Risk groups

Royal Society Study Group. Risk Assessment. London Royal Society, 1983. [Pg.447]

Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Risk factors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, Arch. Ophthalmol., 110, 1701-1708, 1992. [Pg.105]

Age-Related Eye Disease Smdy Research Group. Risk factors associated with age-related nuclear and cortical cataract a case-control smdy in the Age-Related Eye Disease Smdy, AREDS Report No. 5. Ophthalmology 2001 108 1400-1408. [Pg.302]

The RISC Group Risk of myocardid infarction and death during treatment with low dose aspirin and intravenous heparin in men with unstable coronary artery disease. Lancd336 827,1990... [Pg.491]

Approx. average diaatitm (years) Approx, control group risk (per year) Antiplatetet Adjusted controls Odds ratio and confidence interval Approx, vascular events avoided per 1000 ptdients treated per year... [Pg.538]

Thromboembolic Risk Factors (THRIFT) Consensus Group. Risk of and prophylaxis for venous... [Pg.548]

Kojima S, Ohara A, Tsuchida M, Kudoh T, Hanada R, Okimoto Y, Kaneko T, Takano T, Ikuta K, Tsukimoto I Japan Childhood Aplastic Anemia Study Group. Risk factors for evolution of acquired aplastic anemia into myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia after immunosuppressive therapy in children. Blood 2002 100(3) 786-90. [Pg.1552]

Dieleman JP, Sturkenboom MC, Jambroes M, Gyssens 1C, Weverling GJ, ten Veen JH, Schrey G, Reiss P, Strieker BH Athena Study Group. Risk factors for urological symptoms in a cohort of users of the HIV protease inhibitor indinavir sulfate the ATHENA cohort. Arch Intern Med 2002 162 1493-501. [Pg.90]

Eiseviers M.M., De Broe M.E., the 5-ASA-Study Group. Risk of chronic interstitial nephritis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with 5-ASA therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 11 128A, 2000. [Pg.416]

Risk Group Risk Factors Rate (%) Rate (%)... [Pg.2452]

ECOS-DoD (2007). Identification and selection of toxidty values/criteria for CERCLA and hazardous waste site risk assessments in the absence of IRIS values. Emerging Contaminants Task Group Risk Assessment Provisional Values Subgroup Issue Paper. Environmental Council of States, Department of Defense Sustainability Work Group. Accessed at http //www.ecos.org/files/2733 file FINAL ECOS PV Paper 4 23 07.doc. [Pg.89]

Thompson Publishing Group. Risk Management Program Handbook. Paragraphs 414, 418, 420, 424, 434, 458, 460, 710 (updated monthly). [Pg.1480]

To the Royal Society Study Groups, risk is the probability that a particular adverse event occurs during a stated period of time or results from a particular challenge . [Pg.15]

United Kingdom GovemmenlAndustry Working Group, Risk Assessment of Existing Substances, Department of the Environment, London, 1993, pp. 69. [Pg.31]

Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U et al. and the DIS Group. Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM the Diabetes Intervention Study, 11-year follow-up. Diabetologia 1996 39 1577-1583. [Pg.152]

Turner RC, MUlns H, NeU HAW for the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insuhn dependent diabetes mellitus United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS 23). BMJ. 1998 316 823-828. [Pg.184]

Fihn SD, McDonell M, Martin D, Henikoff J, Vermes D, KentD, White RH, for the Warfarin Optimized Oupatient Follow-up Study Group. Risk factors for complications of chronic anticoagulation amulticQnXer study. Ann Intern Med (1993) 118,511-20. [Pg.362]

Zogg HA (1987) A brief introduction to the Zurich method of hazard analysis. Zurich Insurance Group, Risk Engineering... [Pg.437]

The outcome of a risk analysis is a combination of qualitative and quantitative results. Risk criteria are applied to support the assessment of the acceptability ofthe risk. High level risk criteria are expressed in form of societal risk, group risk or individual risk goals. In some industries, like the nuclear field, lower level system failure risk criteria are in use. [Pg.375]

Temporary Refuge Impairment Criteria (Group risk)... [Pg.378]

Although there is no specific requirement to estimate group risk, the assessment principles for offshore safety cases, HSE (2006a), indicates a need for a safety case to demonstrate temporary refuge (TR) integrity -this could be considered as a measure of societal risk. [Pg.378]

OECD/NEA WGRISK Probabilistic risk criteria. Working report of the Task group Probabilistic risk criteria of Working Group Risk OECD/NEA, Paris, March 2009 (draft)... [Pg.382]

Church MK, Maurer M, Simons FER, Bindslev-Jensen C, van Cauwenberge P, Bousquet J, Holgate ST, Zuberbier T ACCEPT-2 Study Group Risk of first-generation Hi-antihistamines a GA LEN position paper. Allergy 2010 65 459-66. [Pg.275]

Jacobs A, Kelly HW. CAMP Research Group. Risk of cataracts in the Childhood Asthma Management Program Cohort. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010 126(2) ... [Pg.284]

Group risk of an exposed population group, such as the workers on the plant or the members of the pubUc on a neaiby housing estate. [Pg.113]

Consider the risk graph and definitions developed above as they might be applied to the group risk of the workers on a given plwt. If we assume that on the plant there are 20 such functions, then, based on the geometric mean residual risk (1 in 1 million years), the total risk is 1 fatality in 50,000 years. [Pg.114]

If we estimate that this person is exposed to 10 hazards protected by SBFs (i.e. to half of the total of 20 assumed above), then, based on the geometric mean residual risk, his total risk of death from all of them is 1 in 1.5 million per year. This is 3.3% of our target of 1 in 50,000 per year IR for all hazards, which probably leaves more than adequate allowance for other hazards for which SDFs are not relevant. We might therefore conclude that this risk graph also is over-calibrated for the risks to our hypothetical most exposed individual, but we can choose to accept this additional element of conservatism. (Note that this is NOT the same risk graph as the one considered above for group risk, because, although we have retained the form, we have used a different set of definitions for the parameters.)... [Pg.116]

Both of these quantification approaches are presently being for group risk estimates. The U.S. EPA or various state risk assessors determine via the lEUBK model what percentages of children exposed to lead at a contamination site exceed some preselected threshold value indexed as a geometric mean PbB. The latter was extensively employed in the recent significant downward change in the U.S. primary and secondary NAAQS for lead from 1.5 to 0.15 Jig Pb/m (U.S. EPA, 2008). [Pg.798]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...