Laboratory evaluation routine laboratories

In the ED setting, the diagnosis of ketamine intoxication is a clinical one. Ketamine is not routinely detected by urine toxicology tests, although it can be detected with high-performance liquid chromatography (Koesters et al. 2002). As with MDMA, the initial assessment for ketamine intoxication includes the use of routine laboratory tests to detect electrolyte abnormalities and to evaluate renal and hepatic functioning (Koesters et al. 2002). 

Hypertension caused by any of these conditions is referred to as secondary hypertension. Identification of a secondary cause of hypertension is often not initially pursued unless suggested by routine clinical and laboratory evaluation of the patient, or failure to achieve blood pressure control. 

Common causes of insomnia are shown in Table 72-2. In patients with chronic disturbances, a diagnostic evaluation includes physical and mental status examinations, routine laboratory tests, and medication and substance abuse histories. 

In preliminary clinical trials, 2 of 2,796 mirtazapine-treated patients developed agranulocytosis, and 1 developed severe neutropenia. All 3 patients recovered after medication discontinuation, and other possible etiologies were present in at least 1 of these individuals. Thirteen patients with pretreatment neutropenia did develop more severe neutropenia or agranulocytosis. Postmarketing evaluation to date has not established a causal relation between mirtazapine and agranulocytosis. Routine laboratory monitoring is not currently recommended. 

The EPA recommends that the control limits of 70-130 percent be used as interim acceptance criteria until the laboratory develops its own limits (EPA, 1996a). In reality, not every laboratory evaluates their analytical precision and accuracy statistically many rely on the EPA guidance or choose control limits arbitrarily. The typical arbitrary control limits are 50-150 percent these limits are sufficiently wide to encompass the recoveries of most organic analytes. As a rule, the control limits of 65-135 percent reflect the typical laboratory accuracy for most organic analytes for metals these limits are 75-125 percent. The arbitrary control limits do not reflect the actual laboratory performance and their routine use is an unacceptable laboratory... 

At present no MS manufacturer can offer complete solutions that meet the high analytical demands of a routine laboratory performing LC-MS/MS analytes. None of the mass spectrometers, let alone the complex LC-MS/MS instrument combination, is certified according to the in vitro diagnostic directive (IVDD) 98/79/EC of the European Community ( CE certified ) or FDA approved. Generally there is no bidirectional connection of the MS control and evaluation software to the laboratory s electronic data processing. The use of self-generated scripts for the transmission of work lists to the MS or for retransmission of the measured values continues to be common practice. With few exceptions (IVD-CE certified assays by some providers) the manufacture of consumables (mobile solvents, precipitants) is still in the hands of the local laboratory. 

This method is currently being used for routine laboratory analysis of red pepper heat. Results have been consistent and continue to correlate well with HPLC data. A similar procedure has also been used for sensory evaluation of black pepper heat. The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM, Committee E-18) has conducted a collaborative study testing the new method in comparison to the Scoville Method. ASTM E-18 is currently preparing to document it as a standardized test method. Also, a modification of the method is being prepared for oleoresin capsicum and for low-heat capsicums. 

Physical examination, routine laboratory tests, and chest roentgenogram were unremarkable. Testicular function as evaluated clinically and by the measurement of serum androgens, FSH, LH, and sperm count were normal in all patients. Zinc status as assessed by the determination of zinc concentration in plasma, erythrocytes, and hair was within normal limits. 

During the 1960s further improvements made infrared spectroscopy a very useful tool used worldwide in the analytical routine laboratory as well as in many fields of science. Grating spectrometers replaced the prism instruments due to their larger optical conductance (which is explained in Sec. 3 of this book). The even larger optical conductance of interferometers could be employed after computers became available in the laboratory and algorithms which made Fourier transformation of interferograms into spectra a routine. The computers which became a necessary component of the spectrometers made new powerful methods of evaluation possible, such as spectral subtraction and library search. 

If not done routinely, clinical laboratory diagnostic evaluations should be considered any time fungal keratitis is suspected. More routine methods of laboratory evaluation yield no positive results. 

The data were assessed by the ISO 5725-2 protocol [3] implemented in the software package Prolab98 (Dr Uhlig, Quo Data, Dresden, Germany), which is routinely used by the German Federal Environmental Agency for evaluation of laboratory proficiency tests. Outliers were rejected by use of Grubbs test (P=l%) and Cochran s test (P=l%). 

Because the initial bronchitis following respiratory exposure is not infectious, patients will not benefit from administration of antibiotics. However, routine laboratory evaluation shonld include daily sputum cultures. Within the first several days after exposure, patients may develop a chemical pnenmonitis, reflected by fever, elevated white blood cell connts and pulmonary infiltrates, bnt this pnenmonitis is typically sterile. An infectious etiology is uncommon until the third or fourth day after exposure. Patients should receive antibiotics only after identification of a causative organism, not prophylactically (8,25,26). Patients with pnlmonary edema should not receive diuretics, because vesicant-caused pulmonary edema is not cardiogenic (3). 

Specifications should be so carefully described that another investigator can reproduce the study and the user of reference values can evaluate their comparability with values obtained with the methods used for producing the patient s values in a routine laboratory. To ensure comparability between reference values and observed values, the same analytical method should be used. 

The proteins most amenable to routine laboratory evaluation die those in blood, urine, CSF amniotic fluid, saliva, feces, and peritoneal or pleural fluids. With few exceptions, the proteins found in all of these are derived from blood plasma. The following discussion is limited to (1) the most abundant plasma proteins, (2) changes of their concentrations in the most accessible body fluids, and (3) a few of the analytical techniques used to measure them. 

Clark, G.M. A statistical and clinical evaluation of fingerstick and routine laboratory prothrombin time measurements. Pharmacotherapy 1997, 17 (5), 861-866. 

Finally, the scarce motivation of laboratories in the validation and external performance evaluation of SMETs also has to be mentioned. This may be due to the fact that these methods are not yet extensively applied in monitoring and that the Directives usually do not clearly suggest their application in monitoring. SMETs are applied in research laboratories, but not in routine laboratories. If the Directives included the possibility of the application of these methods in monitoring, it would certainly contribute to a rapid and diffuse spread of SMETs outside the academic world. 

The patient history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests are extremely useful in establishing a diagnosis, but frequently a more specific study is required to confirm or disprove a clinical suspicion. The most appropriate diagnostic test depends on the anatomic region involved, the suspected abnormality, patient preference, the patient s overall condition, and clinical manifestations of the patient. The next sections outline the most frequently used diagnostic studies and procedures and their roles in evaluating the GI tract. 

Chronic insomnia is frequently associated with a psychiatric or medical condition, and individuals with such a complaint should receive a complete diagnostic examination. This evaluation should include routine laboratory tests and physical and mental stams examinations, as well as ruling out any medication- or substance-related causes." Common causes of insomnia are listed in Table 71-2. 

It is important to establish baseline laboratory values and imaging studies. Routine laboratory evaluation includes complete blood... 

Examination of the urine is the cornerstone of laboratory evaluation for UTIs. There are three acceptable methods of urine collection. The first is the midstream clean-catch method. After cleaning the urethral opening area in both men and women, 20 to 30 mL of urine is voided and discarded. The next part of the urine flow is collected and should be processed immediately (refrigerated as soon as possible). Specimens that are allowed to sit at room temperature for several hours may result in falsely elevated bacterial counts. The midstream clean catch is the preferred method for the routine collection of urine for culture. When a routine urine specimen cannot be collected or contamination occurs, alternative collection techniques must be used. 

Frequent evaluation of the need for routine laboratory measurements used for monitoring PN therapy. In... 

According to Geiss [4, p. 65], it is not a good principle to quote i st values as they are practically worthless and only give the appearance of certainty. In pharmacopoeias also, the still common linking of samples to standard substances with known values has been shown to be of doubtful value as routine laboratory practice. Therefore, only the hRf value is used to evaluate results in this book. 

The significant effect of traces of iron, nickel, copper and vanadium in petroleum feedstocks on processing economics has been responsible for the continuing attention focused on improvements in trace metal analytical procedures. This interest has intensified in our company because of the wide variety of crude oils now processed coupled with the need to meet more stringent contamination factors. These needs have increased demands on our laboratories for routine analyses at levels of less than 1 ppm. As a consequence our group was asked to evaluate requirements for trace metal analysis and to determine to what extent methods presently described in the literature could be adapted to our needs. 

---