Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nuclear power generation Chernobyl

This is not intended to sound callous any death is a tragedy to the people concerned but it is intended to put the problem in perspective. W.K.Sinclair has given statistics of deaths per year in the USA from avoidable accidental causes. Nuclear power generation, including the very occasional release, is said to cause typically 100 deaths per year. Smoking causes 150000, alcohol 100000, road accidents 50000 and accidents with guns 17500. Chernobyl almost fades into insignificance by comparison. [Pg.32]

The history of the first serious attention paid to safety culture may be traced back to a report prepared by the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group in 1988, on the Chernobyl nuclear power station disaster in Ukraine [10]. The concept has gained worldwide recognition in several industrial sectors, particularly in nuclear power generation and aviation. Probably the most important feature of the safety culture is shared perceptions among staff members and management concerning the importance of safety [11]. [Pg.74]

Nuclear power generation, however, is not without problems. Foremost among them is the danger of nuclear accidents. In spite of safety precautions, the fission reaction occurring in a nuclear power plant can overheat. The most famous examples of this occurred in Chernobyl, in the former Soviet Union, on April 26, 1986, and at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan in March of 2011. [Pg.931]

Makeyeva, A.P., N.G. Yemel yanova, N.V. Belova, and I.N. Ryabov. 1995. Radiobiological analysis of silver carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, from the cooling pond of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant since the time of the accident. 2. Development of the reproductive system in the first generation of offspring. Jour. Ichthyol. 35 40-64. [Pg.1745]

There have been two major accidents (Three Mile Island in the United States and Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union) in which control was lost in nuclear power plants, with subsequent rapid increases in fission rates that resulted in steam explosions and releases of radioactivity. The protective shield of reinforced concrete, which surrounded the Three Mile Island Reactor, prevented release of any radioactivity into the environment. In the Russian accident there had been no containment shield, and, when the steam explosion occurred, fission products plus uranium were released to the environment—in the immediate vicinity and then carried over the Northern Hemisphere, in particular over large areas of Eastern Europe. Much was learned from these accidents and the new generations of reactors are being built to be passive safe. In such passive reactors, when the power level increases toward an unsafe level, the reactor turns off automatically to prevent the high-energy release that would cause the explosive release of radioactivity. Such a design is assumed to remove a major factor of safety concern in reactor operation, see also Bohr, Niels Fermi, Enrico AIan-HATTAN Project Plutonium Radioactivity Uranium. [Pg.871]

Nuclear fission provides about 20% of the electricity generated within the UK. Economic womies about the decommissioning of old nuclear stations, and major accidents in Windscale UK (1957), Three Mile Island USA (1979) and Chernobyl Ukraine (1986) have caused many people to question whether or not more nuclear plants should be built. This is a photograph of the fourth reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant where an explosion resulted in the world s worst nuclear accident. [Pg.405]

At the time of the accident, the nuclear power station at Chernobyl comprised four operating units and two under construction. Each unit is made up of one reactor of the RBMK-1000 type and two turbine-generators. The two units 3 and 4 are accommodated in one block as shown in Fig. 2.1. The two reactors are separated by a compartment housing common services. Alongside is the turbine hall with the four turbines in line. The blocks accommodating units 1, 2, 3 and 4 are adjacent (so that all eight turbines are in line). The block for units 5 and 6, not now to be completed, is sited 1.5 km to the south-east. [Pg.9]

The third phase of the studies on severe accidents started after Chernobyl. This terrible accident taught the industry that even a small contamination risk, like the one which affected Western Europe as a consequence of the accident, may generate panic in the population and turn public opinion against nuclear energy power generation. [Pg.54]

In 1986, an accident occurred at the Chernobyl Unit 4 reactor near Kiev in Ukraine. The Chernobyl reactor was a light water-cooled graphite-moderated (LWG) reactor. This accident led to the release of a large amoimt of airborne radioactivity and the death of many of the responders. As a result of this accident, several countries with smaller nuclear power programs ceased the pursuit of nuclear power electricity generation. [Pg.6]


See other pages where Nuclear power generation Chernobyl is mentioned: [Pg.264]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.940]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.665]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.2639]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.865]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.931]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.1229]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1496 ]




SEARCH



Chernobyl

Chernobyl nuclear

Nuclear power

Power generating

Power generation nuclear powered

© 2024 chempedia.info