Chernobyl

The partial meltdown of the 1000 MW reactor at Chernobyl, Ukraine, on April 26, 1986 released large amounts of radiocesium and other radionuclides into the environment (Table 27.3), causing widespread radioactive contamination of Europe and the former Soviet Union. Among the reactors operating in the former Soviet Union are 13 identical to the one in Chernobyl, Ukraine, including units in Chernobyl, Leningrad, Kursk, and Smolensk. 

Effective dose equivalents from the Chernobyl accident in various regions of the world were highest in southeastern Europe (1.2 mSv), Northern Europe (0.97 mSv), and Central Europe (0.93 mSv). (Note 1 mSv = 0.1 rem.) In the first year after the accident, whole body effective dose equivalents were highest in Bulgaria, Austria, Greece, and Romania (0.5-0.8 mSv) Einland, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Italy (0.3-0.5 mSv) Switzerland, Poland, U.S.S.R, 

Hungary, Norway, Germany, and Turkey (0.2-0.3 mSv) and elsewhere ( 0.2 mSv). This value was 0.81 mSv in the former Soviet Union, 0.2 mSv in southwest Asia and Western Europe, and 0.1 mSv elsewhere. By comparison, the recommended whole-body annual effective dose equivalent for the general public is 5 mSv. Thyroid dose equivalents were significantly hi er than whole-body effective dose equivalents because of significant amounts of iodine-131 in the released materials. 

Thyroid dose equivalents were as high as 25 mSv to infants in Bulgaria, 20 mSv in Greece, and 20 mSv in Romania the adult 

Chernobyl air plume behavior and reported initial arrival times of detectable radioactivity. Plume A originated from Chernobyl on April 26,1986, Plume B on April 27-28, and Plume C on April 29-30. The numbers indicate initial arrival times April 1, 26 April 2, 27 April 3, 28 April 4, 29 April 5, 30 May 6,1 May 7, 2 and May 8, 3. 

SCRAM stands for safety critical reactor ax man. It is a term from the early days of nuclear power development, when control rods were raised and lowered into the reactor core with a rope on a pulley. The ax man stood ready to cut the rope in an emergency, dropping all control rods all way down, shutting down the reactor. 

At 2 00 PM, in violation of safety regulations, the operators switched off the emergency cooling system. Just after midnight on April 26th, they violated another rule by switching off the reactor s power-density controls. 

Under manual operation, the reactor became unstable. At 1 07 AM, the power output suddenly dropped to 0.03 gigawatts (GW), far less than the specified minimum of 0.70 GW. To generate more power, the operators raised the control rods to the maximum height allowed by regulations. Diatlov ordered them to raise the rods further. When the operators balked, Diatlov insisted, and the operators eomplied. 

At 1 23 AM, the power output seemed to be stable at 0.2 GW. The operators violated yet another regulation by disabling the emergency SCRAM, an automatic interlock designed to stop the reactor whenever the neutron flux exceeds a safe limit. (In modem nuclear power plants, it is physically impossible to disable this control.) 

Now the experiment could begin. To see how long the turbine would spin without a supply of steam, they closed the valve that chaimelled steam from 

---

Ten years passed since the biggest radioactive catastrophe in the history of humanity happened at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The Russian State medical dosimetric Register was founded after this catastrophe At present in the Register they keep a medical and radiation-dosimetric information about 435.276 persons. 

Ukraine has five nuclear power stations with fifteen reactors with a total power output of 13.6 thousand MW (13 reactors of WWR type and 2 reactors of RBMK type in the Chernobyl NFS). In addition there are 47 thermal power stations with a total power output of 32.4 thousand MW, 6 large hydraulic power stations on the Dnieper and 55 small stations on other rivers. 

Nuclear power has achieved an excellent safety record. Exceptions are the accidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and at Chernobyl in 1986. In the United States, safety can be attributed in part to the strict regulation provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which reviews proposed reactor designs, processes appHcations forUcenses to constmct and operate plants, and provides surveillance of all safety-related activities of a utiUty. The utiUties seek continued improvement in capabiUty, use procedures extensively, and analy2e any plant incidents for their root causes. Similar programs intended to ensure reactor safety are in place in other countries. 

Optimism about economic growth in the period 1960—1975 led to a large number of reactor orders. Many of these were canceled even after partial completion in the period after the 1974 oil crisis, as the result of a reduction in energy demand. Inflation, high interest rates, long constmction periods, and regulatory delays resulted in severe cost overmns. Moreover, the reactor accidents of TMI and, later, Chernobyl produced an atmosphere of pubHc concern. 

Chernobyl. The most weU-known graphite-moderated reactor is the infamous Chemobyl-4, in Ukraine. It suffered a devastating accident in 1986 that spread radioactivity over a wide area of Europe. 

D. R. Marples, Chernobyl andNuclear Power in the ULLR, St. Martin s Press, New York, 1986. 

The accident at the Three Mile Island (TMI) plant in Pennsylvania in 1979 led to many safety and environmental improvements (4—6). No harm from radiation resulted to TMI workers, to the pubHc, or to the environment (7,8), although the accident caused the loss of a 2 x 10 investment. The accident at the Chernobyl plant in the Ukraine in 1986, on the other hand, caused the deaths of 31 workers from high doses of radiation, increased the chance of cancer later in life for thousands of people, and led to radioactive contamination of large areas. This latter accident was unique to Soviet-sponsored nuclear power. The Soviet-designed Chemobyl-type reactors did not have the intrinsic protection against a mnaway power excursion that is requited in the test of the world, not was there a containment building (9—11). 

X Bq of Pu has been released, mostiy from bum-up of the nuclear powered sateUite SNAP-9a and that 3.7 X 10 Bqof + ° Pu was released by the Chernobyl accident (167,168). Many studies have been done to determine the cumulative fallout on sods, plants, bodies of water, animals, and humans. For example, the cumulative Pu fallout ia forest and grasslands and ia the Hver of elderly humans ia Bavaria, Germany are approximately... 

It has been suggested that cesium may be useflil in the fixation of radioactive waste in a cesium-based glass and in detoxification procedures for fugitive Cs emissions, such as at Chernobyl, Ukraine. 

Institute for Safety Problems ofNPP NASU, Chernobyl ... 

This proeedure has been applied to thousands soil and sediment samples and hundreds biologieal and water samples taken in the exelusive zone of Chernobyl NPP and different regions of Ukraine. The methods developments ai e deseribed. 

ESTIMATION OF SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CHERNOBYL S INCIDENT ON ELEMENT DISTRIBUTIONS IN SAMPLES TAKEN FROM REACTOR CONCRETE CASING... 

Since the disaster with the reactor at Chernobyl in May 1986, the contamination of drugs with radioactive substances has regularly been the subject of research reports. In the meantime, in the Huropean Community, the maximum value has been fixed at 600 Bq/kg, a figure which also guides the drug... 

The release of radioactivity from the accident at Chernobyl would be considered primarily a regional or continental problem. However, higher than usual levels of radioactivity were detected in the Pacific Northwest part of the United States soon after the accident. This indicates the long-range transport that occurred following this accident. 

ApSimon, H. M., and WUson, J. J, N., Modeling atmospheric dispersal of the Chernobyl release across Europe. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 41, 123-133 (1987). 

Below the Chernobyl reactor were water pools meant to capture and condense any steam released from a pipe break or any other failure in the containment rooms. A system of relief valves and ducts led from the containment rooms to these suppression pools. RBMK s were built in pairs ... 

Chernobyl may represent the upper limit that is possible in a nuclear power plant accident. 

It may be noted that in the case of TMI-2, the core partially melted but did not get out of the pressure vessel. In the case of Chernobyl, there was no containment in the U.S. sense and what confinement there was, was disrupted by the nuclear excursion (like an explosion). 

---