Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

No-preference methods

No Preference Methods (e.g., global criterion and neutral compromise solution) These methods, as the name indicates, do not require any inputs from the decision maker either before, during or after solving the problem. Global criterion method can find a Pareto-optimal solution, close to the ideal objective vector. [Pg.11]

Fluidized bed dryer Minimization of product color deterioration and unit cost of final product. No-preference method Application is a dehydration plant for sliced potato. Pareto-optimal solutions were found from the single objective contours. Krokida and Kiranoudis (2000)... [Pg.31]

Several polymer types and classes are known to exhibit photoconductivity. Consequently no preferred method of synthesis exists. The known photoconductive polymers are prepared by almost all common methods like free-radical, cationic, anionic, coordination, and ring-opening polymerization, step-growth polymerization, and polymeranalo-gous reactions. The only common requirement for all photoconductive materials is that they have to be of extreme purity. It is well known [40-42] that even traces of impurities act as traps and have drastic influence on both quantum yield and carrier mobility. [Pg.791]

There is no one best method for describing solvent effects. The choice of method is dependent on the size of the molecule, type of solvent effects being examined, and required accuracy of results. Many of the continuum solvation methods predict solvation energy more accurately for neutral molecules than for ions. The following is a list of preferred methods, with those resulting in the highest accuracy and the least amount of computational effort appearing first ... [Pg.213]

Insufficient Reason.—When no preference can be assigned to the states, assume that they are equally likely, i.e., each occurs with probability 1 jn and proceed as in the risk method, choosing that act that gives... [Pg.316]

Since there are no comparable methods for determining the preferred conformation of 24 when it reacts with the enzyme, researchers in the field are... [Pg.397]

In summary, the procedure of the Nordic Committee describes a comprehensive validation protocol, but it is not specially designed for pesticide residue analysis and has no preferences with regard to single- or inter-laboratory validation. Therefore, if it is applied to pesticide residue methods, some specific validation requirements should be added. The procedure clearly lists all necessary steps of validation and adjusts its recommendations to the degree of previous external validation. [Pg.122]

Once values have been assigned for the costs and benefits of each proposed risk-reduction modification, a variety of economic evaluation techniques may be used to choose the most attractive option. These techniques include net present value, discounted cash flow rate of return and cost-benefit ratio analyses. Most companies have a preferred method for evaluating project economics, which can be used with little or no modification. Chapter 8 of... [Pg.117]

How well do these quantum-semiclassical methods work in describing the dynamics of non-adiabatic systems There are two sources of errors, one due to the approximations in the methods themselves, and the other due to errors in their application, for example, lack of convergence. For example, an obvious source of error in surface hopping and Ehrenfest dynamics is that coherence effects due to the phases of the nuclear wavepackets on the different surfaces are not included. This information is important for the description of short-time (few femtoseconds) quantum mechanical effects. For longer timescales, however, this loss of information should be less of a problem as dephasing washes out this information. Note that surface hopping should be run in an adiabatic representation, whereas the other methods show no preference for diabatic or adiabatic. [Pg.403]

Olfactory sensitivity for one individual varies about factor three due to climatological, physiological, environmental reaons etc. The sensory sensitivity also varies from odorant to odorant. So it is difficult to select a panel with a sensitivity distribution similar to that of the population. The preferred method in the United Kingdom for screening panelists uses the actual odor to be tested as a key component. In France selection is carried out on the basis of the threshold for five standard odorants. In Germany a normal sense of smell is requested of persons between the age of 18 and 50 years, in the Netherlands no exact specifications are given. Anyway, an extreme clustering around the mean or towards the extremes has to be avoided. [Pg.65]

Preferred method for noise reduction. The method of Gorry is recommended because no truncation of data occurs. [Pg.25]

Both the nicotinic and the muscarinic effects of the cholinesterase inhibitors can be life-threatening. Unfortunately, there is no effective method for directly blocking the nicotinic effects of cholinesterase inhibition, because nicotinic agonists and antagonists cause blockade of transmission (see Chapter 27). To reverse the muscarinic effects, a tertiary (not quaternary) amine drug must be used (preferably... [Pg.162]

The Z-substituted benzene (benzaldehyde, Figure 11.2) is not activated toward electrophilic attack since the HOMO of benzene is scarcely affected. No preferred site for attack of the electrophile can be deduced from inspection of the HOMOs. The interaction diagram for a Z-substituted pentadienyl cation, substituted in the 1-, 2-, and 3-positions, as models of the transition states for the ortho, meta, and para channels are too complex to draw simple conclusions. The HOMO and LUMO of the three pentadienyl cations with a formyl substituent are shown in Figure 11.4. The stabilities of the transition states should be in the order of the Hiickel n energies. These are 6a — 9.204 / , 6a — 9.2031/ , and 6a -9.1291/ , respectively. Thus, by SHMO, the ortho and meta channels are favored over the para channel, with no distinction between the ortho and meta pathways. Experimentally, meta substitution products are usually the major ones, contrary to the SHMO predictions. Either the SHMO method fails in this case or the predominance of meta products may be attributed to steric effects. [Pg.154]

Particle size is one of the principal determinants of powder behavior such as packing and consolidation, flow ability, compaction, etc., and it is therefore one of the most common and important areas of powder characterization. Typically, one refers to particle size or diameter as the largest dimension of its individual particles. Because a given powder consists of particles of many sizes, it is preferable to measure and describe the entire distribution. While many methods of size determination exist, no one method is perfect (5) two very common methods are sieve analysis and laser diffraction. Sieving is a very simple and inexpensive method, but it provides data at relatively few points within a distribution and is often very operator dependent. Laser diffraction is a very rapid technique and provides a detailed description of the distribution. However, its instrumentation is relatively expensive, the analytical results are subject to the unique and proprietary algorithms of the equipment manufacturer, and they often assume particle sphericity. The particle size distribution shown in Figure 1 was obtained by laser diffraction, where the curves represent frequency and cumulative distributions. [Pg.129]

Selected methods for the analysis of butadiene in various matrices are listed in Table 1. Methods of analysis of butadiene in air have recently been evaluated. There appears to be no single preferred method, but newer methods give higher performance. Thermal desorption methods provide high levels of accuracy and precision (Bianchi et al., 1997). [Pg.111]


See other pages where No-preference methods is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.2563]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.526]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.803]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.932]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.796]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.274]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 , Pg.154 ]




SEARCH



Preference methods

© 2024 chempedia.info