-distance curve

Contact interactions surface forces

Coulomb forces, long-range interactions

Coulomb interaction forces

Coulomb interaction/integral force fields

Coulombic electrostatic interaction forces

Coulombic, interaction forces

Depletion force /interaction

Determining Forces of Interaction Between Macroscopic Bodies

Dipol interaction forces

Dipolar Interactions London, Keesom, and Debye Forces

Dipole interactive forces

Direct Calculation of Interaction Force

Dispersion interaction forces

Dispersion interactive force

Dispersive interactions Waals forces

Dispersive interactions forces

Double-layer interaction, electrostatic force

Drug-receptor interactions, forces

Effects of Physical Forces on Cell-ECM Interactions

Electrostatic concepts, interaction forces

Electrostatic forces nonbonded interactions

Electrostatic interactions London forces

Electrostatic interactions force fields

Electrostatic interactions forces between charged surfaces

Electrostatic interactions intermolecular forces

Electrostatic interactions many-body forces

Electrostatic interactions/forces

Electrostatic interactions/forces colloids

Energies and Forces of Interaction

Evolution of concepts on long range molecular forces responsible for. organisation and interactions in colloidal systems

Fluid-bubble interaction force

Force analysis of diatomic interactions

Force and interaction stiffness curves

Force constants, interfacial interaction

Force fields interactions

Force fields protein-ligand interactions

Force fields torsion interactions

Force hydrodynamic interaction

Force hydrophobic interaction

Force of interaction

Forces and Interactions

Forces and Supramolecular Interactions

Forces interaction between particular point charge

Forces of interaction between colloidal particles

GRID force field interaction fields

Hydrogen bonding, 39 - Electrostatic interactions, 40 - Hydrophobicity, 44 - Dispersion forces

Hydrophobic Interactions (van der Waals Forces)

Interaction Energies (Forces) Between Emulsion Droplets and their Combinations

Interaction Energies and Forces

Interaction Force and Isodynamic Curves

Interaction Forces (Energies) Between Particles or Droplets Containing Adsorbed Non-ionic Surfactants and Polymers

Interaction Forces Between Aggregates

Interaction Forces Between Two Closely Spaced Drops

Interaction Forces Between Two Far-spaced Drops

Interaction Forces of Two Conducting Spherical Drops

Interaction force between particles

Interaction force constants

Interaction forces and their combination

Interaction forces between different

Interaction forces parameter

Interaction forces particle-fluid

Interaction forces potential

Interaction forces, between membrane

Interaction forces, between membrane surfaces

Interaction forces, colloid stability

Interaction forces, intermolecular

Interaction forces, polymer chain segments

Interactions fundamental forces

Interatomic interaction forces

Interatomic interaction forces Molecular interactions)

Interfacial interaction force constants determination

Intermolecular Forces in Protein-Ligand Interactions

Intermolecular forces Molecular interactions)

Intermolecular forces Relatively weak interactions that occur between molecules

Intermolecular forces noncovalent interactions

Intermolecular interaction force characteristic value

Intermolecular interaction forces,relative

Intermolecular interaction forces,relative strengths

Intramolecular forces Interactions that

Intramolecular forces interactions that occur

Intramolecular forces long-range interaction

Intramolecular interaction forces

London dispersion force interaction

London interaction forces

Long-range interactions, computation forces

Membrane surface, interaction forces

Molecular and Electrostatic Interaction Forces Acting on Drops

Molecular interaction forces

Molecular interactions Born repulsive forces

Nanoelements interaction forces

Net interaction force

Nominal interaction forces

PHYSICAL FORCES AND MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS

Particle interaction forces

Particle interactions intermolecular forces

Particle-wall interaction, force

Perturbation intermolecular forces/interactions

Physical Interaction Forces

Polar forces interactions

Primary force interactions

Proteins single-force molecular interaction

Pulsed-force mode, interaction forces

Recognition Forces and Molecular Interaction Fields (MIFs)

Scope of the Variables Determining Aerosol Interaction Forces

Secondary force interactions

Single-force molecular interaction

Solute-solvent interactions dipolar forces

Solvent-Induced Interactions and Forces

Surface force hydrophobic interaction

Surface forces measurement brush layer interactions

The Forces between Nucleons. Strong Interactions

The Impact of Molecular Interactions on Atmospheric Aerosol Radiative Forcing

The electric field, force of interaction and work done

Van der Waals, forces interactions

Waals Interactions and London Dispersion Forces

Weak interaction force

© 2024 chempedia.info