Nuclear hazards

According to DOE-STD-1027-92, the level of hazard analysis required for a nuclear facility SAR is determined by the facility s nuclear hazard classification as follows. 

Though this book is primarily intended for scientists, engineers and technicians concerned with the challenges of decommissioning nuclear-hazardous objects, we do hope it will be also found interesting and useful by specialists involved - in one way or another - into development and implementation of standard, managerial and engineering documents and decisions on the problems under consideration. 

Nuclear hazard due to fissile materials contained therein ... 

From the environmental and engineering standpoint, storage of three-RC units is more advantageous option as compared to that of non-dismantled NSs one needs by far less servicing, no crew on board, no nuclear hazard thanks to SNF imloading and... 

The measures to be taken under the Project will ensure environmental safety in the region thanks to transfer of the above-class NSs from the nuclear-hazardous category to the radiation-hazardous one followed by their dismantlement and thus elimination of the risk of unauthorized sinking. 

In compliance with the CMB Rehabilitation Concept , the ultimate goal of SNF management consists in SNF removal from TSF to Mayak for reprocessing. This would exclude both the necessity of performing subsequent nuclear hazard assessment at the site and diminish the radiation hazard of all other works at TSF. However, as follows from the above-said, for that purpose the following tasks should be resolved (or conditions be created) ... 

US Environmental Protection Agency, Treatment standards for hazardous debris, 40CFR Part 268.45,1994. American Society for Testing of Materials, Standard test methods for determining chemical durability of nuclear, hazardous, and mixed waste glasses the product consistency test, ASTM C 1285-97, 1997. American Nuclear Society, American National Standard Measurement of the leachabiUty in solidified low-level radioactive wastes by a short term test procedure, Method ANSl/ANS 16.1-1986, 1986. 

E. Nuclear Hazards Training Course. Offered by Defense Special Weapons Agency. 

References FM 3-3-1 (detailed explanation of burst determination and avoidance of high level nuclear hazards), FM 8-9 (Part I), and FM 8-10-7 (Chapter 2). 

NUCLEAR HAZARD CATEGORY 3 FACILITIES. Minimal hazard and accident analyses are required. PrHA should provide information to the safety analysis on release mechanisms, engineering analysis, and consequence analysis. 

NUCLEAR HAZARD CATEGORY 2 FACILITIES. This category requires use of one of several analytical methods for developing qualitative accident scenarios. The choices are generally compatible with the requirements of the PSM Rule. If the PSM Rule requirements for PrHAs are met, the resulting analysis should significantly contribute to the analysis required under the DOE-STD-1027-92 for release mechanisms. However, analyses beyond PSM Rule requirements may be needed to comply with other SAR requirements for Nuclear Hazard Category 2 Facilities. 

NUCLEAR HAZARD CATEGORY 1 FACILITIES. Fault tree/eveut tree analyses are required if the facility is a large reactor. If the facility is not a reactor and a PSM Rule PrHA is required, the analyses can be conducted as described for Nuclear Hazard Category 2 Facilities. Different systems or processes within the facility may be analyzed using different methods. For example, HAZOP studies may be used as the PrHA method for processes that contain chemical hazards. Fault tree/event tree analyses may be used to analyze systems that do not need to comply with the PSM Rule. 

Assessment of reliability of nuclear safety measures, spontaneous chain reaction (SCR) risk and consequences in the nuclear dangerous areas, plants, and during transportation of nuclear hazardous fissile materials ... 

Performance of expert review and the consent process with the manager of the service responsible for engineering decisions related to a change in technology and the intended function of equipment in sectors where there is a nuclear hazard ... 

Personnel employed in sectors where there is a nuclear hazard receive instruction, have their knowledge tested, and participate in accident prevention and control training sessions according to the requirements of the Basic Industry Regulations. (PBYa-06-00-96) and industry safety regulations. 

Similar to the Final Safety Analysis Report in the U.S., a frmdamental feature of the British regulatory system is the requirement for each licensee to demonstrate the safety of its proposed operation in a document known as the safety case. The Nil also enforces safety and health regulations related to non-nuclear hazards at licensed sites. This role is perhaps comparable with those of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and state safety and health authorities. The relationship between the U.K. licensees and the safety authorities is generally less antagonistic than that found in the U.S. The majority of discrepancies found by Nil inspectors are addressed at the individual... 

The Process Standards are mandatory written Instructions prepared by an Independent component having no line responsibility for reactor operation or production efficiencies. The Process Standards specify for the reactor process and vital auxiliary plants the limits materials procedures equipment and frequency of functional checks where such specification Is necessary to safeguard agednst nuclear hazards. 

Methods, procedures, and check lists for process operations with nuclear hazard potential eu e prepcured to ensure that execution of maintenance work, process functions, inspections, functional tests of critical equipment, reactor startup preparations, and reactor operations are conducted In accordance with Process Standards and Equipment Maintenance Standards. Special operating and maintenance procedures are provided for in-reactor test facilities. 

The site plan concept provides an overall view of plants requiring safety inspection and establishing an early warning system for possible changes of use or process. Within this general control, detailed controls may be elaborated. If it is desired to Introduce a new plant on the site, a more detailed plant specification must then be produced. This specification must indicate the type of process to be introduced, the nature of the materials to be processed, the nature and volume of likely wastes, the main nuclear hazards, aiid a Design Safety Report, which is a statement of the principles and means for the control of safety. This information must be submitted to the Inspectorate before the licensee begins to construct the new plant on his site. 

A preliminary hazeurds review of the N Reactor was published In January 1958. At that tlme the design concept had not been fully developed and detailed design had not been started. The preliminary review, therefore, was general In nature and served mainly to Isolate charaoteristlc nuclear hazards associated with reactors of the general type ot the New Production Reactor (N-Reactor) being built at Hanford. 

Calculations have been performed for all design basis accidents the results show their scenarios do not progress into conditions posing a nuclear hazard and do not lead to exceeding the permissible limits for the equipment. 

With regard to the CPS design, such an accident is hypothetical and its probability is practically negligible but, as it is the gravest of all conceivable reactivity-initiated accidents, its consequences actually define the nuclear hazard limit of the plant. 

The majority of the plant, materials and buildings that are to be dismantled in this period are not radioactive. Conventional dismantling techniques can therefore be used but their application needs to be controlled and carefully assessed before implementation to ensure there are no consequent radiological implications, eg as a result of the work being done in a radiation area or because of unexpected radioactive contamination being found. The removal of inactive plant and materials can also involve non-nuclear hazards that need precautions to be taken. For example, a major task on the stations has been to remove thermal insulation materials that have been predominantly asbestos based. 

There is increasing current concern about safety from nuclear hazards, including nuclear blasts and radiation. There will be greater involvement in protecting people against such hazards. A nuclear shelter is just one of many ideas to protect and shield a person from the effects of nuclear explosions. These structures can range from a deep buried rigid structure to a concrete framed box covered with soil. 

CBRN An abbreviation for chemicals, biological agents, and radioactive and nuclear hazards. 

Nuclear hazards. The Chernobyl disaster is a continuing example of transport of radioactive corrosion products in water, fatal to human, animal and biological life. 

Consequences of iodine deficiency in Europe in relation to nuclear hazards... 

Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Hazards An Overview and Comparison... 

---