Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interaction forces parameter

Calculation of Solute Separation and Product Rate. Once the pore size distribution parameters R, ou R >,2, 02, and h2 are known for a membrane and the interfacial interaction force parameters B and D are known for a given system of membrane material-solute, solute separation f can be calculated by eq 6 for any combination of these parameters. Furthermore, because the PR-to-PWP ratio (PR/PWP) can also be calculated by the surface force-pore flow model (9), PR is obtained by multiplying experimental PWP data by this ratio. [Pg.149]

Table III. Data on Interfacial Interaction Force Parameters for Some Potential Water Pollutants... Table III. Data on Interfacial Interaction Force Parameters for Some Potential Water Pollutants...
Table V. Interfacial Interaction Force Parameters Used... Table V. Interfacial Interaction Force Parameters Used...
The differences between the surface force-pore flow model and the solution-diffusion model are (1) the microscopic structure of the membrane is incorporated explicitly into the transport equations as the pore radius in the surface force-pore flow model (2) the interaction force working between the permeant and the membrane is also incorporated into the transport equations as an interaction force parameter in the surface force-pore flow model (3) as mentioned in Chapter 5, the solution-diffusion model describes the transport of permeants through the membrane, as an uncoupled diffusive flow. Mass transfer by the diffusive flow is expressed by a set of transport parameters that are intrinsic to the polymeric material. Any flow other than the above intrinsic diffusive flow is... [Pg.222]

In a fundamental sense, the miscibility, adhesion, interfacial energies, and morphology developed are all thermodynamically interrelated in a complex way to the interaction forces between the polymers. Miscibility of a polymer blend containing two polymers depends on the mutual solubility of the polymeric components. The blend is termed compatible when the solubility parameter of the two components are close to each other and show a single-phase transition temperature. However, most polymer pairs tend to be immiscible due to differences in their viscoelastic properties, surface-tensions, and intermolecular interactions. According to the terminology, the polymer pairs are incompatible and show separate glass transitions. For many purposes, miscibility in polymer blends is neither required nor de-... [Pg.649]

The ratio (p/G) has the units of time and is known as the elastic time constant, te, of the material. Little information exists in the published literature on the rheomechanical parameters, p, and G for biomaterials. An exception is red blood cells for which the shear modulus of elasticity and viscosity have been measured by using micro-pipette techniques 166,68,70,72]. The shear modulus of elasticity data is usually given in units of N m and is sometimes compared with the interfacial tension of liquids. However, these properties are not the same. Interfacial tension originates from an imbalance of surface forces whereas the shear modulus of elasticity is an interaction force closely related to the slope of the force-distance plot (Fig. 3). Typical reported values of the shear modulus of elasticity and viscosity of red blood cells are 6 x 10 N m and 10 Pa s respectively 1701. Red blood cells typically have a mean length scale of the order of 7 pm, thus G is of the order of 10 N m and the elastic time constant (p/G) is of the order of 10 s. [Pg.88]

From the changes in the obtained potential profiles, we evaluated the interaction coefficient P and, compared it with the theoretical calculation of p, we also confirmed that the proposed method could evaluate the interaction force without any fitting parameters, which have usually been required in the typical correlation method. [Pg.121]

The increase in the rheological parameters, ri0> G0 and 1(5 with reduction in surface coverage points towards an increase in particle interaction. This could be the result of either flocculation by polymer "bridging" (which is favourable at coverages <0.5) or as a result of coagulation due to the van der Waals attraction between the "bare" patches on the particles. In the absence of any quantitative relationship between interaction forces and rheology, it is clearly difficult... [Pg.420]

In a subsequent study, NoorBatcha et al. varied the valence-force parameters used for the lattice interactions to evaluate the effect of the vibrational properties of the crystal on diffusion characteristics. Using three sets of lattice potential parameters, they determined a range of effective activation barriers for diffusion of 3.63 kcal/mole to 7.47 kcal/mole on the Si(001) surface. This range encompasses the experimental estimate of 4.6 kcal/mole for the Si(lll) surface, and further suggests this value as the more accurate experimental estimate. [Pg.318]

Lu et al. [7] extended the mass-spring model of the interface to include a dashpot, modeling the interface as viscoelastic, as shown in Fig. 3. The continuous boundary conditions for displacement and shear stress were replaced by the equations of motion of contacting molecules. The interaction forces between the contacting molecules are modeled as a viscoelastic fluid, which results in a complex shear modulus for the interface, G = G + mG", where G is the storage modulus and G" is the loss modulus. G is a continuum molecular interaction between liquid and surface particles, representing the force between particles for a unit shear displacement. The authors also determined a relationship for the slip parameter Eq. (18) in terms of bulk and molecular parameters [7, 43] ... [Pg.70]

Nonpolar Parameters. In a reverse osmosis system involving cellulose acetate membranes and aqueous solutions of hydrocarbon solutes, the adsorption of water and that of solute on the polar and nonpolar sites of the membrane surface respectively may be expected to take place essentially independently. Further, since the polymer-solute interaction forces are attractive in nature for the above case, the mobility of the solute molecules through the membrane pore is retarded, and they also tend to agglomerate... [Pg.35]

The interpretation of interaction parameters is far from stredghtforward. Calculations on model systems (2 c), and comparisons between parameters and force constants in real systems (4), show that the parameters contain several different terms. Thus in octahedral carbonyls, the cis interaction parameter, which is smaller than the trans parameter, originates mainly from the true cis interaction force constant. The trans interaction parameter, on the other hand, contains only a small direct contribution, while the main terms are indirect and involve MC,MC and MC.C O interaction constants. Calculations on substituted... [Pg.5]

Explain the link between the critical packing parameter and the interaction forces between surfactant molecules in water. [Pg.75]

We have already seen from Example 10.1 that van der Waals forces play a major role in the heat of vaporization of liquids, and it is not surprising, in view of our discussion in Section 10.2 about colloid stability, that they also play a significant part in (or at least influence) a number of macroscopic phenomena such as adhesion, cohesion, self-assembly of surfactants, conformation of biological macromolecules, and formation of biological cells. We see below in this chapter (Section 10.7) some additional examples of the relation between van der Waals forces and macroscopic properties of materials and investigate how, as a consequence, measurements of macroscopic properties could be used to determine the Hamaker constant, a material property that represents the strength of van der Waals attraction (or repulsion see Section 10.8b) between macroscopic bodies. In this section, we present one illustration of the macroscopic implications of van der Waals forces in thermodynamics, namely, the relation between the interaction forces discussed in the previous section and the van der Waals equation of state. In particular, our objective is to relate the molecular van der Waals parameter (e.g., 0n in Equation (33)) to the parameter a that appears in the van der Waals equation of state ... [Pg.477]

Indicate in each case the intermolecular interaction forces, the key structural features of the sorbate, the site type(s) of the sorbent involved, and the environmental parameters influencing sorption. [Pg.449]

We find that long-range interactions responsible for decoherence can be modeled by dispersion forces U(r) = C(f6 and show no dependence on the number of degrees of freedom in the buffer gas molecules. Dispersion force parameters Cg were extracted (see Table 1) according to the equation ... [Pg.35]

TheD term accounts for part of the effects of solution enthalpy. Enthalpy of mixing results when the solute-solvent interaction force is different from the solute-solute and the solvent-solvent interactions. Intermolecularforces can be further characterized as dispersion, dipolar, and hydrogen-bond forces. In the mobile order solubility approach, dispersion and dipolar forces were not separated. The effects of these two forces on solubility were expressed in terms of modiLed solubility parameters, S andSj. The relationship between solubility and solubility parameters can be derived in the... [Pg.25]

In non-contact SFM, the effective contact diameter of a spherical tip (R) and a flat surface is given by the area of a flat disk whose interaction force with the surface is the same as that of the tip-surface interaction at the same surface separation D [77]. The disk diameter can be calculated as d=2VRD. For a typical set of experimental parameters such as R=10 nm and D=1 nm, the effective interaction diameter is about d=6.3 nm. In practice, the lateral resolution in non-... [Pg.102]

Herein, cl and cG are parameters responding to the capillary forces which has an effect between the solid and gas phase and between the liquid and gas phase, respectively. They depend on the form and nature of the pores and of the surface tensions between the phases. This new approach to the interaction forces allows the description of capillary motion in porous solids, see de Boer Didwania [6]. [Pg.362]


See other pages where Interaction forces parameter is mentioned: [Pg.143]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.585]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.453 ]




SEARCH



Force parameters

Interaction force

Interactive parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info