Other Atomization Methods

In addition to the above-discussed techniques, some other atomization methods have also been developed for specific applications. These include, for example, solution atomization, liquefied gas atomization, and spark-discharge atomization,[881 etc. 

Solution atomization involves dissolution of a relatively nonvolatile liquid (solute) in a volatile solvent and atomization of the solution. During the atomization, the solvent material will evaporate in surrounding medium (air), leaving only nucleus droplets of the nonvolatile solute. The final droplet size is a function of the initial droplet size, the mass concentration of the solute, and the density ratio of the solution to the solute. The limitation of this technique lies in that it requires the dissolution of the liquid to be dispersed in a solvent. 

A similar technique has been applied to the generation of monodisperse suspensions in water. This type of method was first used in medical field and then widely used to spray monodisperse solid particles such as polystyrene latex particles. Aerosols of solutes have also been produced by atomizing solutions of salt, sugar or methylene blue dye dissolved in water. In practical operations, a low concentration of solid particles in a solvent is recommended in order to avoid possible agglomeration of suspensions in the solvent. 

Sprays of fine droplets can be generated by first mixing a liquid with liquefied gas under pressure and then expanding the mixture through a nozzle. This technique, referred to ssliquefied gas atomization, has been used in many applications such as commercial aerosol cans. The mean droplet size generated with this technique is very small. In very few systematic studies, the measured droplet size distribution was found rather widely spread.[881 It is not clear, however, how the liquid amount, pressure, and nozzle design affect the mean droplet size and size distribution. 

Some design concepts for generating uniform droplets have been proposed by Lee et al.[88] These include (a) centrifugal type chamber, (b) atomization by two opposing air-liquid jets, and (c) spinning disk coupled with an ultrasonic field. Some other conceptions include (d) rocket nozzle chamber, (e) frozen particles, (f) rotating brush, and (g) periodic vibrations using saw-tooth waves, etc. 

---

Table 2.5. Comparison of Features of Other Atomization Methods for Melts 5 ...

Flame atomization is the most reproducible of all liquid-sample-inlroduclioii methods lhal have been developed ft>r altimic absorption and fluorescence spectrometry to dale. ITie sampling efficiency of other atomization methods and thus the sensilivily. however, are markedly heller than in flame atomization. There are two primary reasons for the lower sampling efficiency of the flame. First, a large portion of the sample flows down the drain. Second, the residence lime of individual atoms in the optical path in the flame is brief (--lO-s),... 

In most research studies on SP and SD in the lab scale, ultrasonic atomization has been used to generate droplets/sprays. To increase the powder production rate, other atomization methods should be examined without affecting the particle size, size distribution and quahty. For instance, a twin-fiuid atomization technique was used to produce lead zirconate titanate (PZT) powder using a starting soluticm composed of lead acetate, zirconium acetate, and titanium propoxide (stabilized by acetylacetone) dissolved in water by Nimmo et al. [19]. Commercialization of SP technique is closely interrelated to its throughput and strong evidence that SP is a suitable method for the production of some particular advanced powders. 

By fur. the most common sampic-inlroduclion and atomization techniques (or atomic absorption analyses are liamcs or electrothermal vaporizers. Several other atomization methods find occasional use, however. Three of these are described briefly in this section. 

A number of methods that provide information about the structure of a solid surface, its composition, and the oxidation states present have come into use. The recent explosion of activity in scanning probe microscopy has resulted in investigation of a wide variety of surface structures under a range of conditions. In addition, spectroscopic interrogation of the solid-high-vacuum interface elucidates structure and other atomic processes. 

One current limitation of orbital-free DFT is that since only the total density is calculated, there is no way to identify contributions from electronic states of a certain angular momentum character /. This identification is exploited in non-local pseudopotentials so that electrons of different / character see different potentials, considerably improving the quality of these pseudopotentials. The orbital-free metliods thus are limited to local pseudopotentials, connecting the quality of their results to the quality of tlie available local potentials. Good local pseudopotentials are available for the alkali metals, the alkaline earth metals and aluminium [100. 101] and methods exist for obtaining them for other atoms (see section VI.2 of [97]). 

Quantum chemical methods, exemplified by CASSCF and other MCSCF methods, have now evolved to an extent where it is possible to routinely treat accurately the excited electronic states of molecules containing a number of atoms. Mixed nuclear dynamics, such as swarm of trajectory based surface hopping or Ehrenfest dynamics, or the Gaussian wavepacket based multiple spawning method, use an approximate representation of the nuclear wavepacket based on classical trajectories. They are thus able to use the infoiination from quantum chemistry calculations required for the propagation of the nuclei in the form of forces. These methods seem able to reproduce, at least qualitatively, the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems. Test calculations have now been run using duect dynamics, and these show that even a small number of trajectories is able to produce useful mechanistic infomiation about the photochemistry of a system. In some cases it is even possible to extract some quantitative information. 

The chirality code of a molecule is based on atomic properties and on the 3D structure. Examples of atomic properties arc partial atomic charges and polarizabilities, which are easily accessible by fast empirical methods contained in the PETRA package. Other atomic properties, calculated by other methods, can in principle be used. It is convenient, however, if the chosen atomic property discriminates as much as possible between non-equivalent atoms. 3D molecular structures are easily generated by the GORINA software package (see Section 2.13), but other sources of 3D structures can be used as well. 

Daw M S and M I Baskes 1984. Embedded-atom Method Derivation and Application to Impurities, Surfaces, and Other Defects in Metals. Physical Review B29 6443-6453. 

Ire boundary element method of Kashin is similar in spirit to the polarisable continuum model, lut the surface of the cavity is taken to be the molecular surface of the solute [Kashin and lamboodiri 1987 Kashin 1990]. This cavity surface is divided into small boimdary elements, he solute is modelled as a set of atoms with point polarisabilities. The electric field induces 1 dipole proportional to its polarisability. The electric field at an atom has contributions from lipoles on other atoms in the molecule, from polarisation charges on the boundary, and where appropriate) from the charges of electrolytes in the solution. The charge density is issumed to be constant within each boundary element but is not reduced to a single )oint as in the PCM model. A set of linear equations can be set up to describe the electrostatic nteractions within the system. The solutions to these equations give the boundary element harge distribution and the induced dipoles, from which thermodynamic quantities can be letermined. 

The most commonly used semiempirical for describing PES s is the diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) method. This method uses a Hamiltonian with parameters for describing atomic and diatomic fragments within a molecule. The functional form, which is covered in detail by Tully, allows it to be parameterized from either ah initio calculations or spectroscopic results. The parameters must be fitted carefully in order for the method to give a reasonable description of the entire PES. Most cases where DIM yielded completely unreasonable results can be attributed to a poor fitting of parameters. Other semiempirical methods for describing the PES, which are discussed in the reviews below, are LEPS, hyperbolic map functions, the method of Agmon and Levine, and the mole-cules-in-molecules (MIM) method. 

MM methods are defined atom by atom. Thus, having a carbon atom without all its bonds does not have a significant affect on other atoms in the system. In contrast, QM calculations use a wave function that can incorporate second atom effects. An atom with a nonfilled valence will behave differently than with the valence filled. Because of this, the researcher must consider the way in which the QM portion of the calculation is truncated. 

Normally, you would expects all 2p orbitals in a given first row atom to be identical, regardless of their occupancy. This is only true when you perform calculations using Extended Hiickel. The orbitals derived from SCE calculations depend sensitively on their occupation. Eor example, the 2px, 2py, and 2pz orbitals are not degenerate for a CNDO calculation of atomic oxygen. This is especially important when you look at d orbital splittings in transition metals. To see a clear delineation between t2u and eg levels you must use EHT, rather than other semiempirical methods. 

Most potentiometric electrodes are selective for only the free, uncomplexed analyte and do not respond to complexed forms of the analyte. Solution conditions, therefore, must be carefully controlled if the purpose of the analysis is to determine the analyte s total concentration. On the other hand, this selectivity provides a significant advantage over other quantitative methods of analysis when it is necessary to determine the concentration of free ions. For example, calcium is present in urine both as free Ca + ions and as protein-bound Ca + ions. If a urine sample is analyzed by atomic absorption spectroscopy, the signal is proportional to the total concentration of Ca +, since both free and bound calcium are atomized. Analysis with a Ca + ISE, however, gives a signal that is a function of only free Ca + ions since the protein-bound ions cannot interact with the electrode s membrane. 

In the examples, a nitro group is substituted for a hydrogen atom, and water is a by-product. Nitro groups may, however, be substituted for other atoms or groups of atoms. In Victor Meyer reactions which use silver nitrite, the nitro group replaces a hahde atom, eg, I or Br. In a modification of this method, sodium nitrite dissolved in dimethyl formamide or other suitable solvent is used instead of silver nitrite (1). Nitro compounds can also be produced by addition reactions, eg, the reaction of nitric acid or nitrogen dioxide with unsaturated compounds such as olefins or acetylenes. 

Numerous methods have been pubUshed for the determination of trace amounts of tellurium (33—42). Instmmental analytical methods (qv) used to determine trace amounts of tellurium include atomic absorption spectrometry, flame, graphite furnace, and hydride generation inductively coupled argon plasma optical emission spectrometry inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry neutron activation analysis and spectrophotometry (see Mass spectrometry Spectroscopy, optical). Other instmmental methods include polarography, potentiometry, emission spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction, and x-ray fluorescence. 

Instrumental Quantitative Analysis. Methods such as x-ray spectroscopy, oaes, and naa do not necessarily require pretreatment of samples to soluble forms. Only reUable and verified standards are needed. Other instmmental methods that can be used to determine a wide range of chromium concentrations are atomic absorption spectroscopy (aas), flame photometry, icap-aes, and direct current plasma—atomic emission spectroscopy (dcp-aes). These methods caimot distinguish the oxidation states of chromium, and speciation at trace levels usually requires a previous wet-chemical separation. However, the instmmental methods are preferred over (3)-diphenylcarbazide for trace chromium concentrations, because of the difficulty of oxidizing very small quantities of Cr(III). 

In this work, a method based on the reduction potential of ascorbic acid was developed for the sensitive detennination of trace of this compound. In this method ascorbic acid was added on the Cr(VI) solution to reduced that to Cr(III). Cr(III) produced in solution was quantitatively separated from the remainder of Cr(VI). The conditions were optimized for efficient extraction of Cr(III). The extracted Cr(III) was finally mineralized with nitric acid and sensitively analyzed by electro-thermal atomic absorption spectrometry. The determinations were carried out on a Varian AA-220 atomic absolution equipped with a GTA-110 graphite atomizer. The results obtained by this method were compared with those obtained by the other reported methods and it was cleared that the proposed method is more precise and able to determine the trace of ascorbic acid. Table shows the results obtained from the determination of ascorbic acid in two real samples by the proposed method and the spectrometric method based on reduction of Fe(III). 

Other excellent methods of phase identification include TEM and electron diffraction. These may be more useful for low-Z materials, ultrathin films, and for characterizing small areas, including individual grains. For multiphase films with incomplete texture, these methods and XRD are complementary, since in commonly used geometries, they probe atomic planes perpendicular and parallel to the thin film surface, respectively. 

N. F. Ramsey (Harvard) invention of the separated oscillatory fields method and its use in the hydrogen maser and other atomic clocks. 

The properties of polymers depend not only on overall chain length, but also on the degree to which the monomers are ordered along the chain. Different methods of preparation lead to vastly different degrees of ordering. A good example is found in the polymerization of propylene. This polymerizes predominantly head-to-tail , and leads to a stereocenter ( ) at every other atom in the polymer chain. 

This simple calculation has not taken into consideration any possible effects arising from other atoms in the molecule. More sophisticated methods of calculation which take account of these interactions have been developed but are outside the scope of this book and students should consult other appropriate texts35 if they wish to study the theory of the subject further. 

---