Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Weapons, nuclear

The more recently constructed COMBAS device at the JINR at Dubna, Russia has a significantly larger acceptance and is based on using combined function magnets. The A1200 (now retired) and the A1900(MSU) (shown schematically in Fig. 14.14), RCNP(Osaka), and FRS(GSl) separators are positioned at the beginning of the beam distribution system to allow delivery of radioactive beams to any experimental area. [Pg.421]

While a full discussion of nuclear weapons is beyond the scope of this book, some comments about the operating principles of such devices and their connection to reactors and accelerators are desirable. [Pg.421]

The techniques used to produce a nuclear explosion (i.e., an essentially instantaneous, self-perpetuating nuclear chain reaction) are very complex. A nuclear explosion must utilize a high-energy neutron spectrum (fast neutrons, that is, neutrons with energies 1 MeV). This results basically from the fact that, for an explosion to take place, the nuclear chain reaction must be very rapid—of the order of microseconds. Each generation in the chain reaction must occur within [Pg.421]

The second method makes use of the fact that when a subcritical quantity of an appropriate isotope, that is, 239Pu (or 235U), is strongly compressed, it can become critical or supercritical. The reason for this is that compressing the fissionable material, that is, increasing its density increases the rate of production of neutrons by fission relative to the rate of loss by escape. The surface area (or neutron escape area) is decreased, while the mass (upon which the rate of propagation of fission depends) remains constant. A self-sustaining chain reaction may then become possible with the same mass that was subcritical in the uncompressed state. [Pg.423]

In a fission weapon, the compression may be achieved by encompassing the subcritical material with a shell of chemical high explosives, which is imploded by means of a number of external detonators, so that a uniform inwardly directed implosion wave is produced. The implosion wave creates overpressures of millions of pounds per square inch in the core of the weapon, increasing the density by a factor of 2. A simple estimate may be made to show that the resulting [Pg.423]


Pu (86 years) is formed from Np. Pu is separated by selective oxidation and solvent extraction. The metal is formed by reduction of PuF with calcium there are six crystal forms. Pu is used in nuclear weapons and reactors Pu is used as a nuclear power source (e.g. in space exploration). The ionizing radiation of plutonium can be a health hazard if the material is inhaled. [Pg.318]

Plutonium has assumed the position of dominant importance among the trasuranium elements because of its successful use as an explosive ingredient in nuclear weapons and the place which it holds as a key material in the development of industrial use of nuclear power. One kilogram is equivalent to about 22 million kilowatt hours of heat energy. The complete detonation of a kilogram of plutonium produces an explosion equal to about 20,000 tons of chemical explosive. [Pg.204]

Linus Pauling is portrayed on this 1977 Volta stamp The chemical formulas depict the two resonance forms of ben zene and the explosion in the background symbolizes Pauling s efforts to limit the testing of nuclear weapons... [Pg.3]

Linus Pauling (1901-1994) was born in Portland Ore gon and was educated at Oregon State University and at the California Institute of Technology where he earned a Ph D in chemistry in 1925 In addition to re search in bonding theory Pauling studied the structure of proteins and was awarded the Nobel Prize in chemistry for that work in 1954 Paul ing won a second Nobel Prize (the Peace Prize) in 1962 for his efforts to limit the testing of nuclear weapons He was one of only four scientists to have won two Nobel Prizes The first double winner was a woman Can you name her" ... [Pg.15]

Plutonium (Pu) is an artificial element of atomic number 94 that has its main radioactive isotopes at 2 °Pu and Pu. The major sources of this element arise from the manufacture and detonation of nuclear weapons and from nuclear reactors. The fallout from detonations and discharges of nuclear waste are the major sources of plutonium contamination of the environment, where it is trapped in soils and plant or animal life. Since the contamination levels are generally very low, a sensitive technique is needed to estimate its concentration. However, not only the total amount can be estimated. Measurement of the isotope ratio provides information about its likely... [Pg.369]

S. Glasstone, ed.. The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Supt. of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (USGPO), Washington, D.C., 1962. [Pg.26]

Whereas new appHcations of lithium compounds were developed, commercial growth was slow. In 1953 worldwide sales of lithium products, expressed as lithium carbonate, were only ca 1000 metric tons (2). In 1954 the U.S. lithium industry underwent a sudden, very large expansion when the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission required large amounts of lithium hydroxide [1310-65-2] for its nuclear weapons program (see Nuclearreactors). Three domestic producers built 4500-t/yr plants to meet contract commitments with the U.S. government. When these government contracts ended in 1960, capacity exceeded demand and several operations were discontinued. [Pg.220]

Nuclear wastes are classified according to the level of radioactivity. Low level wastes (LLW) from reactors arise primarily from the cooling water, either because of leakage from fuel or activation of impurities by neutron absorption. Most LLW will be disposed of in near-surface faciHties at various locations around the United States. Mixed wastes are those having both a ha2ardous and a radioactive component. Transuranic (TRU) waste containing plutonium comes from chemical processes related to nuclear weapons production. These are to be placed in underground salt deposits in New Mexico (see... [Pg.181]

HEU De-Enrichment. Highly enriched uranium (HEU), initially enriched to >93% U, for use in research, naval reactors, and nuclear weapons, may be de-enriched and fabricated into fuel for civihan nuclear reactors. An estimate of the world inventory of highly enriched uranium in the nuclear weapons states is provided in Table 6 (34). [Pg.188]

An agreement between the United States and Russia led to a commitment in 1994 by the United States to buy 500 metric tons of Russian HEU, which has been converted to low enriched uranium (LEU). The HEU must come from dismanded nuclear weapons before it is converted to LEU. The sale of converted HEU to the United States is to be carried out on a timetable in which no less than 10 t are to be converted in each of the first five years of the agreement and no less than 30 t in each year thereafter (35). In all, the agreement would last for 20 years if only these minimums were sold each year. [Pg.188]

The amount of HEU that becomes avadable for civdian use through the 1990s and into the twenty-first century depends on the number of warheads removed from nuclear arsenals and the amount of HEU in the weapons complex that is already outside of the warheads, ie, materials stockpdes and spent naval reactor fuels. An illustrative example of the potential amounts of weapons-grade materials released from dismanded nuclear weapons is presented in Table 7 (36). Using the data in Table 7, a reduction in the number of warheads in nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia to 5000 warheads for each country results in a surplus of 1140 t of HEU. This inventory of HEU is equivalent to 205,200 t of natural uranium metal, or approximately 3.5 times the 1993 annual demand for natural uranium equivalent. [Pg.188]

The recycle weapons fuel cycle rehes on the reservoir of SWUs and yellow cake equivalents represented by the fissile materials in decommissioned nuclear weapons. This variation impacts the prereactor portion of the fuel cycle. The post-reactor portion can be either classical or throwaway. Because the avadabihty of weapons-grade fissile material for use as an energy source is a relatively recent phenomenon, it has not been fully implemented. As of early 1995 the United States had purchased highly enriched uranium from Russia, and France had initiated a modification and expansion of the breeder program to use plutonium as the primary fuel (3). AH U.S. reactor manufacturers were working on designs to use weapons-grade plutonium as fuel. [Pg.202]

The neutrons in a research reactor can be used for many types of scientific studies, including basic physics, radiological effects, fundamental biology, analysis of trace elements, material damage, and treatment of disease. Neutrons can also be dedicated to the production of nuclear weapons materials such as plutonium-239 from uranium-238 and tritium, H, from lithium-6. Alternatively, neutrons can be used to produce radioisotopes for medical diagnosis and treatment, for gamma irradiation sources, or for heat energy sources in space. [Pg.210]

Chemical processing or reprocessing (39) of the fuel to extract the plutonium and uranium left a residue of radioactive waste, which was stored in underground tanks. By 1945, the reactors had produced enough plutonium for two nuclear weapons. One was tested at Alamogordo, New Mexico, in July 1945 the other was dropped at Nagasaki in August 1945. [Pg.212]

Transuranic Waste. Transuranic wastes (TRU) contain significant amounts (>3,700 Bq/g (100 nCi/g)) of plutonium. These wastes have accumulated from nuclear weapons production at sites such as Rocky Flats, Colorado. Experimental test of TRU disposal is planned for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site near Carlsbad, New Mexico. The geologic medium is rock salt, which has the abiUty to flow under pressure around waste containers, thus sealing them from water. Studies center on the stabiUty of stmctures and effects of small amounts of water within the repository. [Pg.232]

Other fuel besides that from U.S. commercial reactors may be disposed of in the ultimate repository. PossibiUties are spent fuel from defense reactors and fuel from research reactors outside of the United States. To reduce the proliferation of nuclear weapons, the United States has urged that research reactors reduce fuel enrichment in uranium-235 from around 90 to 20%. The latter fuel could not be used in a weapon. The United States has agreed to accept spent fuel from these reactors. [Pg.232]

Another safety issue to be considered which might be exacerbated in the reprocessing option is that the plutonium generated in power reactors, called reactor-grade plutonium because it is made up of a variety of plutonium isotopes, contains plutonium-241, which is subject to spontaneous fission (8). The mixture of isotopes makes it extremely difficult to build an effective nuclear weapon. However, an explosive device could be built using this mixture if control of detonation is sacrificed (48). [Pg.242]

Most modem projectiles and virtually all missiles contain explosives. The plasmas that result from explosives are intrinsic to operation of warheads, bombs, mines, and related devices. Nuclear weapons and plasmas are intimately related. Plasmas are an inevitable result of the detonation of fission and fusion devices and are fundamental to the operation of fusion devices. Compressed pellets, in which a thermonuclear reaction occurs, would be useful militarily for simulation of the effects of nuclear weapons on materials and devices. [Pg.117]

Much of the world s separated plutonium has been used for nuclear weapons (Table 1). It is probable that 5 kg or less of Pu is used in most of the fission, fusion, and thermonuclear-boosted fission weapons (2). Weapons-grade plutonium requires a content of >95 wt% Pu for maximum efficiency. Much plutonium does not have this purity. [Pg.191]

In plutonium-fueled breeder power reactors, more plutonium is produced than is consumed (see Nuclearreactors, reactor types). Thus the utilisa tion of plutonium as a nuclear energy or weapon source is especially attractive to countries that do not have uranium-enrichment faciUties. The cost of a chemical reprocessing plant for plutonium production is much less than that of a uranium-235 enrichment plant (see Uranium and uranium compounds). Since the end of the Cold War, the potential surplus of Pu metal recovered from the dismantling of nuclear weapons has presented a large risk from a security standpoint. [Pg.191]

Cost and Value of Plutonium. The cost of building all U.S. nuclear weapons has been estimated as 378 biUion in 1995 dollars (24). If half of this sum is attributed to U.S. weapons-grade plutonium production (- lOOt), the cost is 1.9 x 10 /kg of weapons-grade Pu. Some nuclear weapons materials (Be, enriched U, Pu) also have value as a clandestine or terrorist commodity. The economic value of reactor-grade plutonium as a fuel for electric power-producing reactors has depended in the past on the economic value of pure 235u... [Pg.193]

It has been estimated that 1.3 x 10 Bq of Pu has been released to the environment from atmospheric detonation of nuclear weapons that... [Pg.204]

Some of the heavy radioisotopes, namely those of uranium and plutonium, are used as the fuel ia nuclear reactors (qv) which are used by commercial power companies to produce electricity. These radioisotopes have also been used as the critical components ia nuclear weapons. [Pg.442]

When the NRC, headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, took over the responsibiUties of the AEC in 1974, many of the AEC s research and development functions, particularly many covering new technology development and nuclear weapons production, were assumed by the U.S. Department of Energy. However, the NRC has maintained some research and developmental capabiUties which are handled by the NRC s Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research. [Pg.92]

The NRC also imposes special security requirements for spent fuel shipments and transport of highly enriched uranium or plutonium materials that can be used in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. These security measures include route evaluation, escort personnel and vehicles, communications capabiHties, and emergency plans. State governments are notified in advance of any planned shipment within their state of spent fuel, or any other radioactive materials requiring shipment in accident-proof. Type B containers. [Pg.92]

Uranium-235 Enrichment. The enrichment of uranium is expressed as the weight percent of in uranium. For natural uranium the enrichment level is 0.72%. Many appHcations of uranium requite enrichment levels above 0.72%, such as nuclear reactor fuel (56,57). Normally for lightwater nuclear reactors (LWR), the 0.72% natural abundance of is enriched to 2—5% (9,58). There are special cases such as materials-testing reactors, high flux isotope reactors, compact naval reactors, or nuclear weapons where enrichment of 96—97% is used. [Pg.321]

Uranium hexafluoride [7783-81-5], UF, is an extremely corrosive, colorless, crystalline soHd, which sublimes with ease at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. The complex can be obtained by multiple routes, ie, fluorination of UF [10049-14-6] with F2, oxidation of UF with O2, or fluorination of UO [1344-58-7] by F2. The hexafluoride is monomeric in nature having an octahedral geometry. UF is soluble in H2O, CCl and other chlorinated hydrocarbons, is insoluble in CS2, and decomposes in alcohols and ethers. The importance of UF in isotopic enrichment and the subsequent apphcations of uranium metal cannot be overstated. The U.S. government has approximately 500,000 t of UF stockpiled for enrichment or quick conversion into nuclear weapons had the need arisen (57). With the change in pohtical tides and the downsizing of the nation s nuclear arsenal, debates over releasing the stockpiles for use in the production of fuel for civiUan nuclear reactors continue. [Pg.332]

Hazards Ahead Managing Cleanup Worker Health and Safety at the Nuclear Weapons Complex. U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment. Washington, DC U.S. Government Printing Office, 1993, pp. 3, 13. [Pg.11]

Department of Defense - requires that a PSA be performed according to MIL-STD-882A for any major acllvity or undertaking, e.g., analyses of the transportation of nuclear weapons and deactivatioti of chemical weapons. [Pg.17]


See other pages where Weapons, nuclear is mentioned: [Pg.648]    [Pg.691]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.1126]    [Pg.2283]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.2]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.73 , Pg.96 , Pg.100 , Pg.109 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.9 , Pg.10 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.54 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.131 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.242 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.363 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.217 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.235 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.192 , Pg.262 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.54 , Pg.106 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.7 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.262 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.138 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.209 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.74 , Pg.75 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.94 , Pg.117 , Pg.279 , Pg.416 , Pg.487 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.72 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.2 , Pg.74 , Pg.75 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.114 , Pg.175 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 , Pg.25 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 , Pg.21 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.100 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.641 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.934 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.5 , Pg.18 , Pg.24 , Pg.41 , Pg.71 , Pg.79 , Pg.96 , Pg.124 , Pg.165 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.297 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.266 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.928 , Pg.929 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 , Pg.138 , Pg.169 , Pg.212 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.351 ]




SEARCH



Assembly, nuclear weapons

Atomic bomb Nuclear weapons

Explosives nuclear weapons

Gases, radioactive nuclear weapons

Non-proliferation of nuclear weapons

Nuclear Fission Weapons and Ammunition

Nuclear Weapons Technology

Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy

Nuclear Weapons case

Nuclear combined weapons

Nuclear fission weapons

Nuclear fusion weapons

Nuclear warheads/weapons

Nuclear weapon materials

Nuclear weapon states

Nuclear weapon tests

Nuclear weapon tests environments

Nuclear weapon tests, atmospheric

Nuclear weapons Szilard

Nuclear weapons Teller

Nuclear weapons development

Nuclear weapons disarmament

Nuclear weapons dismantling

Nuclear weapons energy release

Nuclear weapons fallout from

Nuclear weapons flexible response

Nuclear weapons hydrogen bomb

Nuclear weapons policy

Nuclear weapons possession

Nuclear weapons production

Nuclear weapons prohibition

Nuclear weapons supercritical mass

Nuclear weapons tactical

Nuclear weapons test fallout

Nuclear weapons test, characterization

Nuclear weapons testing

Nuclear weapons testing in the

Nuclear weapons testing, radionuclides from

Nuclear weapons, cessation

Nuclear weapons, cessation atmospheric testing

Nuclear weapons, countries possessing

Nuclear weapons, explosions

Nuclear weapons, explosions Nuclei

Nuclear weapons, hazards

Nuclear weapons, stolen

Past Nuclear Weapons Tests

Possession of nuclear weapons

Production of nuclear weapons

Proliferation chemical Weapons, nuclear

Radiation nuclear weapons

Radioactive particles from nuclear weapons

Radioactive wastes from nuclear weapons production

Radioactive wastes nuclear weapon tests, fallout from

Radiological-nuclear weapons

Resistance against nuclear weapons

Safety nuclear weapons

Testing of Nuclear Weapons

Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

Tritium nuclear fusion weapons

Types of Nuclear Weapons

Underwater nuclear weapons

United States nuclear weapons stockpile

Weapons, conventional nuclear

Weapons, nuclear proliferation

© 2024 chempedia.info