Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Particle—fluid interaction force

In the two-fluid formulation, the velocity field of each of these two continuous phases is described by its own continuity equation and Navier—Stokes equation (e.g., Anderson and Jackson, 1967 Rietema and Van den Akker, 1983 Sokolichin et al, 2004 Tabib et al, 2008). Each of these Navier-Stokes equations comprises a mutual phase interaction force. Only in the size, or numerical value, of this phase interaction force, particle size may come out. However, in selecting the computational grid or the numerical technique for solving the flow fields of the two continuous phases, particle size is completely irrelevant—due to the definition of mutually interpenetrating continua. [Pg.300]

Due to the very low volumetric concentration of the dispersed particles involved in the fluid flow for most cyclones, the presence of the particles does not have a significant effect on the fluid flow itself. In these circumstances, the fluid and the particle flows may be considered separately in the numerical simulation. A common approach is to first solve the fluid flow equations without considering the presence of particles, and then simulate the particle flow based on the solution of the fluid flow to compute the drag and other interactive forces that act on the particles. [Pg.1208]

We should mention here one of the important limitations of the singlet level theory, regardless of the closure applied. This approach may not be used when the interaction potential between a pair of fluid molecules depends on their location with respect to the surface. Several experiments and theoretical studies have pointed out the importance of surface-mediated [1,87] three-body forces between fluid particles for fluid properties at a solid surface. It is known that the depth of the van der Waals potential is significantly lower for a pair of particles located in the first adsorbed layer. In... [Pg.187]

The fluid-particle interaction force, omitting the virtual mass term and combining the pressure terms in the equation of motion becomes... [Pg.33]

The volumetric fluid-particle interaction force F0 in Eq. (28) is calculated from the forces acting on the individual particles in a cell ... [Pg.14]

Note that depending on the manner in which the drag force and the buoyancy force are accounted for in the decomposition of the total fluid particle interactive force, different forms of the particle motion equation may result (Jackson, 2000). In Eq. (36), the total fluid-particle interaction force is considered to be decomposed into two parts a drag force (fd) and a fluid stress gradient force (see Eq. (2.29) in Jackson, 2000)). The drag force can be related to that expressed by the Wen-Yu equation, /wen Yu> by... [Pg.15]

In the two-fluid formulation, the motion or velocity field of each of the two continuous phases is described by its own momentum balances or NS equations (see, e.g., Rietema and Van den Akker, 1983 or Van den Akker, 1986). In both momentum balances, a phase interaction force between the two continuous phases occurs predominantly, of course with opposite sign. Two-fluid models therefore belong to the class of two-way coupling approaches. The continuum formulation of the phase interaction force should reflect the same effects as experienced by the individual particles and discussed above in the context of the Lagrangian description of dispersed two-phase flow. [Pg.169]

One therefore has to decide here which components of the phase interaction force (drag, virtual mass, Saffman lift, Magnus, history, stress gradients) are relevant and should be incorporated in the two sets of NS equations. The reader is referred to more specific literature, such as Oey et al. (2003), for reports on the effects of ignoring certain components of the interaction force in the two-fluid approach. The question how to model in the two-fluid formulation (lateral) dispersion of bubbles, drops, and particles in swarms is relevant... [Pg.169]

Lu et al. [7] extended the mass-spring model of the interface to include a dashpot, modeling the interface as viscoelastic, as shown in Fig. 3. The continuous boundary conditions for displacement and shear stress were replaced by the equations of motion of contacting molecules. The interaction forces between the contacting molecules are modeled as a viscoelastic fluid, which results in a complex shear modulus for the interface, G = G + mG", where G is the storage modulus and G" is the loss modulus. G is a continuum molecular interaction between liquid and surface particles, representing the force between particles for a unit shear displacement. The authors also determined a relationship for the slip parameter Eq. (18) in terms of bulk and molecular parameters [7, 43] ... [Pg.70]

A simple long-range interaction force between particles of the fcth component at site x and the Mi component at site x is introduced and the total fluid/fluid interaction force on the Mi component at site x is given by ... [Pg.268]

In gas-solid flows, flow patterns of both phases depend not only on the initial conditions and physical boundaries of the system but also on the mechanisms of momentum transfer or the interacting forces between the phases. The forces controlling the motions of particles may be classified into three groups (1) forces through the interface between fluid and particles, (2) forces due to the interactions between particles, and (3) forces imposed by external fields. Although interparticle forces and field forces do not directly change the course of the fluid motion, they may indirectly influence the motion via particle-fluid interactions. [Pg.87]

Equations (5.139) to (5.142) are the basic equations for a gas-solid flow. More detailed information on both the fluid-particle interacting force Fa and the total stresses T and Tp must be specified before these equations can be solved. One approach to formulate the fluid-particle interacting force FA is to decompose the total stress into a component E representing the macroscopic variations in the fluid stress tensor on a scale that is large compared to the particle spacing, and a component e representing the effect of detailed variations of the point stress tensor as the fluid flows around the particle [Anderson and... [Pg.192]

The interacting force imposed by the particles on the fluid phase, FA, is given by... [Pg.193]

In a packed bed, the fluid-particle interaction force is insufficient to support the weight of the particles. Hence, the fluid that percolates through the particles loses energy due to frictional dissipation. This results in a loss of pressure that is greater than can be accounted for by... [Pg.214]

Kinetic equations for reversible adsorption and reversible coagulation are established when the interaction potential has primary and secondary minima of comparable depths. The process is assumed to occur in two successive steps. First the particles move from the bulk of the fluid to the secondary minimum. A fraction of the particles which have arrived al the secondary minimum move further to the primary minimum. Quasi-steady state is assumed for each of the steps separately. Conditions are identified under which rates of reversible adsorption or coagulation at the primary minimum can be computed by neglecting the rate of accumulation at the secondary minimum. The interaction force boundary layer approach has been improved by introducing the tangential velocity of the particles near the surface of the collector into the kinetic equations. To account for reversibility a short-range repulsion term is included in the interaction potential. [Pg.130]

Compared to small molecules the description of convective diffusion of particles of finite size in a fluid near a solid boundary has to account for both the interaction forces between particles and collector (such as van der Waals and double-layer forces) and for the hydrodynamic interactions between particles and fluid. The effect of the London-van der Waals forces and doublelayer attractive forces is important if the range over which they act is comparable to the thickness over which the convective diffusion affects the transport of the particles. If, however, because of the competition between the double-layer repulsive forces and London attractive forces, a potential barrier is generated, then the effect of the interaction forces is important even when they act over distances much shorter than the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer. For... [Pg.130]


See other pages where Particle—fluid interaction force is mentioned: [Pg.381]    [Pg.999]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.777]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.294]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.439 ]




SEARCH



Fluid particles

Fluid-particle interaction

Interaction force

Particle interaction

Particle interaction forces

© 2024 chempedia.info