Elemental analytical procedure

Although isotope-dilution analysis can be very accurate, a number of precautions need to be taken. Some of these are obvious ones that any analytical procedure demands. For example, analyte preparation for both spiked and unspiked sample must be as nearly identical as possible the spike also must be intimately mixed with the sample before analysis so there is no differential effect on the subsequent isotope ration measurements. The last requirement sometimes requires special chemical treatment to ensure that the spike element and the sample element are in the same chemical state before analysis. However, once procedures have been set in place, the highly sensitive isotope-dilution analysis gives excellent precision and accuracy for the estimation of several elements at the same time or just one element. 

The function of the analyst is to obtain a result as near to the true value as possible by the correct application of the analytical procedure employed. The level of confidence that the analyst may enjoy in his results will be very small unless he has knowledge of the accuracy and precision of the method used as well as being aware of the sources of error which may be introduced. Quantitative analysis is not simply a case of taking a sample, carrying out a single determination and then claiming that the value obtained is irrefutable. It also requires a sound knowledge of the chemistry involved, of the possibilities of interferences from other ions, elements and compounds as well as of the statistical distribution of values. The purpose of this chapter is to explain some of the terms employed and to outline the statistical procedures which may be applied to the analytical results. 

Since the sulphone group contains sulphur in its highest oxidation state, specific analytical procedures based on controlled oxidation are not possible. The complete molecule can be submitted to oxidative degradation, e.g. in the elemental sulphur determination, methods for which, as stated above, will not be included here. 

Today it has become clear that the effect of trace elements in living systems, in food, and in the environment depends on the chemical form in which the element enters the system and the final form in which it is present. The form, or species, clearly governs its biochemical and geochemical behaviour. lUPAC (the International Union for Pure and Applied Chemistry) has recently set guidelines for terms related to chemical speciation of trace elements (Templeton et al. 2000). Speciation, or the analytical activity of measuring the chemical species, is a relatively new scientific field. The procedures usually consist of two consecutive steps (i) the separation of the species, and (2) their measurement An evident handicap in speciation analysis is that the concentration of the individual species is far lower than the total elemental concentration so that an enrichment step is indispensable in many cases. Such a proliferation of steps in analytical procedure not only increases the danger of losses due to incomplete recovery, chemical instability of the species and adsorption to laboratory ware, but may also enhance the risk of contamination from reagents and equipment. 

Particularly for direct microanalytical techniques using <10 mg of sample for analysis, it is highly desirable to obtain quantitative information on element- and compound-specific homogeneity in the certificates for validation and quality control of measurements. As the mean concentration in a CRM is clearly material-related, the standard deviation of this mean value should represent the element s distribution in this matrix rather than differences in the analytical procedures used. 

INAA is well suited to study homogeneity of small samples because of its dynamic range of elemental sensitivity. The technique allows for the use of small solid samples, with the smallest usable sample size in the range of 0.5 mg to i mg as determined by handling and blank considerations. The INAA analytical procedure is well understood and characterized with mathematical relationships. Its analytical uncertainties can be sufficiently controlled and can be well determined for a particular procedure. This allows the calculation of the contribution of material heterogeneity to the uncertainty budget based on experimental data. 

Chase and Long (1997) propose that this conundrum can be eliminated by the use of Zero Reference Materials (ZRMs) in analytical methods development to fully evaluate the method. A ZRM is a product matrix that lacks those nutrient components that are to be assayed, i.e. a blank matrix. The use of a ZRM in method development can and will give a true indication as to how the method will perform as the spiked nutrient levels approach zero. For example, two products. Corn Starch (NIST RM 8432) and Microcrystalline Cellulose (NIST RM 8416), contain very low elemental concentrations and could conceivably serve as real sample blanks or ZRMs in some analytical procedures. 

The nature and the relative amounts in which the components of materials have to be detected in different analytical studies varies greatly from the identification and determination of the few major elements that make up a material, to the wide range, often in almost vanishing concentrations, of impurities. From a practical point of view and regardless of the objective of, or the type of information required from an analysis, most analytical procedures entail a sequence of three main operations ... 

In the ideal case only the diagonal elements of the sensitivity matrix are different from zero. Then no component disturbs any other and the analytical procedure works selectively (see Sect. 7.3). The K-malrix is defined analogously except that the elements are called kij, their definition is the same as the Sij according to Eq. (7.16). 

Certain volatile elements must be analyzed by special analytical procedures as irreproducible losses may occur during sample preparation and atomization. Arsenic, antimony, selenium, and tellurium are determined via the generation of their covalent hydrides by reaction with sodium borohydride. The resulting volatile hydrides are trapped in a liquid nitrogen trap and then passed into an electrically heated silica tube. This tube thermally decomposes these compounds into atoms that can be quantified by AAS. Mercury is determined via the cold-vapor... 

On the basis of the preceding discussion, it should be obvious that ultratrace elemental analysis can be performed without any major problems by atomic spectroscopy. A major disadvantage with elemental analysis is that it does not provide information on element speciation. Speciation has major significance since it can define whether the element can become bioavailable. For example, complexed iron will be metabolized more readily than unbound iron and the measure of total iron in the sample will not discriminate between the available and nonavailable forms. There are many other similar examples and analytical procedures that must be developed which will enable elemental speciation to be performed. Liquid chromatographic procedures (either ion-exchange, ion-pair, liquid-solid, or liquid-liquid chromatography) are the best methods to speciate samples since they can separate solutes on the basis of a number of parameters. Chromatographic separation can be used as part of the sample preparation step and the column effluent can be monitored with atomic spectroscopy. This mode of operation combines the excellent separation characteristics with the element selectivity of atomic spectroscopy. AAS with a flame as the atom reservoir or AES with an inductively coupled plasma have been used successfully to speciate various ultratrace elements. 

Carbon and hydrogen in coke can be determined by the standard analytical procedures for coal and coke (ASTM D3178, D3179). However, in addition to carbon, hydrogen, and metallic constituents, coke contains considerable amounts of nitrogen and sulfur that must be determined prior to sale or use. These elements will appear as their oxides (NO, SO ), respectively, when the coke is combusted, thereby causing serious environmental issues. 

Several thousand articles have been published on analytical procedures for chemical elements in which solvent extraction is involved. The scope of this chapter limits us to only one example for each element (Table 13.1). 

The mineral petalite was mined as an ore in Sweden. In 1817 Johan August Arfwedson (1792—1841) analyTed this new mineral. After identifying several compounds in the ore, he realized there was a small percentage of the ore that could not be identified. After applying more analytical procedures, he determined it was a new alkali. It turned out that petalite contains hthium aluminum silicate, LiAllSi O lj. In 1818 the first lithium metal was prepared independently by two scientists, Sir Humphry Davy (1778—1892) and W.T. Brande (1788—1866). Lithium was discovered at a time in the early nineteenth century when numerous new elements were discovered and identified by other scientists. Many of these newly named elements were predicted by the use of the periodic table of the chemical elements. 

Whereas the microprocessor controls an individual basic operation, the central computer, which has all the analytical procedures held in its memory, controls the particular analytical procedure required. At the appropriate time, the central computer transmits the relevant set of parameters to the corresponding units and provides the schedule for the sample-transport operation. All units are monitored to ensure proper functioning. If one of the units signals an error, a predetermined action, such as disposing of the sample, is taken. The basic results from the units are transferred to the central computer, the final results are calculated, and the report is passed to the output terminal. These results can also be transmitted to other data processing equipment for administrative or management purposes. The central control is, therefore, the leading element in a hierarchy of... 

These rules may appear very daunting but there are a number of tools commercially available for trace analysis. Before defining the best analytical procedure, it is important to define clearly the objectives of the analytical procedure. The analytical procedure and the instrumental requirements must be considered how many elements need to be determined, what level of precision is required and in what form are the samples submitted for analysis Another important parameter is the time available to obtain the result. 

Because we are generally able to define the chemistry of an aqueous solution containing n chemical elements by analytical procedures, n equations such as 8.48 and 8.49 exist, relating the bulk concentration of a given element mj to all species actually present in solution. Associated with mass balance equations of this type may be a charge balance equation expressing the overall neutrality of the solution ... 

---