Chernobyl Unit 4 reactor accident

Nuclear weapons production and testing facilities (Hanford, WA, Savannah River, GA, Rocky Flats, CO, and The Nevada Test Site, in the United States, and Mayak in the former Soviet Union), also released small amounts. The releases occurred in accidents with nuclear weapons, the reentry of satellites that used Pu-238, and by the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. 

While we recognize the major concern attendant on widespread use of nuclear power in particular reactor malfunction, we note that no reactor accident that harmed any member of the public has occurred in any facility meeting international safety standards (Chernobyl did not meet the standards). Eossilfuel pollution from power plants is estimated to cause 40,000 to 70,000 deaths per year in the United States alone. 

Only two earlier reactor accidents caused significant releases or radionuclides the one at Windscale (United Kingdom) in October 1957 and the other at Three Mile Island (United States) in March 1979 (UNSCEAR-1982). While it is very difficult to estimate the fraction of the Windscale radionuclide core inventory that was released to the atmosphere, it has been estimated that the accident released twice the amount of noble gases that was released at Chernobyl, but 2,000 times less and Cs (DOE-1987). The Three Mile Island accident released approximately 2% as much noble gases and 0.00002% as much l as the Chernobyl accident. 

Certainly the most catastrophic nuclear accident occurred on April 26, 1986, at the Chernobyl unit 4 reactor near Kiev, Ukraine. The accident resulted in a core meltdown, explosion, and fire. 

In 1986, an accident occurred at the Chernobyl Unit 4 reactor near Kiev in Ukraine. The Chernobyl reactor was a light water-cooled graphite-moderated (LWG) reactor. This accident led to the release of a large amoimt of airborne radioactivity and the death of many of the responders. As a result of this accident, several countries with smaller nuclear power programs ceased the pursuit of nuclear power electricity generation. 

Many see the commercial nuclear power station as a hazard to human life and the environment. Part of this is related to the atomic-weapon heritage of the nuclear reactor, and part is related to the reactor accidents that occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear power station near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in 1979, and Chernobyl nuclear power station near Kiev in the Ukraine in 1986. The accident at Chernobyl involved Unit-4, a reactor that was a light water cooled, graphite moderated reactor built without a containment vessel. The accident resulted in 56 deaths that have been directly attributed to it, and the potential for increased cancer deaths from those exposed to the radioactive plume that emanated from the reactor site at the time of the accident. Since the accident, the remaining three reactors at the station have been shut down, the last one in 2000. The accident at Three Mile Island... 

Nuclear power has achieved an excellent safety record. Exceptions are the accidents at Three Mile Island in 1979 and at Chernobyl in 1986. In the United States, safety can be attributed in part to the strict regulation provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which reviews proposed reactor designs, processes appHcations forUcenses to constmct and operate plants, and provides surveillance of all safety-related activities of a utiUty. The utiUties seek continued improvement in capabiUty, use procedures extensively, and analy2e any plant incidents for their root causes. Similar programs intended to ensure reactor safety are in place in other countries. 

The fear of accidents like Chernobyl, and the high cost of nuclear waste disposal, halted nuclear power plant construction in the United States m the 1980s, and in most ol the rest ol the world by the 1990s. Because nuclear fusion does not present the waste disposal problem of fission reactors, there is hope that fusion will be the primary energy source late in the twenty-first centuiy as the supplies of natural gas and petroleum dwindle. 

The past safety record of nuclear reactors, other than the Soviet Chernobyl-type RBMK reactors, is excellent Excluding RBMK reactors, there had been about 9000 reactor-years of operation in the world by the end of 1999, including about 2450 in the United States.1 In this time there was only one accident involving damage to the reactor core, the 1979 Three Mile Island accident, and even at TMI there was very little release of radionuclides to the outside environment. 

Everyone s worst fears about nuclear power became a reality in tlie later part of April 1986. A large Soviet reactor - unit number 4 at Chernobyl, 80 utiles nortli of Kiev, and only 3 years old blew out and burned, spewing radioactive debris over much of Europe. Radiation levels increased from Sweden to Britain, tlirough Poland, and as far soutli as Italy. The damage caused to tlie environment far surpassed tlial due to tlie accident at Tliree Mile Island. 

On 26 April 1986 at 0123 hours local time an accident occurred at the fourth unit of the Chernobyl nuclear power station. The accident destroyed the reactor core and part of the building in which the core was housed. The radioactive materials released were carried away in the form of gases and dust particles by air currents. In this manner, they were widely dispersed over the territory of the Soviet Union, over many other (mostly European) countries and, in trace amounts, throughout the northern hemisphere. 

United States in 1979 and the Chernobyl nuclear accident in Ukraine in 1986, shown in Figure 25-20, provide powerful examples of why controlling the reactor is critical. 

The explosion of the nuclear reactor at Chernobyl (spelling changed recently to Chornobyl) in the Ukraine on April 26, 1986 sent radioactive material as far away as Sweden.90 The current death toll is 45. There has been a huge increase in childhood thyroid cancer, with cases as far as 500 km away 91 (U. S. bomb tests have also increased the incidence of thyroid cancers in the western United States.92) There is a 30-km exclusion zone around the plant where no one is allowed to live. This was created by the evacuation of 135,000 people 93 The accident is said to have happened because of combination of the physical characteristics of the reactor, the design of the control rods, human error and management shortcomings in the design, and implementation of the safety experiment. ... 

There have been two major accidents (Three Mile Island in the United States and Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union) in which control was lost in nuclear power plants, with subsequent rapid increases in fission rates that resulted in steam explosions and releases of radioactivity. The protective shield of reinforced concrete, which surrounded the Three Mile Island Reactor, prevented release of any radioactivity into the environment. In the Russian accident there had been no containment shield, and, when the steam explosion occurred, fission products plus uranium were released to the environment—in the immediate vicinity and then carried over the Northern Hemisphere, in particular over large areas of Eastern Europe. Much was learned from these accidents and the new generations of reactors are being built to be passive safe. In such passive reactors, when the power level increases toward an unsafe level, the reactor turns off automatically to prevent the high-energy release that would cause the explosive release of radioactivity. Such a design is assumed to remove a major factor of safety concern in reactor operation, see also Bohr, Niels Fermi, Enrico AIan-HATTAN Project Plutonium Radioactivity Uranium. 

The papers in this Watt Committee report describe the Chernobyl Number 4 Reactor, detail the main components of the accident and its consequences, and then explore what there is of relevance to the United Kingdom at a time when the future of nuclear power here is a major issue between the political parties. 

At the time of the accident, the nuclear power station at Chernobyl comprised four operating units and two under construction. Each unit is made up of one reactor of the RBMK-1000 type and two turbine-generators. The two units 3 and 4 are accommodated in one block as shown in Fig. 2.1. The two reactors are separated by a compartment housing common services. Alongside is the turbine hall with the four turbines in line. The blocks accommodating units 1, 2, 3 and 4 are adjacent (so that all eight turbines are in line). The block for units 5 and 6, not now to be completed, is sited 1.5 km to the south-east. 

At 01.23 hours on 26 April 1986, Unit No. 4 of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Station was operating at low power prior to a scheduled shutdown when a sudden, very rapid and uncontrolled power increase occurred. This resulted in the destruction of the reactor core and severe damage to the reactor building. There was a release of radioactive material from the core over the subsequent 9 days. The accident is now known to have occurred as a result of a test which was being carried out by the operators. The manner in which the test was conducted, including the disabling of all the safety systems provided to protect the plant, was the immediate cause of the accident. However, aspects of the reactor design resulted in the adverse response of the reactor which caused its destruction. 

The RBMK reactor has been developed in the former Soviet Union, and has become known in the West mostly because of the Chernobyl accident (GRS 1996). Quite a number of reactors of this type, slightly modified, are still operating in the area of the former Soviet Union. The reactor uses the principle of the BWR It has, however, neither reactor vessel nor containment. The reactor vessel is replaced by 1,661 pressure tubes. As shown in Fig. 57.12 each pressure tube houses two fuel elements in series. Each fuel element consists of an array of 18 fuel rods. The cooling water enters the pressure tubes from below and exits above as a mixture of water with, on the average, 14.5% steam. The outlet of the 1,661 pressure tubes are united in two... 

Between the 1986 Chernobyl accident and mid-1990s, only one nuclear power station was conunissioned in Russia, the 4-unit Balakovo, with unit 3 being added to Smolensk. Economic reforms following the collapse of the Soviet Union meant an acute shortage of funds for nuclear developments. By the late 1990s, exports of reactors to Iran, China, and India were negotiated and Russia s stalled domestic construction program was revived as far as funds allowed. 

---