D-orbitals splitting

A different d orbital splitting results and the absorption now results in a deep blue colour ... 

The d orbital splitting depends on the oxidation state of a given ion hence twb complex ions with the same shape, ligands and coordination number can differ in colour, for example... 

Normally, you would expects all 2p orbitals in a given first row atom to be identical, regardless of their occupancy. This is only true when you perform calculations using Extended Hiickel. The orbitals derived from SCE calculations depend sensitively on their occupation. Eor example, the 2px, 2py, and 2pz orbitals are not degenerate for a CNDO calculation of atomic oxygen. This is especially important when you look at d orbital splittings in transition metals. To see a clear delineation between t2u and eg levels you must use EHT, rather than other semiempirical methods. 

Perhaps only slightly less common than octahedral symmetry is tetrahedral symmetry. We now examine the d orbital splitting in this environment. The story is much the same as above, except that it is now convenient to place the four point charges of the tetrahedron as shown in Fig. 3-6. Here ligands are put at alternate... 

Thus, the ligand-stabilized d-orbital splitting pattern is qualitatively consistent with the expectation of crystal-field theory, but the physical origin of this splitting should be attributed to attractive donor-acceptor interactions such as (4.86b) rather than to any inherent electrostatic repulsions toward the incoming ligands. More accurate treatment of the spectroscopic 10Dq value should, of course, be based on separate consideration of the two spectroscopic states. 

To describe the d-orbital splitting effect for the octahedral field, one should imagine ligand spheres of electron density approaching along the x, y, and z axes, where the dxi yi and di lobes of electron density point. Figure 1.5 illustrates representations of high-probability electron orbit surfaces for the five d orbitals. 

Figure 2.5 Crystal field d-orbital splitting diagrams for common geometries.

Given the typical d-orbital splitting for tetrahedral and octahedral environments this leads to three different regimes for the energy change when Mn... 

Fig. 3. Octahedral d-orbital splitting diagram from which the one-electron contribution to the LFSE can be computed.

How will the d orbitals split in a trigonal bipyramidal environment Using a crystal field (pure point charge) model, determine what the relative energies of the orbitals will be. 

Although crystal field theory quite successfully rationalizes observed structures of the spinels of the first transition series, it must be applied with care to other examples. In comparing structures in which other factors (ionic radii, covalency, etc.) are more dissimilar, d orbital splittings alone generally do not explain the observations. In these cases, a broader analysis is required. 

As indicated earlier, a difficulty immediately arises the evaluation of the parts of the matrix elements (equation 4) involving terms containing r using free-ion d wave functions gives results which are obviously grossly in error. Consequently, there is not likely to be any relationship between the parameters such as developed in cubic symmetry the low symmetry cases involve (at least) three parameters to describe the d-orbital splitting pattern. 

---