Road Users Safety

In this thesis, the term "Road Safety" is often used instead of "Traffic Safety" because this thesis focuses on road traffic safefy only including road user safety and vehicle safety. The term Traffic Safety is a general term and could refer to the safety of all traffic modes air traffic, sea, rail and road. 

A flagger is a person who provides temporary traffic control when permanent traffic controls (signs, signals, and barricades) do not provide the necessary protection for operations on highways or streets. Because flaggers are responsible for road user safety and make frequent contact with the public, they should meet the following minimum qualiflcations ... 

Tasca, L. (2000). A review of the literature on aggressive driving research. Ontario Advisory Group on Safe Driving Secretariat, Road User Safety Branch. Ontario Ministry of Transportation, Canada. 

Traffic Safety, Volume 4 of the Research for Innovative Transports Set, presents a collection of updated papers from the TRA 2014 Conference, highlighting the diversity of research in this field. Theoretical chapters and practical case studies address topics such as road safety management and policies, accident analysis and modeling, vulnerable road users safety, road infrastructure safety, ITS and railway safety. 

Best course of action is not to get into the car. Explain your concerns for the driver s safety and that of other road users. Consider informing police of situation to ensure safety of driver and others. 

Grayson, G.B. and Hakkcrt, A.S. (1988). Accident analysis and conflict behaviour. In J.A. Rothengatter and R.A. de Bruin (eds.), Road Users and Traffic Safety. Van Gorcum, Assen. 

Horst, R. van der (1991), Video analysis of road user behavior at intersections. In T.W. van der Schaaf, D.A. Lucas and A.R. Hale (eds), Near Miss Reporting as a Safety Tool. Butterwortb-Heinemann. Oxford,... 

Although there are many attempts have been made to describe road accident problem, I used to describe the problem as a disease where the causes of road accidents are symptoms as (illness). The road safety problem is a sign of illness in society. To diagnose the problem, there are direct and indirect symptoms (causes). The direct symptoms in road safety can be easily seen in society from simple observation and data such as speed problems, alcohol and driving, vehicle conditions, road user behaviour, etc. The indirect symptoms in road safety are not simply obvious and they need more checking and examination such as the traffic management, education, traffic police enforcement, legislations, etc. 

I have identified eight groups of indicators (see Figure 3.3) of which each corresponds to a special area of road safety. The groups listed are traffic risk, personal risk, socioeconomic indicators, road safety organisational structure, traffic police and enforcement, vehicle safety, roads situation and road user behaviour. The groups measure road safety development in terms of output or input classes. The output... 

Nevertheless, some other studies have tried to explain why the curve of development (fatality rates) declines downwards as been noted in many countries and shown in Smeed s formula. The studies have analysed the factors and measures that influence the development of the curve of road safety. A review of these studies is reported by (Elvik Vaa, 2004) and (Hakim, 1991). Besides, Minter (1987) and Oppe (1991b) showed that Smeed s law is a result of a national learning process over time. The development in society at the national level is the result from the developments at the local level. In other words, the individuals (road users) can learn by experience in traffic where they improve their driving skills and knowledge, while the whole society can learn by better national policy and action plans. The Figure shown here illustrates these factors on the development curve of road safety. 

In principle, eight general themes have been selected in the construction of RSDI, which are traffic risk, personal risk, vehicle safety, roads situation, road user behaviour, socio-... 

RSDI = 0,25 (traffic risk) + 0,10 (personal risk) + 0,10 (vehicle safety) + 0,10 (road level) + 0,25 (road users behaviour) + 0,05 (urban population level) + 0,05 (income level) + 0,05 (health level) + 0,05 (education level)... 

Rasshofer, R. H., Schwarz, D., Morhart, C., Biebl, E. (2009). Cooperative sensor technology for preventive vulnerable road user protection. In list International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV 2009). No. 09-0136. 

Dahdah, S. (2008). Modeling an infrastructure safety rating for vulnerable road users in developing countries. Dissertation, The George Washington University. 

Road Safety Audit considers the safety of all road users and in particular vulnerable road users such as the visually and mobility impaired, cyclists, pedestrians, equestrians, motorcyclists, children and the elderly. 

Road Safety Audit has to consider all road users... 

Although Road Safety Audit does look at scheme design from the road user s point of view, it is not in fact a road user audit - which aims to ensure that each road user has been adequately catered for within a scheme. The Highways Agency has recently published a Standard describing how to undertake Non-Motorised User Audits. ... 

Finally, the definition of safety often understood within the standards relates to how engineers design roads as opposed to how individuals use them. Visibility splays, size and location of signs, and protection of street furniture all relate to the design speed on a new road. Ffowever, if road users perceive the road to be faster, they will drive it as such, sometimes leading to accident occurrence. 

The Road Safety Audit should be looked at from all road users perspectives. 

This section examines a number of sources of information and presents results from published sources. Only research published since 1990 has been included. The information ranges from engineering issues such as alignment and jimction type, through to road user issues. Where possible, safety information describes typical accident patterns including the type of road users at risk, any before and after results, and the sources of the information. Reference to accidents throughout this chapter should be taken to mean injury accidents unless otherwise stated. 

This Standard gives advice on the design of roundabouts including a section on safety and one on road users specific requirements. 

There are sections on safety and road users specific requirements. 

This section examines safety from the point of view of some of those most affected, namely the vulnerable road users who tend to be more seriously injured when accidents occur. 

There could be concern that Road Safety Audit adds unnecessarily to the cost of a scheme and lengthens the time for the scheme to proceed towards implementation. On the other hand, highway authorities have spent considerable sums on remedial treatments to road schemes less than five years old, resulting in inconvenience, delay and added risk to road users. 

To establish road user groups that may warrant investigation, a consensus survey utilizing a modified Delphi technique was conducted nationally with experts in the fields of road and rail safety in 2004 and confirmed with current literature and research with Train Drivers as key informants. Older drivers, younger drivers and heavy vehicles drivers were indicated to be potential at-risk groups by the panel of... 

Prefacing the part, novel approaches such as using insurance data, theory of constraints, the use of techniques such as ICAM and minimizing road user errors provide an interesting flavom to safety data management and meaning. 

The promises and anticipation of the positive effects of the Intelligent Transport System (ITS) are huge. The hope is that ITS will help road users utilize the infrastructure in a more efficient way, thereby enabling better comfort, efficiency and safety. Secondary effects also promise to be significant, e.g. if ITS succeeds with increasing road safety the reduced number of severely injured or killed persons in traffic could decrease rehabilitation and hospital cost enormously (see e.g. [15, 16, 17]). 

The knowledge that road users would, at least some of the time, change their behaviour in response to the introduction of road safety measures motivated the road safety community into action in the late 1980s, when the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) created a scientific expert group from among 16 OECD countries, whose mission was to review to what extent and... 

---