Plane surface

A surface crack with right-angular parallelepiped shape is illustrated in Fig.l. A schematic drawing of the positioning of this crack at the surface plane (xOy) is shown in Fig.2. The crack is oriented at an angle O with respect to the direction x of the applied field, and the applied field is considered to be magnetic field for simplicity. 

Fig.l Surface crack with right-angular parallelepiped shape. (xOy ) is the surface plane. 

Fig.2 A schematic drawing of the positioning of the crack at the surface plane.

The van der Waals attraction arises from tlie interaction between instantaneous charge fluctuations m the molecule and surface. The molecule interacts with the surface as a whole. In contrast the repulsive forces are more short-range, localized to just a few surface atoms. The repulsion is, therefore, not homogeneous but depends on the point of impact in the surface plane, that is, the surface is corrugated. 

Single-crystal surfaces are characterized by a set of Miller indices that indicate tlie particular crystallographic orientation of the surface plane relative to the bulk lattice [5]. Thus, surfaces are labelled in the same way that atomic planes are labelled in bulk x-ray crystallography. For example, a Ni (111) surface has a surface plane... 

Alternatively, the electron can exchange parallel momentum with the lattice, but only in well defined amounts given by vectors that belong to the reciprocal lattice of the surface. That is, the vector is a linear combination of two reciprocal lattice vectors a and b, with integer coefficients. Thus, g = ha + kb, with arbitrary integers h and k (note that all the vectors a,b, a, b and g are parallel to the surface). The reciprocal lattice vectors a and are related to tire direct-space lattice vectors a and b through the following non-transparent definitions, which also use a vector n that is perpendicular to the surface plane, as well as vectorial dot and cross products ... 

The polarization dependence of the photon absorbance in metal surface systems also brings about the so-called surface selection rule, which states that only vibrational modes with dynamic moments having components perpendicular to the surface plane can be detected by RAIRS [22, 23 and 24]. This rule may in some instances limit the usefidness of the reflection tecluiique for adsorbate identification because of the reduction in the number of modes visible in the IR spectra, but more often becomes an advantage thanks to the simplification of the data. Furthenuore, the relative intensities of different vibrational modes can be used to estimate the orientation of the surface moieties. This has been particularly useful in the study of self-... 

Figure Bl.22.3. RAIRS data in the C-H stretching region from two different self-assembled monolayers, namely, from a monolayer of dioctadecyldisulfide (ODS) on gold (bottom), and from a monolayer of octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) on silicon (top). Although the RAIRS surface selection rules for non-metallic substrates are more complex than those which apply to metals, they can still be used to detemiine adsorption geometries. The spectra shown here were, in fact, analysed to yield the tilt (a) and twist (p) angles of the molecular chains in each case with respect to the surface plane (the resulting values are also given in the figure) [40].

When a gas comes in contact with a solid surface, under suitable conditions of temperature and pressure, the concentration of the gas (the adsorbate) is always found to be greater near the surface (the adsorbent) than in the bulk of the gas phase. This process is known as adsorption. In all solids, the surface atoms are influenced by unbalanced attractive forces normal to the surface plane adsorption of gas molecules at the interface partially restores the balance of forces. Adsorption is spontaneous and is accompanied by a decrease in the free energy of the system. In the gas phase the adsorbate has three degrees of freedom in the adsorbed phase it has only two. This decrease in entropy means that the adsorption process is always exothermic. Adsorption may be either physical or chemical in nature. In the former, the process is dominated by molecular interaction forces, e.g., van der Waals and dispersion forces. The formation of the physically adsorbed layer is analogous to the condensation of a vapor into a liquid in fret, the heat of adsorption for this process is similar to that of liquefoction. 

Because the electrons do not penetrate into the crystal bulk far enough to experience its three-dimensional periodicity, the diffraction pattern is determined by the two-dimensional surface periodicity described by the lattice vectors ai and ai, which are parallel to the surface plane. A general lattice point within the surface is an integer multiple of these lattice vectors ... 

In the discussion so far we have considered the typical LEIS experiment only, i.e. large angles of incidence of exit relative to the surface plane. Under these conditions, in general, quantitative composition analysis is possible, because the ion-target interaction can be considered as a binary collision, because of the absence of matrix effects (see below). 

The excess energy associated with an interface is formally defined in terms of a surface energy. This may be expressed in terms either of Gibbs, G, or Helmholtz, A, free energies. In order to circumvent difficulties associated with the unavoidably arbitrary position of the surface plane, the surface energy is defined as the surface excess [7,8], i.e the excess (per unit area) of the property concerned consequent upon the presence of the surface. Thus Gibbs surface free energy is defined by... 

FIG. 1 Schematic of two atomically structured, parallel surface planes (from Ref. 134). 

FIG. 19 Scheme of a simple fluid confined by a chemically heterogeneous model pore. Fluid modecules (grey spheres) are spherically symmetric. Each substrate consists of a sequence of crystallographic planes separated by a distance 8 along the z axis. The surface planes of the two opposite substrates are separated by a distance s,. Periodic boundary conditions are imposed in the x and y directions (see text) (from Ref. 77). 

Lateral density fluctuations are mostly confined to the adsorbed water layer. The lateral density distributions are conveniently characterized by scatter plots of oxygen coordinates in the surface plane. Fig. 6 shows such scatter plots of water molecules in the first (left) and second layer (right) near the Hg(l 11) surface. Here, a dot is plotted at the oxygen atom position at intervals of 0.1 ps. In the first layer, the oxygen distribution clearly shows the structure of the substrate lattice. In the second layer, the distribution is almost isotropic. In the first layer, the oxygen motion is predominantly oscillatory rather than diffusive. The self-diffusion coefficient in the adsorbate layer is strongly reduced compared to the second or third layer [127]. The data in Fig. 6 are qualitatively similar to those obtained in the group of Berkowitz and coworkers [62,128-130]. These authors compared the structure near Pt(lOO) and Pt(lll) in detail and also noted that the motion of water in the first layer is oscillatory about equilibrium positions and thus characteristic of a solid phase, while the motion in the second layer has more... 

The view factor depends on the shape of the emitting surface (plane, cylindrical, spherical, or hemispherical), the distance between emitting and receiving surfaces, and the orientation of these surfaces with respect to each other. In general, the view factor from a differential plane dAj) to a flame front (area A,) on a distance L is determined (Figure 3.10) by ... 

This treatment assumes that diffusion of the solute to the surface is not ratecontrolling, which will generally be true. It also assumes that all surface sites are equivalent, which is often not so. For example, different surface planes of single metal crystals have been shown to have markedly different activities. 

Atomic hydrogen plays an essential role in the surface and plasma chemistry of diamond deposition as it contributes to the stabilization of the sp dangling bonds found on the diamond surface plane. Without this stabilizing effect, these bonds would not be maintained and the diamond 111 plane would collapse (flatten out) to the graphite structure. 

How does a support affect the morphology of a particle on top of it Which surface planes does the metal single crystal expose The thermodynamically most stable configuration of such small crystallites is determined by the free energy of the surface facets and the interface with the support, and can be derived by the so-called Wulff construction, which we demonstrate for a cross section through a particle-support assembly in two dimensions (Fig. 5.13). 

At the end of the vector a surface plane is defined orthogonal to the vector. 

The construction relies on Wulff s assumption that the distance from the surface of a specific plane to the center of the crystallite is proportional to the surface energy i.e. hi <=<= Yi. Thus, if we have a surface plane of small surface energy, its distance from the center of the crystallite will be small and this plane will then cut of all others and dominate the polyhedron. 

CO oxidation is often quoted as a structure-insensitive reaction, implying that the turnover frequency on a certain metal is the same for every type of site, or for every crystallographic surface plane. Figure 10.7 shows that the rates on Rh(lll) and Rh(llO) are indeed similar on the low-temperature side of the maximum, but that they differ at higher temperatures. This is because on the low-temperature side the surface is mainly covered by CO. Hence the rate at which the reaction produces CO2 becomes determined by the probability that CO desorbs to release sites for the oxygen. As the heats of adsorption of CO on the two surfaces are very similar, the resulting rates for CO oxidation are very similar for the two surfaces. However, at temperatures where the CO adsorption-desorption equilibrium lies more towards the gas phase, the surface reaction between O and CO determines the rate, and here the two rhodium surfaces show a difference (Fig. 10.7). The apparent structure insensitivity of the CO oxidation appears to be a coincidence that is not necessarily caused by equality of sites or ensembles thereof on the different surfaces. 

---