Human behavior experience

The vomeronasal organ (VNO), located in the nose, is a small chemical sensing stmcture associated with odors and behavioral effects. The vomeronasal system, which is made up of the VNO and a portion of the brain s limbic system, is stmcturaHy independent of the olfactory and nervous terminalis systems in the nose. It may, however, interact with these systems in a manner dependent on prior experience or learning, and therefore be direcdy related to the association of smells and experiences. This independent chemosensory system in the nose may prove to open doors to new learning associated with the sense of smell and human behavior. 

Animal models of fear and anxiety have primarily used the rat, the mouse and, to a lesser extent, nonhuman primates. It is not particularly difficult to evoke or measure anxiety in these species. However, difficulties arise when one attempts to define exactly how a stimulus and resultant behavioral response are related to human behavior, i.e. when a mouse exhibits freezing behavior to an unfamiliar and threatening cue, what is the human equivalent Or, similarly, what stimulus could one present to a rat to best model the anxiety-inducing-experience of... 

As described above, steroid hormones can affect many aspects of human behavior. However, correlations between specific steroid hormones and a given behavior often are weak. Many factors, including genetics, developmental experiences, cognitive states, and context variables determine human behavior, and may of course contribute to behavioral expression. 

Third, we rely too much on common-sense explanations of management. If this is true, it implies that, because we are human, each one of us is something of an expert in managing human behavior. We certainly know more about management from our everyday experiences than we do about physics, or astronomy, or archaeology. For this reason we usually have a starting point for our thinking what we think works, as opposed to what really works. We need an approach that is not blinded by these often erroneous assumptions and lets us get to the point - the real point. 

The nature-nurture problem revisited in most vertebrates, early experience of certain odors, interwoven with genetically anchored developmental processes, produces lasting, often irreversible odor recognition, preferences, or avoidance. Such behavioral development often occurs during more or less defined critical windows in time. The development of responses to odors often precedes that of odor production. Neonates already orient towards odors, while many pheromones are not produced until adulthood. Even before hatching or birth, the journey of chemical communication starts in the egg or the uterus. Knowing how chemical communication and chemosensoiy responses to food or danger develop is essential in areas such as animal husbandry or human behavior. 

Odors affect human behavior more than we realize. They are now appreciated as important in human health and disease. Above all, the powerful role of learning is impressive. Odors become associated with pleasant and unpleasant experiences and can retain their hedonic value lifelong. This applies to food, to social and sexual relationships, and to environments such as houses, workplaces, or landscapes. Writers rather than scientists have described such anecdotes. In Remembrances of Things Past, Marcel Proust evoked a flood of childhood memories by the taste of a madeleine dipped in lime-blossom tea. Jean-Paul Sartre tells in his autobiography Les Mots how the halitosis of his grade-school teacher became to him the odor of authority. 

The influence of odors such as perfumes and fragrances on human behavior is assumed to he acquired, and the responses elicited depend on the often complex previous social experiences. The response will be altered if a laboratory experiment eliminates contextual stimuli (Kirk-Smith and Booth, 1987). Social odors include those of the well-known security blankets in toddlers, familiarly scented bed sheets in new surroundings, and treating insomnia with mother s axillary odor on handkerchief. Removal of bad body odors (diet, metabolism defects) that disrupt interpersonal harmony appears to be universal. 

There are Limits to what animal studies can tell us about human behavior. There are also limits on what we can learn from laboratory experiments with human subjects. Because of financial constraints one may not be able to create high-stake situations in the laboratory/ unless one uses first-world research grants to study third-world subjects (Cameron 1995). Because of ethical constraints that were set up in the wake of Stanley Milgram s (1974) work, one cannot place subjects in situations that will induce strong negative emotions. Also, many of these studies rely on self-reports, which are a pretty fragile instrument. I believe, therefore, that to understand the subtler human emotions one has to turn to the last four sources, which is not to say that the first three have no value. 

It is not clear whether this deviation from optimality is found in human behavior. Controlled experiments with human subjects are difficult. Also, the human capacity for conscious choice and the complexity of human affairs tend to reduce the importance of purely mechanical reinforcement. Yet to the extent that human behavior is shaped by reinforcement, as suggested by some earlier examples, similar effects may be expected. 

Until 1995,1 shared the running of the inorganic chemistry department with Max Schmidt (in the scientific community well-known as Sulfur Max ) and, in retrospect, I know that this was a fortunate constellation for both of us (Fig. 2.23). When I became the Dean of the Faculty in 1987, he was usually the first to be contacted for advice since his experience and his understanding of human behavior was unique. Max was a wonderful and inspiring colleague and we remained in close contact until his untimely death in 2002. 

Unlike many other mammals, squirrels are active during the daytime. We can observe their choices directly, or simply by the results of their actions, here the food choices they made. In North America, the ubiquitous squirrels and chipmunks offer themselves for behavioral experiments in backyards, city parks, cemeteries. National and State parks, and on college campuses. There the animals are conditioned to humans so that experiments can be carried out without disturbing their behavior. 

Unfortunately, for the development of the human brain, this question can be addressed only indirectly—from animal experiments and by deduction. But even animal experiments are problematic because it s not always clear how measurements of animal behavior have any serious meaning for measurements of human behavior. An animal, even a chimpanzee, is not just a simplified human being exhibiting simplified human behavior. Deduction, on the other hand, gives us a clearer answer It stands to reason that clinical observations of the effects of brain-development aberrations are the proverbial tip of the iceberg—with an entire universe of subclinical differences, variations, and developmental aberrations that we have no means yet to measure. 

In addition to the above three kinds of classification methods, Rasmussen (1983) classified human behaviors into three types skilled behavior, rule behavior and knowledge behavior. Skilled behavior only requires the operator to response subconsciously to system information rule behavior is controlled by a set of rules or procedures, which needs the understanding on rules and procedures and the support of corresponding empirical knowledge behavior occurs in the situation who is not clear of the present symptoms, target state conflict or fresh scene environment completely not encountered, the operator must carry on analysis and decision relying on their own knowledge and experience. 

STOP can get personnel to learn that back of safe or unsafe situation substantively means human behavior. Safe behavior can bring up safety situation, in the converse, unsafe behavior can bring up unsafe situation. STOP can not only observe own unsafe behaviors but also observe others unsafe behavior. Safety knowledge and experience are shared each other. After STOP applied in safety management in coal mine, unsafe behavior clearly decrease. Safety consciousness of personnel evidently enhanced. 

The importance of subject experiments (or behavioral studies) is founded on the fact that for active safety, driver behavior is more important than the driving characteristics of the vehicle [17]. However, human behavior is subject to a large variability [43], which can be modeled, e.g., on the basis of experiments [87]. The findings from... 

---