Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Flame photometric

Other Detectors Two additional detectors are similar in design to a flame ionization detector. In the flame photometric detector optical emission from phosphorus and sulfur provides a detector selective for compounds containing these elements. The thermionic detector responds to compounds containing nitrogen or phosphorus. [Pg.570]

Potassium is analyzed in chemicals that are used in the fertilizer industry and in finished fertilizers by flame photometric methods (44) or volumetric sodium tertraphenylboron methods (45) as approved by the AO AC. Gravimetric deterrnination of potassium as K2PtClg, known as the Lindo-Gladding method (46), and the wet-digestion deterrnination of potassium (47) have been declared surplus methods by the AO AC. Other methods used for control purposes and special analyses include atomic absorption spectrophotometry, inductively coupled plasma (icp) emission spectrophotometry, and a radiometric method based on measuring the radioactivity of the minute amount of the isotope present in all potassium compounds (48). [Pg.536]

The flame-photometric detector (FPD) is selective for organic compounds containing phosphoms and sulfur, detecting chemiluminescent species formed ia a flame from these materials. The chemiluminescence is detected through a filter by a photomultipher. The photometric response is linear ia concentration for phosphoms, but it is second order ia concentration for sulfur. The minimum detectable level for phosphoms is about 10 g/s for sulfur it is about 5 x 10 g/s. [Pg.108]

The continuous methods combine sample collection and the measurement technique in one automated process. The measurement methods used for continuous analyzers include conductometric, colorimetric, coulometric, and amperometric techniques for the determination of SO2 collected in a liquid medium (7). Other continuous methods utilize physicochemical techniques for detection of SO2 in a gas stream. These include flame photometric detection (described earlier) and fluorescence spectroscopy (8). Instruments based on all of these principles are available which meet standard performance specifications. [Pg.201]

Application developed by using a Fisons GC 8000 chi omatogi aph where the two columns were installed and coupled via a moving capillary stream switching (MCSS) system. The chi omatogi aph was equiped with a flame-ionization detector on the MCSS system outlet and a Flame-photometric detector on the main column outlet, and a split/splitless injector. [Pg.221]

M. De Paoli, M. Barbina Taccheo, R. Mondini, A. Pezzoni and A. Valentino, Determination of organophosphoms pesticides in fruits by on-line size-exclusion chi O-matography-flame photometric detection , 7. Chromatogr. 626 145-151 (1992). [Pg.248]

The flame photometric analysis of this solution established that 70% of 6 is dissociated as the Na" salt. [Pg.344]

The purpose of the nebuliser-burner system is to convert the test solution to gaseous atoms as indicated in Fig. 21.2, and the success of flame photometric methods is dependent upon the correct functioning of the nebuliser-burner system. It should, however, be noted that some flame photometers have a very simple burner system (see Section 21.13). [Pg.785]

Separation techniques may have to be applied if the given sample contains substances which act as interferences (Section 21.10), or, as explained above, if the concentration of the element to be determined in the test solution is too low to give satisfactory absorbance readings. As already indicated (Section 21.10), the separation methods most commonly used in conjunction with flame spectrophotometric methods are solvent extraction (see Chapter 6) and ion exchange (Chapter 7). When a solvent extraction method is used, it may happen that the element to be determined is extracted into an organic solvent, and as discussed above it may be possible to use this solution directly for the flame photometric measurement. [Pg.802]

Flame Photometric Detector3 With the flame photometric detector (FPD), as with the FID, the sample effluent is burned in a hydrogen/air flame. By using optical filters to select wavelengths specific to sulfur and phosphorus and a photomultiplier tube, sulfur or phosphorus compounds can be selectively detected. [Pg.11]

One great advantage of GC is the variety of detectors that are available. These include universal detectors, such as flame ionization detectors and selective detectors, such as flame photometric and thermionic detectors. The most generally useful detectors, excluding the mass spectrometer are described in the following sections. [Pg.201]

As the DI plant becomes exhausted, silica leakage occurs in the treated MU water and the pH falls abruptly. Furthermore, where sodium ion leakage occurs from the cation bed, it produces a regenerative effect on the anion bed, which may also lead to silica leakage. To differentiate between the two phenomena, sodium ion leakage from the cation bed should be assessed directly using selective sodium-ion electrodes, flame photometric analysis, or other appropriate test methods. [Pg.199]

Boraiko C, Yoder R, Cooper J, Lieckfield R Jr, Remski M (2004) Sampling and analysis of butyltin compounds in air using gas chromatography and flame photometric detection. Journai of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1 (1 ) 50-56. [Pg.44]

Jiang GB, Xu FZ, Zhang FJ (1999) Dioctyltin and tributyltin detection at trace levels in water and beverages by capillary gas chromatography with flame photometric detection. Fresenius Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 363(3) 256-260. [Pg.47]

The primary method for detecting methyl parathion and metabolites in biological tissues is gas chromatography (GC) coupled with electron capture (BCD), flame photometric (FPD), or flame ionization detection (FID). Sample preparation for methyl parathion analysis routinely involves extraction with an organic solvent (e g., acetone or benzene), centrifugation, concentration, and re suspension in a suitable solvent prior to GC analysis. For low concentrations of methyl parathion, further cleanup procedures, such as column chromatography on silica gel or Florisil are required. [Pg.175]

EC = electrical conductivity detector ECD = electron capture detector FPD = flame photometric detector GC = gas chromatography HPLC = high performance liquid chromatography NPD = nitrogen phosphorus detector TID = thermionic detector UV = ultraviolet spectroscopy... [Pg.180]

Amirav A, Jing H. 1998. Simultaneous pulsed flame photometric and mass spectrometric detection for enhanced pesticide analysis capabilities. J Chromatogr 814 133-150. [Pg.192]

Baynes RE, Bowen JM. 1995. Rapid determination of methyl parathion and methyl paraoxon in milk by gas chromatography with solid-phase extraction and flame photometric detection. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 78 812-815. [Pg.194]

Gabica JJ, Wyllie J, Watson M, et al. 1971. Example of flame photometric analysis for methyl parathion in rat whole blood and brain tissue. Anal Chem 43 1102-1105. [Pg.208]

Prinsloo SM, De Beer P143R. 1985. Gas chromatographic relative retention data for pesticides on nine packed columns I. Organophosphorus pesticides, using flame photometric detection. J Assoc Off Anal Chem 68 1100-1108. [Pg.227]

Stan H-J, Mrowetz D. 1983. Residue analysis of organophosphorus pesticides in food with 2-dimensional gas chromatography using capillary columns and flame photometric detection. J High Resol Chromatog Chromatog Comm 6 255-263. [Pg.232]

Kumata H, H Takada, N Ogura (1996) Determination of 2-4-morpholinyl benzothiazole in environmental samples by a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame photometric detector. Anal Chem 68 1976-1981. [Pg.670]

GC nitrogen-phosphorus detector (NPD), flame photometric detector (FPD), electron capture detector (BCD), flame ionization detector (FID), mass-spectrometric detector (MS)... [Pg.27]

The presence of heteroatoms usually provides a convenient feature for improving selectivity by employing selective detection mechanisms. GC may then use flame photometric detection (FPD) for S and P atoms and to a certain extent for N, Se, Si etc. thermoselective detection (TSD) and nitrogen-phosphorus detection (NPD) for N and P atoms electron capture detection (ECD) for halogen atoms (E, Cl, Br, and 1) and for systems with conjugated double bonds and electron-drawing groups or atomic emission detection (AED) for many heteroatoms. [Pg.53]

On the other hand, if only specific GC detectors, e.g. the electron capture, nitrogen-phosphorus or flame photometric detectors, are tested, the argument of lack of GC method sensitivity is not acceptable. In most cases mass spectrometric detectors provide the sensitivity and selectivity needed. Unfortunately, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) or MS" detectors for GC are still not widely used in official laboratories, and therefore these techniques are not always accepted for enforcement methods. [Pg.108]

For multi-analyte and/or multi-matrix methods, it is not possible to validate a method for all combinations of analyte, concentration and type of sample matrix that may be encountered in subsequent use of the method. On the other hand, the standards EN1528 andEN 12393 consist of a range of old multi-residue methods. The working principles of these methods are accepted not only in Europe, but all over the world. Most often these methods are based on extractions with acetone, acetonitrile, ethyl acetate or n-hexane. Subsequent cleanup steps are based on solvent partition steps and size exclusion or adsorption chromatography on Florisil, silica gel or alumina. Each solvent and each cleanup step has been successfully applied to hundreds of pesticides and tested in countless method validation studies. The selectivity and sensitivity of GC combined with electron capture, nitrogen-phosphorus, flame photometric or mass spectrometric detectors for a large number of pesticides are acceptable. [Pg.113]


See other pages where Flame photometric is mentioned: [Pg.612]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.699]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.439]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.593 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.266 ]




SEARCH



Analytical flame photometric detector

Calcium flame photometric determination

Capillary electrophoresis with flame photometric

Capillary electrophoresis with flame photometric detection

Columns flame photometric

Flame photometric detection

Flame photometric detection chromatograms

Flame photometric detection method

Flame photometric detector

Flame photometric detector , selective

Flame photometric detector comparison

Flame photometric detector design

Flame photometric detector for

Flame photometric detector hydrocarbon

Flame photometric detector operation

Flame photometric detector performance

Flame photometric detector phosphorus-selective

Flame photometric detector response characteristics

Flame photometric detector sulfur

Flame photometric detector sulfur dioxide

Flame photometric detector, volatile

Flame photometric detector, volatile compounds

Flame-photometric detector (FPD)

GC-flame photometric detector

GC-flame photometric detector FPD) analysis of runoff water

GC-flame photometric detector extracts

Gas chromatography-flame photometric

Gas chromatography-flame photometric detection

Identification flame photometric detector

Magnesium, flame photometric determination

Photometric

Potassium, flame photometric determination

Pulsed flame photometric detection

Pulsed flame photometric detector

Pulsed-flame photometric detector PFPD)

Sodium, flame photometric determination

Sulfur aerosol, flame photometric detector

Sulfur-phosphorus flame photometric detectors

The Flame Photometric Detector

The Sulfur-Phosphorous Flame Photometric Detector (SP-FPD)

© 2024 chempedia.info