Task performance, employee

Whether based on past performance or current performance, predictors must not only be accurate, they must also be relevant to the actual tasks to be performed. In other words, the criteria against which candidates performance is assessed must match those of the tasks to be performed (Swezey 1981). One way to ensure that predictors match tasks is to use criterion-referenced assessment of predictor variables for employee selection. To do this, one must ensure that the predictors match the tasks for which one is selecting candidates as closely as possible on three relevant dimensions the conditions under which the tasks will be performed, the actions required to perform the task, and the standards against which successful task performance wiU be measured. While it is better to have multiple predictors for each important job task (at least one measure of past performance and one of current performance), it may not always be possible to obtain multiple predictors. We do not recommend using a single predictor for multiple tasks—the predictor is likely to be neither reliable nor valid. 

While the focus is on the operations system, created by management and which only management can change, it is not intended that the significance of employee-centered, task performance causal factors be diminished. 

A job hazard analysis is a job design review that is to assess the physical hazards and the task performance hazards, taking into consideration the capabilities and limitations of people, and their possible quirky behavior. For work hazards that are not to be eliminated or controlled through a redesign initiative, obviously, the appropriate administrative practices would be applied. In so doing, the procedures employed should keep the risks of employee injury or illness or environmental damage at an acceptable minimum. 

One of my purposes here is to suggest that, often, a causal factor identified as an employee error or an unsafe act may actually be programmed into the prescribed work methods. That occurs when the design of the work is overly stressful, or error-provocative, or encourages riskier actions than desired. If the work is so designed, it is reasonable to assume that a performance deviation is principally a systemic problem rather than a task performance problem. 

Under federal law, if an employee is temporarily unable to perform her job due to pregnancy or childbirth, the employer must treat her the same as any other temporarily disabled employee. For example, if the employer allows temporarily disabled employees to modify tasks, perform alternative assignments, or take disability leave or leave without pay, the employer also must allow an employee who is temporarily disabled due to pregnancy to do the same. 

However, coaching and mentoring are distinct. Coaching differs from the other roles of mentoring in that coaches help with specific, practical, task performance and skill-development. They are often coaching the employee toward a particular objective, which may be pragmatic and/or relational. 

Some jobs involve only a few simple, routine tasks. Others involve doing many tasks, some more often than others. It is important to keep records of observations. See Table 14.1 for an example of a Job Safety Observation Form. The results will tell each supervisor just what has been or should be done about a particular worker. A Job Safety Observation Form contains the employee s name, department, job title, and a list of the tasks performed when doing that job. If the employee has completed the task safely, place an S in the appropriate column to indicate that the task was performed satisfactorily. An R indicates that, for some reason(s), the employee should be observed again at a later time. Use the comments space to record any observed unsafe practices, or any other information about the task(s) or the worker. To choose the task to observe, consider whether (1) it involves some new procedures because of a recent JSA revision, (2) there has been a change in equipment or machinery, (3) it poses an exceptional hazard, or (4) it is a job infrequently done but is complex. A U indicates unsatisfactory performance at a particular task and corrective action is required. 

Requesting employees to provide, in writing and in their own words, descriptions of their jobs. These should include the tasks performed and the tools, materials, and equipment used. 

Normally unoccupied remote facility means a facility which is operated, maintained or serviced by employees who visit the facility only periodically to check its operation and to perform necessary operating or maintenance tasks. No employees are permanently sta-... 

Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2) This paragraph does not require the employer to estimate the incident heat energy exposure for every job task performed by each employee. The employer may make broad estimates that cover multiple system areas provided the employer uses reasonable assumptions about the energy-exposure distribution throughout the system and provided the estimates represent the maximum employee exposure for those areas. For example, the employer could estimate the heat energy just outside a substation feeding a radial distribution system and use that estimate for all jobs performed on that radial system. 

Making estimates over muitipie system areas. The employer need not estimate the heat-energy exposure for every job task performed by each employee. Paragraph (g)(2) of 1926.960 permits the employer to make broad estimates that cover multiple system areas provided that ... 

The job hazard analysis is a very important and effective process to determine hazardous conditions, unsafe practices, and system weaknesses. In this process the supervisor and an employee work together to analyze the specific task. The employee is observed performing the task. Next, they break the task down into steps. At this point, they jointly assess each step to identify any conditions and practices that might cause an injury/illness. Next, they work together on means and methods to eliminate those hazards. They revise procedures to make the task less hazardous. The supervisor, safety director, or safety committee should then take the process to its completion by uncovering the systems weaknesses related to the hazards found during the JHA. 

The methods used in the field study were direct observation of the activities and the environment and a video and photographic record of the tasks. Following that, there were semi-structured interviews (elaborated by the authors) with the worker with disabilities and his supervisor, with the intent of identify the tasks performed. The employees with disabilities answered a socio-demographic questionnaire (elaborated by the authors) and data was collected from the company about absences and worker s productivity, with and without disabilities, that performed the same tasks in order to make a comparative analysis. The employees without disabilities that would have their data compared were determined randomly and according to tasks performed, because it would be necessary to compare the productivity of similar activities. 

The Productivity is measured by the company in accordance with the amount of tasks performed for each function, that results in a value in Reals, Brazilian money, that is added to the employee s paycheck. Data was collected from the company about worker s productivity. The amount of productivity received by the workers, with and without disabilities, is presented in Table 1. 

JHA is an HA technique for identifying and mitigating job related hazards. JHA analyzes the tasks associated with performing a certain job in order to identify hazards associated with the job tasks and to establish corrective action (mitigation) methods for reducing the risk presented by the hazards. The intent of JHA is to ensure a safe workplace for employees by eliminating or mitigating hazards in any of the job tasks the employees will perform. 

It does not include maintenance activities, repair, removal, or other construction work involving disturbance or removal of ACM or PACM. Neither does it include clean-up and disposal of dust or debris resulting from construction, renovation, removal, repair, or maintenance activities. Performance of these tasks by employees may trigger additional obligations. Workers who are involved in cleaning areas that have been contaminated with asbestos containing dust or debris from a project involving asbestos come under the Construction Industry Standard at 1926.1101. 

The analysis phase of the instructional systems design (ISD) model, as referred to in Chapter 4, consists of a job task analysis based upon the equipment, operations, tools, and materials to be used as well as the knowledge and skills required for each position. Most important in this phase is the selection of the performance and learning objectives each employee must master to be successful in their job as related to the toll. 

You ean break down every job into basie tasks or steps. To begin, list eaeh step in the order of oeeurrenee as you wateh the employee perform the job. No basie step should be omitted. Make sure you reeord enough information to deseribe eaeh aetion. Wlien this is eompleted, review the steps with the employee. 

Detection of preexisting diseases or medical conditions that place employees performing certain tasks at increased risk... 

D. Task-specific hazard analyses must lead to the development of written standard operating procedures (SOPs) that specify the controls necessary to safely perform each task. Detailed hazard analyses conducted for each site task and operation provide the basis for developing SOPs to protect employees from safety and health hazards. Written SOPs provide a mechanism for informing employees of procedures that ensure their safety and for enabling management to enforce hazard control procedures. 

The prime contractor s SSAHPs for Sites D, E, and G and the subcontractor s SSAHP for Site I did not contain detailed discussions of specific work tasks to be performed by employees or the hazards associated with those tasks. As a result, SOPs associated with each job or task had not been prepared. 

Employers who use eontraetors to perform work in and around proeesses that involve highly hazardous ehemieals have to establish a sereening proeess so that they hire and use only eontraetors who aeeomplish the desired job tasks without eompromising the safety and health of any employees at a faeility. For eontraetors whose safety performanee on the job is not known to the hiring employer, the employer must obtain information on injury and illness rates and experienee and should obtain... 

Contract employees must perform their work safely. Considering that contractors often perform very specialized and potentially hazardous tasks, such as confined space entry activities and nonroutine repair activities, their work must be controlled while they are on or near a process covered by PSM. A permit system or work authorization system for these activities is helpful for all affected employers. The use of a work authorization system keeps an employer informed of contract employee activities. Thus, the employer has better coordination and more management control over the work being performed in the process area. 

Are employees aware of the existenee and loeation of SOPs for safely performing job tasks [OSHA Referenee. 120(d)(3)]... 

Nowadays many companies have adopted a policy of continuous improvement of working conditions. Therefore, it is desirable to create target levels for those who want to pursue more efficient control by applying the best available control technologies. There are also endeavors to create optimal working conditions in order to improve the performance and the innovativeness of a staff, and hence enhance productivity. A series of laboratory and case studies show that employee productivity is higher when the work environment is appropriate for the tasks being done.- Such efforts are typical in the advanced sector of industry. One can say that there is a transition from blue-collar to white-collar work. ... 

While not every employee will be interested in the PSM system as a whole, preferring to focus on individual tasks and requirements, it s a good idea to offer the opportunity to learn more. You may find that performance improves as people understand how what they are doing affects other parts of the system and business operations as a whole. 

---