Defining Sample Preparation Requirements

Several objective methods are available to determine the freshness of shrimp however, many require a) raw products for analysis, b) complex chemistry and equipment for testing, or c) highly trained technicians. Additionally, some of these methods require extensive analysis time making results meaningless if product has already spoiled or has been released to consumers. Results for the impedance method discussed in the present paper demonstrate that spoilage of raw or thermally processed shrimp can be detect in 30 min with easy sample preparation. The limitations of this method revolve around the requirement for authentic fresh frozen standards as a basis for comparison. Further research is necessary to define the effect of seasonal and geographical variations, and species and size difference. The sum of these factors will likely affect the reproducibility of this method. 

The validation requirements are discussed as they apply to both the sample preparation and sample analysis aspects of a dissolution method. The focus of the discussion in this chapter is on the validation considerations that are unique to a dissolution method. Validation is the assessment of the performance of a defined test method. The result of any successful validation exercise is a comprehensive set of data that will support the suitability of the test method for its intended use. To this end, execution of a validation exercise without a clearly defined plan can lead to many difficulties, including an incomplete or flawed set of validation data. Planning for the validation exercise must include the following determination of what performance characteristics to assess (i.e., strategy), how to assess each characteristic (i.e., experimental), and what minimum standard of performance is expected (i.e., criteria). The preparation of a validation protocol is highly recommended to clearly define the experiments and associated criteria. Validation of a test method must include experiments to assess both the sample preparation (i.e., sample dissolution) and the sample analysis. ICH Q2A [1] provides guidance for the validation characteristics of the dissolution test and is summarized in Table 4.1. 

Evaluation of VOC and SVOC emission potential of individual products and materials under indoor-related conditions and over defined timescales requires the use of climate-controlled emission testing systems, so-called emission test chambers and cells, the size of which can vary between a few cm3 and several m3, depending on the application. In Figure 5.1 the dots ( ) represent volumes of test devices reported in the literature. From this size distribution they can be classified as large scale chambers, small scale chambers, micro scale chambers and cells. The selection of the systems, the sampling preparation and the test performance all depend on the task to be performed. According to ISO, chambers and cells are defined as follows ... 

In what many consider to be a landmark publication on metabolomics, Fiehn et al. (2000) state it is crucial to perform unbiased (metabolite) analyses in order to define precisely the biochemical function of plant metabolism. The authors argue that for metabolomics/metabolite profiling to become a robust and sensitive method suited to automation, a mature technology such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is required as an analytical technique. The authors go on to describe a simple sample preparation and analysis regime that allowed for the detection and quantification of more than 300 compounds from a single-leaf sample extract. 

This is the place to start, since most often, analytical chemists are trying to help solve someone else s problem. We need to define the solute and its matrix as well as the nature of the analytical problem. For example, in the world of pharmaceuticals, there are raw material identification and purity determinations, in-process testing, dosage-form determinations, content uniformity, dissolution testing, stability studies, bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and drug metabolism, to name a few. Each of these analytical problems has its own specific requirements. The matrix can be a raw material, granulation, tablet, capsule, solution, lotion, cream, syrup, dissolution medium, blood serum, urine, or various body tissues and fluids. Similar definitions can be described for virtually any industrial area and problem set. These definitions will help select sample preparation, separation, and detection techniques. 

In practice an instrumental detection limit is of limited use because in analytical chemistry it is rare that no other procedural steps are involved. Normally a limit of detection for the whole analytical method is required. The terminology used in this area is confusing. In general, limit of detection and detection limit are synonymous. The detection limit will encompass factors such as (a) sample matrix effects (b) loss of the analyte during sample preparation etc. The detection limit for the analytical procedure is defined as The minimum single result which, with a stated prohahility, can be distinguished from a suitable blank value . ... 

The other preliminary operations following sampling can be dealt with as a whole in relation to the concept sample preparation (SP). This term is widely used at present, but is occasionally confused with sample pretreatment as the boundary between the two (I.e. where sample pretreatment ends or what preoedes and follows sample preparation), if any, is rather ill-defined. To the authors minds, sample preparation includes every step required to make the sample — or, rather, the target analytes contained in the original sample — ready for insertion into the measuring instrument and may involve more than one step this is consistent with lUPAC s statement that sample preparation is intended to transfer or transform the analytes into measurable forms [2]. On the other hand, sample pretreatment can be envisaged as the first step in sample preparation or as a step... 

The method-development laboratory is olfen set with a task of identifying unknown constituents in a complex sample. The identity or quantity of analytes is not well defined at this stage. Complicated sample-preparation steps and multiple HPLC analyses may be required to ascertain the nature of a sample. The diode array detector simplifies this process. In the case that more than 15 different peaks have been separated in a analysis of a multicomponent sample of known origin more than a full day s work might be required just to establish the retention times of the unknowns with the use of a standard absorbance detector. A number of long-run HPLC analyses would have to be made with pure standards so that retention time correlations could be determined. This necessity is accomplished by the DAD s advantage of acquiring data in both the time and spectral domain. 

Laser ablation can be carried out on any material without special sample preparation. The laser beam can be directed onto a defined spot of the sample or moved to different parts to analyse over a defined area. It can be moved in an XYZ plane using a stepper motor and driven in translational motions on which the cell is mounted and with more expensive models can be turned for analysis in other parts of the sample. Lasers can operate in UV, visible, and IR regions of the spectrum and a recent development in laser technology uses neodymium yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd YAG) which gives high repetition rate at a comparatively low power. This method of analysis is suited to bulk analysis of solid materials and the amount of volatility varies from sample to sample. The size of the laser spot can vary from 10 to 250 pm and little or no sample preparation is required. Errors are greatly reduced because of the simple sample preparation, and the fact that no solvents are required reduces interferences. 

---